Ukraine war sees Biden administration probe into Kaspersky Lab intensify

Oh look, a classic deflection tactic to try and hide the fact you didn't (and couldn't) refute any of the points I made above.

And I note all the Clintons did here was misrepresent what the spending was for; there's literally nothing here. What you're doing is just highlighting a headline in an attempt to try and get an emotional reaction, hoping no one actually bothers to read and understand what actually happened.

And yet, despite all the loud complaining about "her emails", those same people suddenly get quiet and defensive when asked "where's the nine hours of recordings from the official oval office recording system"? Or maybe if you prefer: "But his phone records!".

Either be consistent with your mock anger, or go away.
The Russia collusion hoax was based on the Steele Dossier which was paid for by Hillary & Co.
 
How did that Russia collusion investigation along with the fake impeachment work out.
Given the structure, context, and protocol of a presidential impeachment "trial", it amounts to a "mock trial" anyway.

Since the outcome is decided along party lines, and not in any relevant form of acceptable judicial process. It amounts to an affirmation of party loyally, nothing more.

Even Richard Nixon had the decency to resign as opposed to facing impeachment. Decency which Trump lacks completely, in any form or substance.
 
You're really chafing at the bit to get over to Twitter, and fawn over every pathological lie that comes out of the "Great Pumpkin's mouth, aren't you.
Best Brits are in this order:
1. Winston Churchill
2. Nigel Farage
3. Alfred the Great
4. Henry V
5. Edward IV
6. Admiral Nelson
 
Best Brits are in this order:
1. Winston Churchill
2. Nigel Farage
3. Alfred the Great
4. Henry V
5. Edward IV
6. Admiral Nelson
Perhaps, but none of those distinguished gentlemen are on Twitter ATM.

How far are we going to exacerbate this already far, far, off topic thread, if we start debating the merits of British heroes?

We're already at the point of receiving a scolding by mailpup as it is. :rolleyes:
 
The Russia collusion hoax was based on the Steele Dossier which was paid for by Hillary & Co.
Honestly, it was not. It was based on the Mueller report.



"The Mueller report, officially titled Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election, is the official report documenting the findings and conclusions of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 United States presidential election"

Sources and citations are at the bottom
 
There would have never been a Mueller investigation followed by a Mueller Report if it hadn't been for the Steele Dossier.
But they were unrelated in that it still found the facts.

And there would not be trains without the steam and coal engines. But trains today don't stand on the old methods.
 
I feel like using Windows is a bigger threat to data security than anything Kaspersky could do. I don't have the statistics but I would like to see a comparison of data compromised due to Windows vs Kaspersky.
 
I feel like using Windows is a bigger threat to data security than anything Kaspersky could do. I don't have the statistics but I would like to see a comparison of data compromised due to Windows vs Kaspersky.
The statistics are in.....

They are both equal in that regard

If you use Windows, ALL of your data is compromised while online
If you use Kaspersky, ALL of your data is compromised while online

Using Windows AND Kaspersky will compromise all of your data to both sets of threat actors behind each product

The real threat is not some anonymous kid hacking in his mothers basement

It is the product developers who have full access to every machine running their backdoored malware every time you connect to the evilnet
 
Last edited:
Back