13 shots fired at Indianapolis councilman's home after backing $500 million data center

Sorry, I dont argue with stupid, hope you get well soon. I love how you rewrite history from all the historians. Of course the WHOLE world is wrong.

Sure man. You have only convinced yourself. You are simply not a serious person.
National scholars and historians disagree with you so you are simply put, incorrect. Its not something that is debatable. There is nothing to debate, you are simply wrong.

Nazism include the argument that superior people have a right to dominate, and purge society of supposed inferior elements. This is far from leftist as it gets. And the 25 bullet points dont mean anything. We all know what Nazis did... you cant rewrite history. The history books are there. Go back to school.

1. Nazism and Fascism
Fascism originated in Mussolini’s Italy. It’s an ultranationalist, authoritarian system that rejects democracy, glorifies violence, and seeks total control of society.
Nazism was Hitler’s version of fascism. It had all the core features of fascism, plus its own racial-biological obsession: antisemitism, Aryan supremacy, Lebensraum (territorial expansion), and genocidal social engineering.
Historians classify Nazism as a form of fascism — a German variant with unique features.
So, saying “Nazi Germany was not fascist” is flat-out wrong. It was fascism in practice, even if it branded itself differently.
---
2. The “Socialist” in National Socialism
“National Socialist German Workers’ Party” (NSDAP) was deliberately misleading branding. Hitler used “socialist” and “workers’” to peel away support from left-wing parties (like Social Democrats and Communists).
Once in power, the Nazis destroyed trade unions, outlawed strikes, banned left-wing parties, and murdered or imprisoned socialists and communists.
Economic policy under the Nazis was capitalist-nationalist: private property remained, corporations thrived, and the state bent industry toward war and racial goals. That’s the opposite of socialism.
So, calling Nazism a “branch of socialism” is as nonsensical as calling North Korea a democracy just because it’s in the name.
---
3. The “Branches of the Socialism Tree” Claim
That framing is propaganda. Fascism and Nazism didn’t grow out of socialist movements — they grew out of ultranationalism, militarism, and reaction against socialism.
In fact, fascists and Nazis defined themselves largely in opposition to socialism and communism. They called Marxism the mortal enemy.
---

Bottom line:
Nazi Germany was fascist. Nazism was not “socialism,” but a far-right, ultranationalist, racist form of fascism that hijacked the word “socialist” for branding. Fascism and socialism are not branches of the same tree; they are opposing ideologies.
 
Last edited:
Still cant name one leftist leader who was cheering and dancing in the streets for Kirk's death. Cmon Endymio, put your money where your mouth is or go back to your corner.

You here spewing blatant easily disprovable lies, you better be able to back it up since you are so right about everything.

Lets see how your ego back peddles this one.

This is one giant joke for you. You lose more and more credibility from everyone every time you post this non sense. Im so glad more and more folks are calling you out for your lying and revisionist history. Its only going to get harder for you my friend. Better get to smashing that keyboard!
 
No actual historian or political scientist has gone on the record to claim that Nazis were Leftists. You have though. Perhaps you missed your calling as a historian. You clearly know something the rest of the worlds scholars dont. LOL

Oh lookit, history.
"However, historians point out the Nazi Party did not embrace socialism, as it is commonly defined, in any significant sense. Once in power, the Nazis were enemies of genuine socialism and aimed to wipe out the political left."


Ooops:

"
As Hitler controlled the masses support for the political right, the conservative elite believed that they could use Hitler and his popular support to ‘democratically’ take power. Once in power, Hitler could destroy the political left. Destroying the political left would help to remove the majority of political opponents to the ring-wing conservative elite.


Once Hitler had removed the left-wing socialist opposition and destroyed the Weimar Republic, the conservative elite thought they would be able to replace Hitler, and appoint a leader of their choice.


As Hitler’s votes dwindled in the November 1932 elections, the conservative elite knew that if they wanted to use Hitler and the Nazis to destroy the political left, they had to act quickly to get Hitler appointed as chancellor.


Von Papen and Oskar von Hindenburg (President Hindenburg’s son) met secretly and backed Hitler to become chancellor. A group of important industrialists, including Hjalmar Schacht and Gustav Krupp, also wrote outlining their support of Hitler to President Hindenburg.


The support of these figures was vital in Hindenburg’s decision to appoint Hitler as chancellor. Once elected, the conservative elite soon realised that they had miscalculated Hitler and his intentions."
 
Trump had more assassination attempts against him than our last eight Democrat presidents all combined, and when Charlie Kirk was assassinated, millions of liberals literally cheered and danced in the streets.

Give the people what they want to see and they'll rejoice to see it.
 
Back