Ubisoft pulled The Crew offline, and now it's facing a lawsuit

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,570   +956
Staff
Online Fiasco: A growing number of games are now forced to run online even when they support full-fledged single-player modes. Consequently, more single-player gamers are becoming dissatisfied with the way publishers do business these days. Ubisoft is one of the major offenders in this online-only mania, and consumers keep suing the corporation to get their games (or money) back.

French consumer group UFC-Que Choisir recently announced a new lawsuit against Ubisoft after the French publisher pulled The Crew's servers offline. This "unilateral decision" stripped consumers who purchased the game of their rights, the group said, as Ubisoft never mentioned the fact that the racing game had an expiration date.

Ubisoft released The Crew in 2014. It sold two million copies despite collecting mixed reviews from critics. Customers could either choose to play alone or in multiplayer, with both modes requiring an internet connection. The company ultimately shuttered The Crew's servers in 2024, rendering the game completely unplayable even in single-player mode.

UFC-Que Choisir said the publisher may have abused the contractual conditions related to every game's purchase, denying players ownership rights or any alternative way to keep the software running. Furthermore, Ubisoft did not offer any refunds to players after the game had essentially "expired." Ubisoft may have also used misleading business practices, running a marketing campaign that led players to believe they would have "unlimited" access to the game's online world.

UFC-Que Choisir is now suing Ubisoft because it wants to stop this kind of harmful practice, which could amount to substantial damage to consumers' general interests. The group said more games now require a permanent internet connection, which means publishers ultimately have the means to deactivate any game and thus damage players' ability to enjoy their purchases.

The French lawsuit is officially supported by Stop Killing Games (SKG), the consumer movement started by YouTuber Ross Scott in 2024. According to a recent SKG message, the new case has been building in the background for almost two years and is finally coming to fruition.

Scott and his group launched SKG as an answer to Ubisoft's decision to shut down The Crew. The initiative quickly grew in popularity, surpassing 1 million signatures in Europe and forcing the European Commission to take action.

Several government authorities, including the UK Parliament, have now held a debate about SKG and the issue of disappearing online games. A public hearing at the European Parliament is currently scheduled for April 16, 2026. Meanwhile, Ubisoft replied to SKG's proponents by stating that game "services" cannot go on forever. Maybe this is why I am still playing the Ghosts 'n Goblins arcade game in 2026, while I'm just barely interested in looking at any new Ubisoft production for the foreseeable future. I guess Ubisoft is well aware that it will reap what it has sown.

Permalink to story:

 
Maybe this is why I am still playing the Ghosts 'n Goblins arcade game in 2026, while I'm just barely interested in looking at any new Ubisoft production for the foreseeable future. I guess Ubisoft is well aware that it will reap what it has sown.

Alfonso, you might win me over yet.
 
I understand the servers "cannot go on forever" but its clear its used a cover-up since they didnt released a patch for offline play by "argument" it cannot be done, while the hacking community has did it with no help from Ubishit.
The game is playable again offline and online with a patch for about a year now.
 
I hope they win and mandate every publisher to be required to allow permanent offline game play.


Honestly, at this point most games are just a rinse and repeat microtransaction/reskinned version of the same game with an extra roman numeral tacked onto the end.
 
IMO one of the best gaming was when they were on dvd. Yours to keep but companies can't make money with buy once and use forever, not to mention pirating which I had my share of.
 
What the french government should do : Any gaming software company that sell a single player game with online-only mode, IF they intend to "retire" said game, they should be forced to remove the online-only option and let the game be played offline.

But that is something the french government couldn't care less, they are too busy with nuclear umbrellas.
 
IMO one of the best gaming was when they were on dvd. Yours to keep but companies can't make money with buy once and use forever, not to mention pirating which I had my share of.
Funny enough the golden age of gaming sales was during the PS3 and Xbox 360 days when most games were "buy once and keep forever" so there's no excuse....Companies got greedy after that.
 
it cannot be done, while the hacking community has did it with no help from Ubishit.
They meant it cannot be done without spending money and resource they don't want to spend. It comes down to them thinking they have made all of the money they are going to make on the Crew and no longer care about the game or the customers who bought it.

If the lawsuit were successful maybe it would force developers to put in a decent single campaign into every game to avoid this issue.
 
And then you wonder why so many people use pirated games? Because they don’t have these problems, for one thing.
 
They meant it cannot be done without spending money and resource they don't want to spend. It comes down to them thinking they have made all of the money they are going to make on the Crew and no longer care about the game or the customers who bought it.

If the lawsuit were successful maybe it would force developers to put in a decent single campaign into every game to avoid this issue.
Ubisoft said they cannot patch the Crew 1 because the game was not designed for local offline, but to sweeten the sour answer they said they will patch the Crew 2 and 3 for local offline. So they didnt invoked the money, but the game design from the ground up.
 
Back