Twitter comes out in support of the FCC's net neutrality proposal

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,294   +192
Staff member

twitter fcc net neutrality

In the lead-up to the Federal Communications Commission’s vote on proposed net neutrality regulations later this week, Twitter on Monday voiced its opinion on the matter.

In a blog post arguing its support for an open Internet, Twitter public policy manager Will Carty said safeguarding the historic open architecture of the Internet and the ability for all users to “innovate without permission” is critical to American’s economic aspirations and its global competitiveness.

Carty added that empowering “lesser” or historically less powerful voices to express themselves is at the core of Twitter’s DNA. The Internet of today provides people with the ability to communicate with the world in addition to making it incredibly easy for anyone looking to start a business to do so. It’s the great equalizer, Carty said.

twitter fcc net neutrality

To protect these freedoms, we need clear, enforceable, legally sustainable rules in place, the microblogging platform argues.

Twitter as a whole approves of the FCC’s approach of using some rules from Title II of the Telecommunications Act. It’s the same kind of “light touch” regulatory approach that was used in the 1990s with regard to wireless services.

Twitter is just one of many entities that have come out in support of net neutrality including President Obama. But not everyone believes it’s a good idea to reclassify Internet service as a utility. More than 60 major tech companies including Intel, IBM, Cisco and Qualcomm believe such a move would negatively impact broadband infrastructure investment and stifle growth across the entire economy.

The FCC is scheduled to vote on its proposed net neutrality rules on February 26.

Permalink to story.

 
One more piece of freedom the feds are trying to taking away.... one little piece at a time. Eventually we'll have nothing if we don't fight for what is right. All this crap about companies need regulated is just that, crap. Vote with your wallets people. Don't like a companies practice, you know where the door is...
 
It is interesting to watch the coverage of NN. Techspot et. al. seem to have no issue supplying occasional articles wherein unprofitable and/or overvalued companies argue for "light regulation" of the web while all but ignoring news identifying the current proposal as a leviathan.

I haven't been this excited to read a mystery box law since they passed healthcare back in 2010.
 
Vote with your wallets people. Don't like a companies practice, you know where the door is...

I can admit that I can't see the far reaching effects this reclassification may have, however, I'm wondering what you mean by "vote with your wallets people."?
I really would like you to elaborate more on this; in fact, give me at least 1 (one) alternative to the current ISP I have.
 
Vote with your wallets people. Don't like a companies practice, you know where the door is...

I can admit that I can't see the far reaching effects this reclassification may have, however, I'm wondering what you mean by "vote with your wallets people."?
I really would like you to elaborate more on this; in fact, give me at least 1 (one) alternative to the current ISP I have.

Where you live isn't the ISP's fault. Maybe you should argue to your local state government to allow more competition in the area.
 
Vote with your wallets people. Don't like a companies practice, you know where the door is...

I can admit that I can't see the far reaching effects this reclassification may have, however, I'm wondering what you mean by "vote with your wallets people."?
I really would like you to elaborate more on this; in fact, give me at least 1 (one) alternative to the current ISP I have.


It has to do w/ the nature of the law and the language used. It does not create competition but grants control over the technology to the FCC. This can range from the idealistic "equal treatment" of data to selective prioritization/bandwidth regulations to ensure websites receive equal exposure. It also means new taxes and greater service charges.

A good reference point would be the various "unintended" and "miscalculated" consequences of the Affordable Care Act, which worsened 5 things for every 1 it improved.
 
Back