Valve confirms Steam Machine and Steam Frame are still shipping this summer

midian182

Posts: 11,746   +178
Staff member
In a nutshell: With the memory crisis showing no signs of abating, there have been plenty of claims and rumors that Valve is going to delay the Steam Machine and Steam Frame again, possibly into next year. But the company has reaffirmed that the devices will launch this summer – still no word on how much they'll cost, though.

Valve has just announced that the Verified program – originally introduced alongside the Steam Deck to let users know how well a game will run on the handheld – is being expanded to include the Steam Machine and Steam Frame, "both of which are shipping this summer."

The post adds that as with Steam Deck Verified, the goal is to help customers understand the out-of-box experience for a given title on the upcoming devices, and how smoothly a game will run with no user work or configuration required.

Valve said the criteria for Steam Machine/Frame verification are similar to those for Steam Deck Verified: the default graphics configuration needs to perform well, text and UI elements need to be clear and legible on the built-in display, and the default controller configuration needs to work well with the Steam Frame Controllers. This applies to both VR and non-VR titles.

Steamworks documentation notes that Steam Machine dev kit units aren't currently available, which is likely due to the component shortage.

Developers are advised that the best way to ensure compatibility on the Steam Machine is to work on their game's compatibility with Steam Deck. "If your game runs well on Deck, it will also run well on Machine with no extra work required from you," Valve writes.

The Steam Machine and Steam Frame were both delayed from their original target of launching before the end of March. They were supposed to arrive in the first half of the year, but that deadline just passed. With DRAM and NAND prices so high as manufacturers divert their production capacity toward AI data centers, some thought Valve would postpone releasing the devices until next year in hopes that costs would come down.

With a release happening within the next few months, the big question now is price. As we noted in our feature 'This is Why You Won't Buy a Steam Machine in 2026,' when Valve announced the Steam Machine, 16GB of DDR5 would have cost about $50, about the same price as a 512GB SSD. Today, the cheapest single stick of DDR5-4800 on Newegg is priced around $150 to $200. We estimate that in order for Valve to make a profit on the Linux PC, it would likely have to charge at least $800, if not $900.

Brad Lynch, who has a history of Valve-related leaks, said last month that the Steam Machine may cost more than the Steam Deck OLED – referring to the new post-price-increase models, which reach $949, so it's possible that the 2TB Steam Machine model will be $999 or more.

Permalink to story:

 
With the memory market as it is no one is announcing prices in advance - they can't really as they don't know what it'll cost them themselves. Thanks OpenAI!
It's not just them, we are starting to see the real cost of AI now that investors, venture capital and banks are throwing cash into the AI money furnace anymore. Hardware orders have slowed significantly and nearly half of data center projects have been delayed or cancelled. AI costs more than humans and outside of a few applications, it performs significantly worse than humans. So now that the money has stopped flowing into the money furnaces, we are likely to see a price drop over the course of the summer. I also see nVidias recent announcement of the super series as evidence of this. They wouldn't was valuable TSMC allocations on gaming GPUs if something was up. Is the AI boom exactly over? No, but nVidia doing 9 billion a day in business likely is. I'm interested to see their next quarterly results. The company I work for was suppose to build 9 data centers this year, only 1 is still moving forward.
 
Lets hope stalling until (the end of) summer has the memory prices drop pretty considerably. Maybe we'll even see a drop in the SteamDeck price before this price is officially revealed.

The Steam Machine needs to push pressure on the big 3. Sony and Nintendo are just resting on their laurels and need proper competition, while MS needs more pressure to actually make good games again.
 
I'm sure it's way too late now but they would have been so much better going for a DDR4 based AM4 platform and then using the huge saving from this to beef up the very anaemic GPU. Back when they designed this the price difference for DD5 was negligible so I guess it sort of made sense, but the CPU and RAM in the system are way more capable than the GPU which will be a huge bottleneck. I get that they wanted to keep price down but the hardware balance is very odd for a machine intended to mainly play games...
 
I'm sure it's way too late now but they would have been so much better going for a DDR4 based AM4 platform and then using the huge saving from this to beef up the very anaemic GPU. Back when they designed this the price difference for DD5 was negligible so I guess it sort of made sense, but the CPU and RAM in the system are way more capable than the GPU which will be a huge bottleneck. I get that they wanted to keep price down but the hardware balance is very odd for a machine intended to mainly play games...
At some point you have to move on from old technology. Exactly who would want to buy a $1500 box with outdated am4 tech in 2026?

May as well offer bulldozer.
 
Lets hope stalling until (the end of) summer has the memory prices drop pretty considerably. Maybe we'll even see a drop in the SteamDeck price before this price is officially revealed.

The Steam Machine needs to push pressure on the big 3. Sony and Nintendo are just resting on their laurels and need proper competition, while MS needs more pressure to actually make good games again.
I mean, I don't disagree; they need the competition. But the odds that Steam Machine competes with Nintendo are close to zero, thanks to Nintendo's effectively walled-garden of franchise characters. And I suspect that Sony will continue to deliver the better visual performance with the PS5 over the Steam Machine, but I am 100% speculating here. At the very least, I think this is why Sony is pulling back on future PC releases: they don't want them on the Steam Machine, if it succeeds.

