uPlay hacking tool grants access to Ubisoft's entire catalog

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,291   +192
Staff member

A new hacking tool available on a Russian gaming forum allows users to circumvent security measures in place on Ubisoft’s uPlay game distribution platform. Specifically, the hack tricks the platform’s authorization tool into thinking the user has access to Ubisoft’s entire online catalog – even games that haven’t been released yet.

Members of the forum claim the hack has been known about for weeks, allowing users to download as many games as they want free of charge and without DRM. One such example is Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon, a title that was teased last week as an April Fool’s joke but turned out to be real. The game isn’t scheduled to be released until May 1 but there are already numerous walkthroughs on YouTube. Furthermore, the title can easily be found via BitTorrent if you know where to look.

ubisoft uplay

The exploit doesn’t appear to meddle with member accounts which is of course good news if you happen to have a uPlay account. The hack comes at a time when a number of publishers are flirting with the idea of always-on DRM or have already gone that way. Needless to say, vulnerabilities like this aren’t helping much to sway companies away from such methods.

We suspect Ubisoft is currently working on a patch although we haven’t heard anything official from them just yet. A word of warning: Ubisoft will likely ban any accounts that are caught using the hack so think twice if you are considering checking it out for yourself.

Permalink to story.

 
Maybe if publishers would stop trying to make their own version of Steam and just let Steam handle things, problems like this and Origin's terrible setup would never happen.
 
Actually steam support suck most of them. besides that in most cases it's best, but if you have any problem. You will have to deal with them by yourself, trust me I use steam for quite some time.
 
For a site that doesn't support hacking and pirating, how can such articles be posted? To me this seems like a contradiction in site regulation.
 
Back