YouTube will ban videos disputing the 2020 U.S. presidential election

[scavengerspc]

Biden's associate was interviewed by the FBI just last month. Not two years ago.

And these three things are definite:

1. Hunter Biden took tens of millions of dollars from sources in Russia and China
2. Hunter's emails say he passed portions of that money to his father
3. Hunter is currently under criminal investigation for same.

Things like this are small potatoes even if he is guilty. So much more to worry about but it is fun to watch the GOP of all people whine about someone else gaming the system.

"Joe Biden's brother James is also caught up in federal probe"

Yawn. I will wait till the end to comment.
I do find it telling that trumps dealings as President didn't cause you to bat an eye but Joe Bidens family has your panties on fire. (the panties thing is for Sybil).

 

[havok585]

LOL, let the whining begin!!

Hey, those new septic tanks NewsMax and the other Q outlet are full of stories how the Supreme Leader Chump won bigly!!

You don't like YouTube's policy?? Go there and enjoy the "alternate facts"!

Youtube (or any other private company) is under no obligation to post lies to massage your Trumpist egos or give you a cookie.

Youtube doesn't post anything, what are you on about ? they just like to be biased POS's

 

[Endymio]

Things like this are small potatoes even if he is guilty. So much more to worry about but it is fun to watch the GOP of all people whine about someone else gaming the system.

A VP taking millions in bribes to alter US foreign policy for the benefit of Russia and China is "small potatoes"? One wonders what a Democrat would have to do for you to term it a serious offense. Order a nuclear strike on Kansas, perhaps?

 

[PEnnn]

Censorship creates the aura of truth of that being censored. Nothing piques the interest in material more than censorship.

Indeed. Simple minds are easily swayed by hoaxes, conspiracy theories and the word "censorship"!!

 

[scavengerspc]

A VP taking millions in bribes to alter US foreign policy for the benefit of Russia and China is "small potatoes"?

Ok, but why are you bringing up Pence?

 

[Endymio]

Ok, but why are you bringing up Pence?

Small tip for you: snarky falsehoods aren't an effective debate strategy. Try truth instead:

"Dec 10 (AP) : The FBI’s subpoena of a laptop and hard drive belonging to Hunter Biden came in connection with a foreign money laundering investigation dating from late 2019, according multiple federal law enforcement officials...."

"Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the richest woman in Russia and the widow of close Putin associate and former mayor of Moscow, the [report] revealed..."

"In 2013, Hunter Biden flew with his father on Air Force 2 to China to meet [regarding the business deal] ... Emails from [Hunter's] laptop state that his father would receive a ten percent stake in the newly-formed foreign venture...."

 

[scavengerspc]

Small tip for you: snarky falsehoods aren't an effective debate strategy. Try truth instead:

"Dec 10 (AP) : The FBI’s subpoena of a laptop and hard drive belonging to Hunter Biden came in connection with a foreign money laundering investigation dating from late 2019, according multiple federal law enforcement officials...."

"Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the richest woman in Russia and the widow of close Putin associate and former mayor of Moscow, the [report] revealed..."

"In 2013, Hunter Biden flew with his father on Air Force 2 to China to meet [regarding the business deal] ... Emails from [Hunter's] laptop state that his father would receive a ten percent stake in the newly-formed foreign venture...."

It was a joke before we continued. Man, I'll bet you are great at parties.

Like I said before accusations are only suggestions until proven. It would take me days just to post accusations against trump. And the ones he has coming soon.
So let me try it this way. Tell me what crime Biden has been found guilty of. Besides poor judgment.
PLEASE DO NOT LIE TO ME. Try to break that pattern.

 

[Endymio]

It was a joke before we continued.

Ah, I see. The falsehoods you post are all jokes. You like jokes a lot, I see.

Tell me what he has been found guilty of. Besides poor judgment.

Poor judgement alone is very bad in a President. But he's guilty of far more than that. Even ignoring the tax fraud and money laundering investigation, as VP, Biden was subject to federal ethics statutes. Taking millions of dollars secretly from Russian and Chinese sources while responsible for foreign policy decisions in those nations violates these statutes (specifically 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502.):

"Employees who find that a party is a person with whom the employee or a family member has a personal or business relationship should consult with their ethics counselor before taking official action in a particular matter.... "

As reported by many sources, ethics officials repeatedly advised Biden against Hunter's overseas business deals -- and this was despite Biden concealing the fact that he personally was profiting from these deals, not simply his son.

Those of us who actually pay attention to foreign policy long wondered at Biden's decisions here. Why deny weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian aggression? Why override both Congress and the State Department to deny Taiwan F-16s, just because China objected? The list goes on and on.

And now we know why.

 

[scavengerspc]

Ah, I see. The falsehoods you post are all jokes. You like jokes a lot, I see.

