Viral video asks if you'd take a $240,000 office job or $120,000 remote position

midian182

Posts: 11,636   +176
Staff member
Winners & losers: Despite the aggressive push by CEOs and management, it's no secret that most people want to work at home full time. Illustrating this desperation is a viral TikTok video that asks the question: would you rather work in a full-time office job with a $240,000 salary, or have a $120,000 job that's fully remote?

Christina Najjar, better known by her online moniker Tinx, said someone online asked whether they should take a $120,000 remote job or earn double that amount by working full-time in an office.

Tinx said she could tell the question came from a Gen Zer. The implication is that no one else would hesitate to earn an extra $120,000 a year just to go into an office, "sit there, f**k around for a few hours, and make some friends."

"What do you guys think goes on at the office? It's not that scary," she said.

@tinx ♬ original sound - Tinx

Generation Z, typically defined as those born between 1997 and 2012 (give or take), has a reputation for preferring remote work. It's claimed that growing up with the presence of digital technology or in the information age has made some Gen Zers more comfortable with tech but socially disconnected.

There are still plenty of people outside the Gen Z demographic who would rather earn half a $240K salary if it meant staying at home, of course. Tinx does paint quite a rosy picture of office life – many are depressing, toxic, stressful, and pressure-filled environments that really aren't worth the extra money. Another $120,000 won't do much good if you have a mental breakdown or stress-induced heart attack.

The reality is that there are a lot of factors involved in making this decision. Many single people might prefer the extra money, while those with families are more likely to opt for remote work. Perhaps you're lucky enough to work in a fantastic office with great colleagues and bosses. There are also elements such as commutes and taxes to take into account.

It was reported last year that almost half of Dell's workers had opted for full-time remote work, even though doing so meant they would not be promoted or able to apply for new roles at the company.

A survey in 2022 showed that 96% of people would be willing to give up a percentage of their salary to work from home permanently. And not just a small amount: 30% would give up half or more, while two in five would take between 25% and 50% less pay to keep working from home indefinitely. Respondents were also willing to give up benefits such as health insurance and paid time off.

Permalink to story:

 
As Rob mentioned, there are defiantly a lot of other factors to consider, which is why I am not a fan of such questions. My current job, I wouldn't mind going into the office but we got rid of it. The one irony is that the internet connection at the office was not as dependable as my internet at home.
 
If they wanna cut the salary in half, I'd want a list of itemized reasons why. I can understand taking less for remote work - because the remote worker isn't in incurring the risks, extra time, and expenses required to commute and exist at an office - but half the salary? Perhaps if they can demonstrate it makes me half as effective...
 
There just isn't enough information to make a decision:

I currently have to work in an office, but my commute is only 20 minutes, my rent isn't terrible, I love the job and all the people I work with. So $240k would be an easy decision to make, however, if I didn't like the people in my office, my commute was terrible and took an hour each way I would reconsider working from home and taking a pay cut. Being able to live where I want without having to consider commuting to work would be pretty amazing, but that $240k a year would allow me to buy a house closer to work.
 
It'd depend on the commute for me. If it's under an hour I don't mind the drive. If it's over an hour each way I value that time more.
 
As Rob mentioned, there are defiantly a lot of other factors to consider, which is why I am not a fan of such questions.
If the job was in another country, it would be an instant no for me.
There just isn't enough information to make a decision:

I currently have to work in an office, but my commute is only 20 minutes, my rent isn't terrible, I love the job and all the people I work with. So $240k would be an easy decision to make, however, if I didn't like the people in my office, my commute was terrible and took an hour each way I would reconsider working from home and taking a pay cut. Being able to live where I want without having to consider commuting to work would be pretty amazing, but that $240k a year would allow me to buy a house closer to work.
Yep, my commute is only 10 minutes (can you even call it a commute?) and half of that is walking lol. I’m offered 2 days of WFH a week and I only use one of those days. My office is always quiet, and my coworkers are great. And now that I don’t live in California, my cost of living is extremely affordable. I typically go through 1 tank of gas a month which costs a measly $30, and housing costs around $900/month.

Anyways, anyone who bugs me tends to do so via messaging apps even when we’re both at work. Honestly the annoying people are far more tolerable in-person because they’re humanized when they’re right in front of you lol. That in turn makes it so I have the image of them in my mind when they do message me again and they aren’t annoying at all.

In my opinion, working remote has only made it HARDER to deal with coworkers and has the opposite intended effect. Without the office, I’d probably be apathetic to my coworkers and always want distance.
 
Both are in different tax brackets for 2026 (22% vs 24% if joint filing. Single income). Since each is at the lower end of both brackets I’d go with $240K since it’s still almost double the net.
 