Now, Xbox? I suspect Steam Machine is going to eat its lunch, but only because Xbox Series X/S is already starving for both games and users.
 
I mean, I don't disagree; they need the competition. But the odds that Steam Machine competes with Nintendo are close to zero, thanks to Nintendo's effectively walled-garden of franchise characters. And I suspect that Sony will continue to deliver the better visual performance with the PS5 over the Steam Machine, but I am 100% speculating here. At the very least, I think this is why Sony is pulling back on future PC releases: they don't want them on the Steam Machine, if it succeeds.
It will bring us another step closer to a non-walled-garden platform that gets games in a way that is muuuuch closer to the convenience of an actual console. PC is good and all, but it currently doesn't have that friendly pick-up-and-play aspect that consoles have (especially the Nintendo Switch). The Steam Machine will be the closest thing I could convince console friends to get (if it's a good price) and they'd actually take PC gaming seriously.

And Sony only pulled back because they couldn't control PC gamers; thinking they could get away with treating us like 2nd class (while feeling entitled to our wallets). Someone up top took that personally and threw a temper tantrum lol
Capcom doubling down on PC shows that Sony is making a dumb reactionary move.

Now, Xbox? I suspect Steam Machine is going to eat its lunch, but only because Xbox Series X/S is already starving for both games and users.
Xbox is now a software brand (and I am perfectly happy with that). They're not worried about their hardware, or if it sells well because they have other platforms to reach millions more customers (more than making up for diversifying)... assuming the new boss doesn't pull a Sony. Them selling their games on the Steam Machine is also a win for them.
The only thing they need is good software. Their latest game offerings have been pretty meh.
 
At some point you have to move on from old technology. Exactly who would want to buy a $1500 box with outdated am4 tech in 2026?

May as well offer bulldozer.
On a Steam Machine who cares what hardware generation is under the lid, surely all that matters is how well it plays games?
Given the amount an AM4 box with DDR-4 would now save over a 16GB of DDR5 that $150 difference could be put into a GPU and you would end up with a far more capable machine overall. As I said the CPU in the Steam Machine is very imbalanced with the GPU as it is currently spec'd. The GPU is a huge bottleneck. You want all parts of the hardware to be running equally and an AM4 CPU + DDR-4 would still keep up easily even with a $150 more expensive GPU part.
It isn't Valve's fault - they made absolutely the right decision at the time - AM5 and DDR-5 are better and would have costed next to nothing extra to use. How could they possibly known that DDR-5 would become so ludicrously expensive? But in the current market an AM4 machine would now make way more sense. So we will end up paying way too much money for a pretty low-end device. Just another reason to thank the AI tech-bro-sociopaths and their wonderful future they are desperate to herd us into.
 

Until now, you could have downloaded your game from where the developer chose to sell it on, preferably on their site, without any store's on top commission.

The consoles offered the affordable hardware.

Epic store and Steam offered discounts.

But, on the PC the dev wasn't so inclined to release, without delays.


Microsoft would have to release a super optimised gaming windows, and try lock more users onto a single platform/store. Or steam would have to try make a successful OS, but also capture more console audiences.
But not many would install steam's OS on PC, so it's all left to the steam machines... But what advantage they offer over consoles and PC to be more successful?

 
Give me Half Life 3 as launch title.

Looking more forward to Deck 2 OLED with FSR 4.x support

Kinda funny people thinks Microsoft is in trouble because of these machines .. Windows sits at 94% marketshare on Steam. Linux down 0.51% since last month, tons of fragmentation between distros as well. No serious PC gamers uses Linux and most that contribute to the Linux marketshare, is doing it from a 2nd device, where their Primary PC is Windows.

I don't know ANYONE with just a Steam Deck, they also have a beefy PC running Windows as primary OS on the side.

These Steam devices is nothing but low-end PCs. Terrible for AAA gaming and I sadly think Steam Machine will be fairly similar, maybe mid-end for this. APU with 8GB VRAM won't do well in most demanding games, unless low-medium preset with FSR 4 enabled
 
Last edited:
Can join a list in the UK for the Steam Machine:

£879.00 - 512GB (without controller)
£1,149 - 2TB (without controller) Add £59 to either if you want one with a controller.
 
I am interested in frame a bit. I feel confident buying it because I think I won't have a problem selling it if it does not meet my needs. If I can get one, I will play with it and if I do not like it, I will drop a few hundred bucks and it will be gone. What I am really worried about is the price.
My mental limit is ~1000. I do not want it for 1400 1600 or even 1800.
And given how much every computing chip costs, I doubt it will be cheap.
I have never used a decent VR in my life. A one Samsung offered as a bonus for a new
phone purchase does not count. It taught me to avoid cheap VR headsets.
Anyways, if they are not sold out immediately and are not costing too much,
I am going to join the club. I really love that they focused on wireless this time.
And not having sensors is a plus as well.
 
Back