Microstar 6337 i815E Pro
review
Posted by
Adam
Klein on September 28, 2000 - Page 5/6
Company: MSI
Computer Product: Microstar 6337 i815E Pro motherboard
Benchmarking
- CPUMark99
|
650MHz
-
440BX
63.7
-
VIA133A
64.4
-
815E
Pro
64.9
866MHz
-
440BX
81.2
-
VIA133A
78.9
-
815E
Pro
80.1
910MHz
-
440BX
85.1
-
VIA133A
83.4
-
815E
Pro
84.6
|
975MHz
-
440BX
N/A
-
VIA133A
86.7
-
815E
Pro
87.5
1008MHz
-
440BX
N/A
-
VIA133A
N/A
-
815E
Pro
91.7
|
As
you can see from these results, the 815E Pro sits right in
between the two at high bus speeds. At 650MHz, both the VIA
133A and the 815E Pro were able to gain a higher score due to
the ability of both chipsets running the memory at 133MHz.
With a 150MHz bus, the BX system wasn't totally stable.
This
was mainly caused by: the heavily overclocked AGP bus speed
and the Leadtek GeForce 2 board not running totally stable. At
1008MHz, the only one left standing was the 815E Pro. I would
have like to of tried 1008MHz with the Asus P3V4X, but the
revision of this board had the newer clock generator, which
limited the bus speed to a max of 150MHz.
3DMark
2000 Benchmarks
(@ 1024x768x16)
|
650MHz
-
440BX
5890
-
VIA133A
5840
-
815E
Pro
5901
866MHz
-
440BX
6935
-
VIA133A
6721
-
815E
Pro
6849
910MHz
-
440BX
7102
-
VIA133A
6992
-
815E
Pro
7043
|
975MHz
-
440BX
N/A
-
VIA133A
7206
-
815E
Pro
7321
1008MHz
-
440BX
N/A
-
VIA133A
N/A
-
815E
Pro
7774
|
3DMark
takes really good advantage of the higher AGP clock speed of
the overclocked BX system. Another interesting point of
interest is at the 650MHz level. Even though the 815E Pro and
the VIA 133A boards ran the memory 33MHz faster with AGP 4X,
the BX system was able to match them.
Go
to next page !
|