Poor judgement alone is very bad in a President. But he's guilty of far more than that. Even ignoring the tax fraud and money laundering investigation, as VP, Biden was subject to federal ethics statutes. Taking millions of dollars secretly from Russian and Chinese sources while responsible for foreign policy decisions in those nations violates these statutes (specifically 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502.):

"Employees who find that a party is a person with whom the employee or a family member has a personal or business relationship should consult with their ethics counselor before taking official action in a particular matter.... "

As reported by many sources, ethics officials repeatedly advised Biden against Hunter's overseas business deals -- and this was despite Biden concealing the fact that he personally was profiting from these deals, not simply his son.

Those of us who actually pay attention to foreign policy long wondered at Biden's decisions here. Why deny weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian aggression? Why override both Congress and the State Department to deny Taiwan F-16s, just because China objected? The list goes on and on.

And now we know why.

So none. Get back to me when a crime has been proven and a conviction handed down. Thats how it worked before trump and his ilk such as the two of you. Pitiful.

 

[wiyosaya]

That's not free speech. I can't yell fire in a crowded room for my amusement and not get in trouble when people get hurt. I can't post pictures of you around your neighborhood stating you have sex with toddlers (assuming it's false) and not get in trouble. You can't say whatever you want whenever you want it and hide behind "free speech" with no consequences.

Not many people, here or in forums elsewhere, seem to get this. SCOTUS has weighed in many times on what is covered in the US by 1st amendment rights. One thing that is not considered free speech is incitement to violence.

If one looks honestly at the SCOTUS rulings on free speech, the 1st amendment is considered "speech that is necessary for a free exchange of ideas." As I see it, one thing that is not necessary for a free exchange of ideas is conspiracy theories, or anything that is based in lies.

So none. Get back to me when a crime has been proven and a conviction handed down. Thats how it worked before trump and his ilk such as the two of you. Pitiful.

I was thinking about this and how Trump suggested that people who voted by mail should also attempt to vote in person to see if it was allowed. Apparently, now, there is evidence that something like at least 1,000 people in one state tried to do so - a number which would not affect the outcome of the presidential election in that state. We cannot say, without talking to them, what led them to do so, but I would not put it past Trump to try to get people to do so so that he would then be able to claim "massive fraud" in an effort to overturn the results of the election. As I see it, his suggestions may have been to intentional and aimed at getting this kind of fraud to happen so that he could have the results of the election overturned. In other words, I could easily see this being another attempted Trump scam.

EDIT: Spelling/clarity

 

[wiyosaya]

Ah, I see. The falsehoods you post are all jokes. You like jokes a lot, I see.

Poor judgement alone is very bad in a President. But he's guilty of far more than that. Even ignoring the tax fraud and money laundering investigation, as VP, Biden was subject to federal ethics statutes. Taking millions of dollars secretly from Russian and Chinese sources while responsible for foreign policy decisions in those nations violates these statutes (specifically 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502.):

"Employees who find that a party is a person with whom the employee or a family member has a personal or business relationship should consult with their ethics counselor before taking official action in a particular matter.... "

As reported by many sources, ethics officials repeatedly advised Biden against Hunter's overseas business deals -- and this was despite Biden concealing the fact that he personally was profiting from these deals, not simply his son.

Those of us who actually pay attention to foreign policy long wondered at Biden's decisions here. Why deny weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian aggression? Why override both Congress and the State Department to deny Taiwan F-16s, just because China objected? The list goes on and on.

And now we know why.

And what about Ivanka's Chinese business dealings? https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommyb...ast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/ Is this OK according to you?

 

[Endymio]

And what about Ivanka's Chinese business dealings? to you?

Be serious. If you or I apply for a trademark not previously used in China, we'll get it. That's how trademark law works. However, if you or I show up in China and ask for $1.5 Billion dollars to "invest" for the PRC government, we'll be laughed out the country. Unless your last name is Biden, that is.

And you're forgetting the worst part of this equation. Trump was far tougher on China than any President before him. You and the Scavenger both have complained about Trump's trade war against China and his bans on Chinese companies. Are you seriously suggesting that China bribed Trump - by giving Ivanka a trademark -- to take so many actions which hurt them substantially?

Biden's case is the exact opposite. His son flies to China on Air Force 2, and, in the company of his father, meets government officials and walks away with a check. And not just any check, but the largest check the PRC has ever given any foreign individual to invest. Ever. Given to a man with no previous experience in investing, by the way. And then what happens? Biden suddenly and inexplicably goes soft on China, making decision after decision that benefits them personally ... and hurts the U.S.

Now, do you see the difference?

 

[Endymio]

I was thinking about this and how Trump suggested that people who voted by mail should also attempt to vote in person to see if it was allowed.

You just can't stop spreading disinformation, can you? Here's the actual quote:

" “Sign your mail-in ballot. You sign it and send it in, and then you have to follow it,” Trump said. “And if, on election day or early voting, that is not tabulated and counted, you go vote .... you have to make sure your vote is counted."