390TB game archive Myrient to shut down as storage costs surge

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,581   +967
Staff
Editor's take: Myriad of Entertainment, a site known for providing fast access to large collections of video game-related content, is expected to shut down soon. The site's sole maintainer cited rising operational costs and expressed frustration that the current AI investment boom is worsening economic pressure for small independent operators, while disproportionately benefiting large corporations and wealthy investors.

In a recent update shared via Telegram, the maintainer of Myrient announced that the service will shut down on March 31, 2026. After that date, hundreds of terabytes of gaming-related data is expected to disappear from the internet. The decision reportedly follows a sharp increase in storage and hosting costs, which has made continued operation financially impractical.

The site's owner, who has chosen to remain unnamed, said the project is facing persistent funding challenges. While donations help offset some operational expenses, they are insufficient to cover growing web traffic and infrastructure costs. The maintainer reportedly contributes about $6,000 per month from personal funds to sustain the service, a situation described as unsustainable over the long term. In addition, some download managers have been configured to exploit site features in ways that increase bandwidth and hosting burdens.

Myrient allows compatibility with most download management tools, but the operator says certain software clients bypass platform safeguards by suppressing donation-related notices. The maintainer also claims that some third-party tools have attempted to unlock restricted features for commercial use, which violates the site's non-commercial distribution policy.

The shutdown announcement also cited broader industry pressures. Prices for storage components, including RAM, SSDs, and traditional hard disk drives, have reportedly risen significantly since last September amid increased demand from AI data center construction. As a result, hosting and server maintenance costs for the archive have increased accordingly, while external funding sources and donations have remained limited.

"There are still many other smaller reasons, I could go on and on about them, but nobody would want to read it. In short, I can no longer afford to run the site," Myrient's maintainer said.

Myrient hosts more than 390 terabytes of curated game collections, including complete sets of MAME ROMs and "Exo" preservation projects covering classic DOS and early Windows 3.x software. The site was originally designed as a preservation-oriented distribution platform, emphasizing accessibility, structured organization, and fast, advertising-free downloads.

Operating without advertising revenue or major external funding, Myrient now faces rising infrastructure costs associated with large-scale archival hosting. The operator has pointed to broader market pressures linked to the expansion of AI data center construction, which has increased demand for storage hardware and contributed to rising component prices. Some preservation advocates have expressed concern that the shift toward AI-driven computing workloads may further constrain availability in the consumer storage market.

The service is expected to remain operational for the next few weeks, though the developer has shown little indication of reconsidering the shutdown decision.

In response, members of the digital preservation community have begun organizing efforts to archive content hosted on Myrient's servers. These efforts include the formation of a discussion group on Reddit dedicated to coordinating data preservation activities.

Permalink to story:

 
Myrient is only one of many sources, but it's never fun to see someone close up shop.
They were one of the less troublesome to deal with. Someone else will step up.
 
I wonder if any the discussions about preserving the preservation are being centered around purchasing all the drives themselves? No way even a community can download all 390TB in the next few weeks, even if it was optimized to ensure nothing got missed and every second used.

Hard to beat a "hatchback full of hard drives" when it comes to large data transfers.
 
Awful lot of repeated content in the article, just worded slightly differently

"The site's sole maintainer cited rising operational costs "
"The decision reportedly follows a sharp increase in storage and hosting costs"
"As a result, hosting and server maintenance costs for the archive have increased accordingly"
"Myrient now faces rising infrastructure costs associated with large-scale archival hosting."
 
Awful lot of repeated content in the article, just worded slightly differently

"The site's sole maintainer cited rising operational costs "
"The decision reportedly follows a sharp increase in storage and hosting costs"
"As a result, hosting and server maintenance costs for the archive have increased accordingly"
"Myrient now faces rising infrastructure costs associated with large-scale archival hosting."
Cause otherwise the article would have been 3 sentences,,,
 
I wonder if any the discussions about preserving the preservation are being centered around purchasing all the drives themselves? No way even a community can download all 390TB in the next few weeks, even if it was optimized to ensure nothing got missed and every second used.

Hard to beat a "hatchback full of hard drives" when it comes to large data transfers.

Just for grins I totaled it up - a 24 bay rackmount hot-swap NAS is $500. Seventeen 24TB drives at $600 each covers the amount of data, so $10,200, for a total of $10,700 - not including tax and shipping. You don't want to just have a JBOD though, you want raid and a couple of hot spares at minimum, which adds to the total disk count (depending on how you go about it) which is why the 24 bay NAS is appropriate. So you're pushing your way towards $14K - $15K with tax/shipping.

There are of course somewhat less expensive options (more but smaller capacity drives, but not by much, and the uber-high capacity drives are in short supply to begin with.
 
I went and downloaded a 1994 Microprose flight sim. It's hard and doesn't look to good. Maybe the content should be maintained but not at 6k loss a month
 
Just for grins I totaled it up - a 24 bay rackmount hot-swap NAS is $500. Seventeen 24TB drives at $600 each covers the amount of data, so $10,200, for a total of $10,700 - not including tax and shipping. You don't want to just have a JBOD though, you want raid and a couple of hot spares at minimum, which adds to the total disk count (depending on how you go about it) which is why the 24 bay NAS is appropriate. So you're pushing your way towards $14K - $15K with tax/shipping.

There are of course somewhat less expensive options (more but smaller capacity drives, but not by much, and the uber-high capacity drives are in short supply to begin with.
Where are you getting a 24-bay NAS for $500? Link please, I’d love to upgrade mine :)
 
Where are you getting a 24-bay NAS for $500? Link please, I’d love to upgrade mine :)

I just chose the first one to come up on "24 bay NAS' on amazon. Granted, it's by that trusted name in NAS's, RROYJJ.

Yeah, that's some mad name recognition stuff there.

But - looking a tiny bit closer, it's just a disk chassis, not NAS - but you don't necessarily need a NAS for just bulk semi-cold storage of a metric shite ton of data. Provide your own logic - motherboard, SAS card, a decent cpu and some ram - and go from there. Definitely not a plug-and-play venture though for sure. I see now a Synology 24 bay NAS at $14,500.

Yeah, I was off in lala land when I did my 'just for grins' "research".
 
Awful lot of repeated content in the article, just worded slightly differently

"The site's sole maintainer cited rising operational costs "
"The decision reportedly follows a sharp increase in storage and hosting costs"
"As a result, hosting and server maintenance costs for the archive have increased accordingly"
"Myrient now faces rising infrastructure costs associated with large-scale archival hosting."
AI AI AI
 
If we don't consolidate our power and resources, the politicians will win eventually.

The harder peoples lives become the less likely ppl will have time for luxurious like gaming
 
Why not create a torrent of the archive if server costs are a reason?

Many big companies user BitTorrent as a way to lower server costs. Many open source projects allow you to download their releases with BitTorrent.

This is exactly the use case the protocol was created for. To distribute large files without overwhelming the seeder. Despite it's negative association with piracy BitTorrent is a legitimately useful technology that is underutilized.
 
Looked at it, and most of the stuff isn't that useful to me. I did find Mo'Slo which might be useful some day if I ever get around to making a server for retro stuff. I didn't see something else I would have liked: a patch for large disks for the storage limit quirks of various early FAT formats that retro software might require.
 
Back