US bans DeepSeek from federal agencies, prompting angry response from China

midian182

Posts: 12,003   +183
Staff member
What just happened? DeepSeek might be one of the most popular non-US AI companies right now, but it's being shown the door across US federal civilian agencies. Washington has ordered the removal of the Chinese firm's AI products from government IT systems and blocked future purchases, and the restrictions include third-party tools built using its technology. Beijing, unsurprisingly, isn't happy.

The Department of Homeland Security's notice was made public on October 19, ahead of today's Federal Register publication. The underlying order dates back to late July, according to AP, making this a public disclosure of an earlier decision rather than a ban signed this week.

The directive covers DeepSeek, its affiliates, and products and services developed using DeepSeek implementations. That last part means the directive is more than just blocking access to the company's chatbot. Agencies also have to consider what powers the software they buy.

DHS invoked the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018. Its stated concerns include DeepSeek's servers being located in China and the possibility that Chinese authorities could access sensitive US information. The order added that DeepSeek's AI models "present multiple threat vectors." It also warned of potential malware and other security flaws, pointing to publicly available research that found several critical vulnerabilities in DeepSeek's iOS app.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning hit back on Tuesday, accusing Washington of stretching national security arguments and politicizing technology and trade. Ning added that China will "will resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies." DeepSeek did not immediately respond to AP's request for comment.

Executive agencies have 60 days from the order's issuance to submit a written justification to DHS seeking an exception, including more time to comply.

This is familiar ground for the Chinese firm. In January 2025, the US Navy warned personnel against using DeepSeek. However, the military branch subsequently clarified that the message reflected existing restrictions on publicly accessible generative AI for official work, which also covered ChatGPT. It wasn't a newly invented policy aimed solely at one Chinese chatbot.

American AI companies have faced restrictions, too. The House of Representatives banned Copilot in April 2024 over concerns about congressional data reaching unapproved cloud services. That position changed in September 2025, when the House announced a Copilot rollout with additional legal and data protections. There's also the whole Anthropic saga.

While DeepSeek isn't facing a nationwide ban, the directive does affect companies selling AI software powered by its models to US federal civilian agencies.

Permalink to story:

 
Given how deeply Trump's pudgy little hands are in the pocket of the AI companies this is hardly surprising.
Yeah, so much for draining the swamp eh? The level of US government corruption is nothing short of astonishing. Not only that, they're not even hiding any of it, but rather doing it in the open and pretend it's the norm.
 
Perception is everything, and having the US Government make this a restriction across it's entirety, it sends a negative message about the product. Whether it truly is used in espionage becomes irrelevant when the average person does not research the accusations beyond their favorite news outlet. I agree that Trumps tech portfolio probably just jumped in value with this decision. Talk about the ultimate insider trading scheme.
 
If the Chinese models are free and the information isn't tracked, why is Beijing so upset about this?
Government demand is far beyond what a 'free' account covers for any AI provider. They would definitely be paying no matter which product they use. No government or corporate entity should ever use a 'free' account with any provider anyway, as your prompts (including sensitive data) are being used to train new models.
 
Back