TechSpot

TechSpot Pricewatch TechSpot Hot Deals
Windows Startup Radar Tips & Tricks (blog) Guides & Tweaks Windows updates
News Archive TechSpot Blog TechSpot RSS Feeds User Picture Gallery Techspot's IRC# (Chat) TechSpot in Spanish
 



Make homepage

Add to Favorites

IRC #3dspotlight

TS in Spanish

 

  M-Audio Revolution 7.1 soundcard review

--

 

Performance

To test the Revolution I used Aureal Minerva, 3D Mark 2003, RightMark Audio Analyser 5.0 & Audio WinBench.

Aureal Minerva

Aureal Minerva reports the following when the Revolution is set to Sensaura/Game Mode;

  • Device Selected: M-Audio Revolution

  • DirectSound reports...

  • 1 Primary buffer available

  • 33 Total 2D hardware mixing buffers available

  • 33 Static 2D hardware mixing buffers available

  • 33 Streaming 2D hardware mixing buffers available

  • 33 Total 3D hardware buffers available

  • 33 Static 3D hardware buffers available

  • 33 Streaming 3D hardware buffers available

  • 0 Total bytes sound card memory static buffer storage

  • 0 KB/sec Data transfer rate to hardware static buffers

  • 48000 KB/sec Max sample rate supported by secondary buffers

  • 100 KB/sec Min sample rate supported by secondary buffers

Minerva is testing: <M-Audio Revolution> for :

DirectSound acceleration: <available>

DirectSound3D acceleration: <available>

A3D acceleration & compatibility: <not available>

As stated in the Gaming section, the Revolution doesn't provide DirectSound acceleration; as such the channels are powered by the CPU. Aside from the higher CPU usage it can be expected the Revolution would incur in gaming, the number of available channels should prove sufficient for the majority of games, though more gaming oriented Soundcards, e.g. Audigy 2, would provide a higher number of channels supported, along with DirectSound acceleration (which would provide lower CPU use).

 

3DMark 2003

For testing 3D Audio performance I used 3D Mark 2003's 3D Audio performance test. For comparison I also tested the nForce APU in 6 channel output mode (Dolby Digital Encoding being active, or not, had no effect on the frame rate).

 

Soundcard

nForce APU

Revolution 7.1

No Sounds

23.0

23.0

24 Sounds

19.6

14.3

60 Sounds

17.3

Not Supported

As you can see, using the Revolution 7.1 resulted in a rather noticeable frame rate hit, with the nForce proving far more capable performance wise, clearly showing the impact using software channels can have over a more gaming oriented soundcard. As discussed earlier the Revolution provides a maximum of 33 3D channels when set to Sensaura/Game Mode, as such the 60 Sounds test 3D Mark 2003 offers wouldn’t run.

 

Audio WinBench

For CPU usage testing in DirectSound/DirectSound 3D the Revolution was set to Sensaura/Game Mode. Due to some motherboard problems I was unable to carry out comparative tests on a same speed CPU, though I previously had tested the Audigy 2, nForce APU and SonicXplosion on a 1.29Ghz Athlon, opposed to the 2400+ XP used with the Revolution. Here’s a sample of the results, again, bear in mind the CPU differences:

Clearly the Revolution is at something of a disadvantage when it comes to CPU usage, something which the 3D Mark 2003 Audio performance test results also indicated. The complete AudioBench benchmark results can be downloaded here. To some extent this may be improved on as reportedly the TerraTec DMX 6Fire 24/96 provides more respectable CPU usage numbers (this uses a similar, more high-end Envy24 chip).

 

RightMark Audio Analyser

RMAA is "an Independent Audio Measurements Open-Source Project". This is perhaps the most objective testing method I can provide for the review. Testing was performed in loop-back mode, rather than using another soundcard for recording purposes (Which would be more ideal, though I don't own a more recording oriented Soundcard, e.g. TerraTec DMX 6Fire 24/96). Tests were carried out at 2 different Bit depths/Sampling rates:

Sampling mode: 16-bit, 44 kHz

Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB:

+0.12, -0.06

Very good

Noise level, dB (A):

-93.5

Very good

Dynamic range, dB (A):

93.4

Very good

THD, %:

0.0009

Excellent

IMD, %:

0.011

Very good

Stereo crosstalk, dB:

-94.7

Excellent

General performance: Very good

Sampling mode: 24-bit, 96 kHz

Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB:

+0.13, -0.07

Very good

Noise level, dB (A):

-96.2

Excellent

Dynamic range, dB (A):

95.9

Excellent

THD, %:

0.0006

Excellent

IMD, %:

0.012

Very good

Stereo crosstalk, dB:

-94.0

Excellent

General performance: Excellent

For the complete breakdown (with graphs) of these results please see the respective pages for 16-Bit/44 kHz & 24-Bit/96 kHz.




Go to next page !

  TechSpot Pricewatch - Computer & Electronics Prices updated everyday

-
Search:    for    

You can also browse through categories in our online price guide, among the available categories: Retail & OEM Processors - Video Cards - Motherboards - Memory - Soundcards - Hard Drives - Monitors - Printers - DVDs - CD-RWs - PDAs and more !

Get weekly updates on new
articles, news and contests
in your mail!

» Vundo need help logs attached

» Completed 8 step virus/spyware/malware remova...

» How much is my PC worth?

» Pioneer DVD 215D

» Laptop shows blank screen at power on



-

  TechSpot  The PC Enthusiast Resource    |    News    |    Reviews    |    Guides    |    Downloads    |    Drivers    |    Forums    |    Pricewatch    |    News Archive    |    RSS Feeds

  Our Blog    |    Tech Deals    |   vb Sitemap    |    User Gallery    |    Startup Radar    |    Icons by Foood    |    Powered by StoryTeller    |    TechSpot in Spanish


  Copyright © 1998-2009 TechSpot.com. TechSpot is a registered trademark. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy policy.

Advertising | About TechSpot