Windows 11's next security push borrows heavily from smartphones

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,600   +978
Staff
Editor's take: Since the introduction of Windows Vista, Microsoft has attempted to enforce a new approach to software access rights on its often-resistant users. Now, the Redmond-based company appears to be trying again – this time in the name of AI agents and a more smartphone-like user experience.

Microsoft recently announced a potentially major change in how Windows handles applications and software. The update comes with a new security model for the operating system. According to Microsoft Distinguished Engineer Logan Iyer, the change is expected to significantly improve security and trust across the Windows ecosystem.

Iyer highlighted that Windows 11 is now installed on over one billion devices, supporting "millions" of apps across business, education, productivity, and gaming workloads. The OS has long been an open and compatible ecosystem, and that core approach will remain unchanged for the foreseeable future. However, some aspects of Windows are set to evolve, impacting both users and developers.

Microsoft is developing a new Baseline Security Mode, which enables specific runtime integrity safeguards by default. In simple terms, new Windows 11 installations will only run apps, programs, services, and drivers that are properly signed. Iyer emphasized that users and IT administrators will always have the ability to override this restriction, allowing selected unsigned applications to run if they choose.

In addition, Windows will adopt smartphone-like app permissions through a new User Transparency and Consent feature. The operating system will alert users whenever an app requests access to sensitive system resources, such as files, the camera, or the microphone. Users will then have to decide how to respond to the prompt, granting or denying access on a per-app basis.

These prompts are designed to be clear and "actionable," Iyer said. Users will also be able to modify previously granted or denied app access at any time. Microsoft emphasizes that User Transparency and Consent will provide high levels of visibility, offering a clearer view of what apps and AI agents are actually doing on the system.

Redmond developers plan to implement BSM and UTC according to three guiding principles: the new features must provide system-enforced transparency to increase visibility into app behavior, request consent clearly through user-centric prompts, and ensure that Windows can continue running pre-existing, well-behaved applications while the new standard is rolled out.

Microsoft has attempted similar prompt-based runtime models in the past. Windows Vista introduced User Account Control, a widely criticized feature that made the operating system frustrating for many users. UAC has improved significantly on both Windows 10 and Windows 11, though many power users disable the prompt from the start.

Permalink to story:

 
"Iyer emphasized that users and IT administrators will always have the ability to override this restriction, allowing selected unsigned applications to run if they choose."

Yeah right. Nobody trusts you, Microsoft has twice tried to shut down the open garden that is windows, once with UWP and once with Smart App Control.
 
I never had issues with UAC. It works just fine when you need it to be active and it works just fine when you disable it (as in it doesn't come up when disabled).
 
This seems more like a push to block applications from being installed outside the control of Microslop, so they can they force developers into the Windows store and pay up.
Their concern seems to be for people like my clients who constantly have to pay for service calls to clean up their Click-Me syndrome.

My favorite recent question: "I didnt pay for my antivirus and now my antivirus protection has lapsed, what should I do?".

Ummmm....I appreciate the $50/hr service calling but maybe just pay for it?

Thus MS should screw off. Dont ruin my gravy train!
 
Another Microsoft non-announcement. Nothing's really changing except how installation choices are presented to the user, another learning curve for the user to eventually do what the user is already doing, installing whatever the heck s/he wants to install.

"The OS has long been an open and compatible ecosystem" - that's a blatant lie. Windows is not "open", it's closed source. Unless he's referring to the security holes, then yes, Windows is open, wide open.

Compatible"? compatible with what? no context, no point of reference = gobbledygook; he's simply sprayin' adjectives around to make whatever they're doin' sound like progress, it isn't.

The addition of AI is nothing more facilitating, improving their (M$ & the 3-ch gang's) ability to collect user information and data, but presented as being useful to the end user.

"Windows" and "security" have always been oxymorons. Windows has always been since its inception the least secure OS available. Shiny ≠ secure.

GNU/Linux is great functionally for a daily driver and is orders of magnitude more secure than Windows, but for real security and privacy trust OpenBSD.
 
Another Microsoft non-announcement. Nothing's really changing except how installation choices are presented to the user, another learning curve for the user to eventually do what the user is already doing, installing whatever the heck s/he wants to install.

"The OS has long been an open and compatible ecosystem" - that's a blatant lie. Windows is not "open", it's closed source. Unless he's referring to the security holes, then yes, Windows is open, wide open.

Compatible"? compatible with what? no context, no point of reference = gobbledygook; he's simply sprayin' adjectives around to make whatever they're doin' sound like progress, it isn't.

The addition of AI is nothing more facilitating, improving their (M$ & the 3-ch gang's) ability to collect user information and data, but presented as being useful to the end user.

"Windows" and "security" have always been oxymorons. Windows has always been since its inception the least secure OS available. Shiny ≠ secure.

GNU/Linux is great functionally for a daily driver and is orders of magnitude more secure than Windows, but for real security and privacy trust OpenBSD.
It's an open market. Anybody can develop software for Windows without a license or approval. Anybody can make an executable.

Compatibility? Really bruh? It's windows, Microsoft is the king of backwards compatibility. Maintaining the ability to run 30 year old software isn't easy. Every device is compatible with windows. Every printer, fax, every piece of software, ece. It's like the single biggest selling point of Microsoft.
 
It's an open market. Anybody can develop software for Windows without a license or approval. Anybody can make an executable.

Compatibility? Really bruh? It's windows, Microsoft is the king of backwards compatibility. Maintaining the ability to run 30 year old software isn't easy. Every device is compatible with windows. Every printer, fax, every piece of software, ece. It's like the single biggest selling point of Microsoft.
Compatibility? Really bruh? It's windows, Microsoft is the king of backwards compatibility.
No they're not. they typically render drivers or software incapable or running on older hardware intentionally to force the purchase of new hardware. Do they have a compatibility mode, sure, but it's not the same as native compatibility.

Every device is compatible with windows. Every printer, fax, every piece of software, ece. It's like the single biggest selling point of Microsoft.
You're wrong. I spent 30 years+ as a computer tech. My computer business was a certified Microsoft partner for 18 years. You're wrong, you're 100% wrong. Expected, though; every millennial able to type into a text field assumes he knows more than 'the other guy'. Dunning-Kruger much?!
 
MY computer...I should be in control of ANY software I install.
MS sees that by using the iOS method of LOCKING DOWN the software, YOU can only install
improved software from apps MS have OK'd. (with a charge to the company of course).
Heck, even Android is going into lockdown mode too!
You will OWN nothing and like it!
 
No they're not. they typically render drivers or software incapable or running on older hardware intentionally to force the purchase of new hardware. Do they have a compatibility mode, sure, but it's not the same as native compatibility.


You're wrong. I spent 30 years+ as a computer tech. My computer business was a certified Microsoft partner for 18 years. You're wrong, you're 100% wrong. Expected, though; every millennial able to type into a text field assumes he knows more than 'the other guy'. Dunning-Kruger much?!
I can see you have a lot of fun at parties.

news flash: 99% of software and hardware is made for Windows. It is the dominant OS,w hich you would know if you had actually worked 30 years in IT. But with that attitude you wouldnt have made it a month.

And I can run 11 on hardware from over a decade ago, use a joystick from 2002, and play games from the 90s, without any external software. So GG, better luck next time.
 
Ye olde "one step forward, two steps back".

It's been a while since news like this surprised me.
Kind of sad really.
Trust Is Hard-Earned, Easily Lost, Difficult To Reestablish.
Ignore these facts at your peril.
 
Back