We aren't talking the effects of a relatively small pay raise here.
All else being equal, ALWAYS follow the money.
Or you will hate yourself later, when your bank account is $120k lighter annually.
 
We aren't talking the effects of a relatively small pay raise here.
All else being equal, ALWAYS follow the money.
Or you will hate yourself later, when your bank account is $120k lighter annually.

LOL, no. At least for me.

I make less than the lower figure here and live in a supposedly expensive area and am not short of money because it's also about lifestyle. In fact, it's specifically about lifestyle as if you can't live on $120K/yr then there are significant lifestyle choices you can make to easily live within $120K.

Live a lower-pressure lifestyle for "only" $120k vs a higher-pressure $240K lifestyle? $120K low pressure every time. Zero chance I'd choose more stress for more $ because I already made that choice and continue to do so.
 
It depends. If I have to spend a considerable amount of time commuting and the work environment is terrible, I'd rather earn less and have more time and mental health.
 
I started work before the internet and have now retired early. Remote working was always spoken about as a promise for the future but I used to commute by motorcycle and the commute was usually the best part of my day. 30 years later and suddenly I was forced to work remotely. I missed chatting to everyone. I missed riding my motorbikes. I was fortunate enough to have options to work from either the Greek islands or the French Alps but, when there, I found it difficult working at all. I personally preferred working in an office with colleagues. I hated hot desking though, it was difficult to build up any relationships with people when they changed continually and it just seemed to make people feel more isolated.
 
I live here in NYC.
I worked on Wall Street during the pandemic (plandemic?).
We were stuck at home in front of computers like everyone else but I was fortunate enough to be financially prepared and already had my new house (in Long Island) so I didn't have to worry so much about relocating or transportation.

If you've got a job good enough, you can easily work remote without having to worry about being coerced or forced back into the office. Obviously the $240,000 is better than the $120,000. Right now you need to be focused on earning as much as possible because you have no idea how detrimental AI will be to your job or your future job opportunities. AI is killing middle management and data entry jobs.

I HATE my morning commute. It's ridiculous. Traffic is 100% even when there's no accidents. It's a crawl. During the quarantine I could get from work to home or home to work in no time because I was speeding and no one was on the road. Cops were calling out. But now, you're facing an hour commute instead of that 25 minute run.

I personally prefer the office. Ths is NYC. This is Manhattan. The women, the restaurants, the nightlife...can't give it up.

Work Remote is for pregnant women and nursing women. Being at home makes me go nuts.
 
I'd take the remote position. I have to drive almost an hour each way for work. I also make about half the remote wage listed. It also does not make sense to move closer to work as home prices and taxes just about triple!
 
I am tempted to say “screw off”, on behalf of all the people who has to work in the office for less than 100k.
 
Remote EVERY TIME. Who needs the additional 120k if you do not need to
-spend time commuting
-pay for gas
-pay for insurance
-car payments
-tires
-oil if ice
-deal with charging if EV
-other drivers who should be killed on sight for driving bro-dozers like monkeys
-parking at work
-paying for parking if your in a large city

seriously .. wake up .. walk to office .. work .. go downstairs cook lunch, eat lunch, take a nap .. work.

I did that for 5 years for broadcom and it was fantastic .. ill give away 120k every year for that peace of mind
 
Would choose what I have already chosen: The remote job. Wouldn't take the 50% pay cut though and don't have too.

Any company that thinks this kind of thing is acceptable wouldn't win me over anyway, so it works itself out naturally.

Also, I'm not a "Gen Z" person. I don't do commutes and I will not sit in a cubical again, for any reason.
 
I make less than the lower figure here and live in a supposedly expensive area and am not short of money because it's also about lifestyle.
And you should be applauded for that. But every last dime left on the table is not necessarily money that would immediately be spent. It's also money that could have been put away in savings accounts, or invested. I get you, I do, but I don't get, outside of family commitments, not making a small lifestyle change to double their pay.
 
Most likely, that 240k office job will require to live in the city in a claustrophobic condo that is going to cost double than a full house in the suburban area.

You will end up with half of that excess income being eaten in costs for going to the office. Not to mention that excess income is taxed at the 120k-240k bracket, and not from the 0-120k, meaning you are going to be taxed 30-40% on that income.

IMO, I take the 120k and the quality of life. I have done both and I am not planning of going back. If I have to go back, I will probably change job. Until then, things will stay the same.
 
Most, people nowadays, aren't even grateful to have a job. No, they want to run the show, do it their way. If, I had a business, I would FIRE someone like that, in a New York minute!
 
Last edited:
The fact 38% of people say they would give up their entire PTO to work from home permanently shows how much of a piss take it is
 
Back