Users report Pixel 7 camera glass spontaneously shattering without cause

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,178   +1,424
Staff member
Facepalm: If you bought or are considering purchasing the new Pixel 7, watch out for the glass coverings over the camera sensors. Many users report that the protective covers have violently shattered for no apparent reason. To make matters worse, Google seems to be filing complaints in the not-covered-by-warranty category.

Last month, Pixel 7 users began reporting strange fractures in the glass covering the phone's rear camera lenses. Reddit, Twitter, and Google's support forums are riddled with complaints and pictures of Pixels with their rear coverings appearing as if shot with a small projectile.

Most users are baffled about the breakage since they claim they have never dropped or banged their phones. Some say the glass just shattered while resting in their pocket. Spontaneous shattering is not unheard of, according to Corning Glass engineers.

"There's a layer of compressive stress, then a layer of central tension, where the glass wants to press out, then another layer of compressive stress," one engineer told Scientific American in 2013. If this delicate balance is not just right, the pressure can release, resulting in small outward explosions.

Some users suggest that temperature changes could be a catalyst triggering the problem. For example, users placing the phone into a warm pants pocket after having it out and exposed to cold winter temperatures might be enough to cause the glass to rupture.

Unsurprisingly, complaining Pixel 7 owners found Google less than cooperative about the situation. Four days ago, a Redditor claims a support rep said that the warranty did not cover the repair. The representative also told him that this was the first complaint the company had received about the issue. However, looking on Twitter, one can find reports dating as far back as mid-December.

Additionally, users have repeatedly brought up the problem on Google's Pixel Phone Help forum since at least December 9. A Twitter user even posted a screenshot of a Google Support Team member admitting (below) that the company is aware of the problem but has "decided NOT to include [the defect] as a part of the warranty. [emphasis Google's]."

So it would appear that whomever the Redditor spoke with either lied or was ignorant that reports have flooded into Google for a month, with support telling customers it was a $200 repair.

Shattering camera glass is not an unknown problem for smartphones. Samsung had similar issues with the Galaxy S20. Google seems to be following the same playbook.

Last year, droves of Galaxy S20 users reported the rear camera glass shattering spontaneously. Even though Samsung admitted that the breakage was caused by a pressure build-up under that glass and not by user abuse or accidents, it continued to charge to repair the faulty phone glass. Samsung said it would not honor warranty repairs because the damage was "cosmetic."

It was subsequently hit with a class-action lawsuit for fraud, breach of contract, and violation of several consumer protection laws. Samsung moved to postpone the hearing, citing that some of the listed plaintiffs did not opt-out of the arbitration clause per the terms of their contracts.

A judge agreed to hold the case pending the arbitration of potentially millions of incidents, effectively delaying the lawsuit indefinitely.

Permalink to story.

 
Such a weird issue.

I wonder if every single Pixel is affected or only a batch?
 
Such a weird issue.

I wonder if every single Pixel is affected or only a batch?
actually, what surprises me is with all the differentials stress they use in modern hardened glass that stuff like this doesn't happen more often. What's essentially going on here is that the tail of a prince ruperts drop is being broken. However, through nearly a century of engineering it's no longer a drop and shape it, layer it and give it all kinds of cool properties.
 
Google have the worst QC around, utter garbage quality products. When they first started selling the Nexus phones, they were great value and you could forgive the crap quality at 1/3rd the cost of the flagships, now they are asking big money for the same garbage QC. Never in a million years would I buy a Google phone or tablet.
 
"Some say the glass just shattered while resting in their pocket." - ah yes, those slim pants pockets that don't bend your phone at all when you move around...
 
Because it bent in their pockets? LMAO, what happened to Bendgate, or is it only applied to the IPhone 7??

I guess the "IPhone Killer" touted by many shills and envious Apple haters is dead.

But let's blame the users, as usual.
 
Yeah, such amateurs. Why not use the optional velvet pillow carrying case like I do?
Because it bent in their pockets? LMAO, what happened to Bendgate, or is it only applied to the IPhone 7??

I guess the "IPhone Killer" touted by many shills and envious Apple haters is dead.

But let's blame the users, as usual.
I've seen people do crazy stuff with their phones because of stupidly tight pockets (a girl I know destroyed her phone when she tried to pick up something from the ground fast). And "bendgate" was different, that was a major design flaw that allowed the phone to break easily even in normal pockets (very little force was needed).

Let's be honest here, the camera glass on the back of the Pixel does't just "spontaneously explode". It's easy to hit and crack if you are not careful and I've seen many other phones with cracked cameras (including iphones - my boss did it 2 times in just a few years).

It's why I buy sturdy covers that have good camera bump protection. It saved me many times.
 
Your hate is common and I get it, but Apple has nothing to do with this.
I dont hate apple, but I wouldnt expect you to read any of my past comments. The whole point of my comment is there is a reason people are willing to pay the apple tax, and this is one of them. This level of support for a $500+ device is inexcusable.

apparently I wasnt clear enough before.
 
I dont hate apple, but I wouldnt expect you to read any of my past comments. The whole point of my comment is there is a reason people are willing to pay the apple tax, and this is one of them. This level of support for a $500+ device is inexcusable.

apparently I wasnt clear enough before.
Ahhhhh. I see where you are coming from now.
 
Google issued a statement that it only happens if you take photos of unattractive people.
 
Back