Along with Intel, the US government is exploring taking equity stakes in TSMC, Micron, and Samsung through CHIPS Act

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,902   +58
Staff
Why it matters: The White House is weighing whether subsidies under the $52.7 billion CHIPS and Science Act should come with government equity stakes in leading semiconductor firms. The move would expand federal involvement in a sector Washington views as critical to economic competitiveness and national security.

Two sources familiar with the discussions told Reuters that US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has floated the idea in connection with an ongoing plan to acquire a 10 percent stake in Intel in exchange for federal aid. He has also raised the possibility of extending the approach to other subsidy recipients, including Micron Technology, TSMC, and Samsung Electronics, though much of the funding remains undistributed.

On Tuesday, the White House indicated that negotiations with Intel were underway.

"The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters.

Micron, Samsung, and the White House declined to comment further. Taiwan chip giant TSMC also had nothing to say.

If completed, the effort would mark the first time Washington has taken direct ownership stakes in major technology manufacturers as part of an industrial policy initiative. Lutnick has said publicly that the government would not direct business decisions at Intel or other companies, but acknowledged earlier this year that such a move would be without precedent. During the 2008 financial crisis, the federal government injected capital directly into corporations, acquiring stakes in several banks and automakers to restore liquidity and confidence.

Additionally, the administration has applied elements of this approach in another industry. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump approved Nippon Steel's takeover of US Steel, contingent on the Japanese firm granting Washington a "golden share" that prevents plant closures or offshoring of production without presidential approval.

The CHIPS and Science Act, passed in 2022, aims to boost domestic semiconductor production through subsidies, research funding, and incentives for new manufacturing plants. The Commerce Department administers the program, while Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has participated in internal discussions.

The government finalized subsidies late last year, allocating $4.75 billion to Samsung, $6.2 billion to Micron, and $6.6 billion to TSMC to support new US fabs. Intel has also received substantial backing, with Micron ranking among the largest recipients after Intel.

In June, Lutnick indicated that the administration was reassessing some awards previously announced under President Joe Biden, calling them "overly generous." He added that Micron had committed to expanding its US investments in response to the renewed negotiations.

Permalink to story:

 
When they get to 51% of the stock, then you can get excited. Right now he's doing something much smarter with the chips act money. Instead of just throwing taxpayer money at these companies and getting nothing in return, they're using it to buy stock with the cash infusion. If Intel recovers, and the rest successfully invest the money in the U.S., not only will these companies sell more chips made here, but the government can get some or all of their investment back. Hell, they might even make some money on the deal.

Beats throwing the money out the window a la Solyndra type "investments'
 
The word was "fascism."
Funny how often that rhymes with "socialism".
When they get to 51% of the stock, then you can get excited. Right now he's doing something much smarter with the chips act money. Instead of just throwing taxpayer money at these companies and getting nothing in return, they're using it to buy stock with the cash infusion. If Intel recovers, and the rest successfully invest the money in the U.S., not only will these companies sell more chips made here, but the government can get some or all of their investment back. Hell, they might even make some money on the deal.

Beats throwing the money out the window a la Solyndra type "investments'
Equity is good but unless they buy enough to make up a significant percentage, they will have no voice in how the company is controlled. Artificially boosting the share price isnt going to exchange the bad leadership at Intel or make TSMC open more factories here.

CHIPS funding, OTOH, cam come with strings attached that directly force said corporations to work in favor of the government funding them.
 
When they get to 51% of the stock, then you can get excited. Right now he's doing something much smarter with the chips act money. Instead of just throwing taxpayer money at these companies and getting nothing in return, they're using it to buy stock with the cash infusion. If Intel recovers, and the rest successfully invest the money in the U.S., not only will these companies sell more chips made here, but the government can get some or all of their investment back. Hell, they might even make some money on the deal.

Beats throwing the money out the window a la Solyndra type "investments'
Nothing like using taxpayers cash to effectively manipulate the stock market. And here was me thinking the US was a capitalist nation.
 
Funny how often that rhymes with "socialism".
Equity is good but unless they buy enough to make up a significant percentage, they will have no voice in how the company is controlled. Artificially boosting the share price isnt going to exchange the bad leadership at Intel or make TSMC open more factories here.

CHIPS funding, OTOH, cam come with strings attached that directly force said corporations to work in favor of the government funding them.

I know, but the point that the chattering political class was making was that this was a takeover of Intel that "Republicans and Trump" said they were against. I am really tired of politics being practiced on a tech site, especially by people who don't know how stocks and the economy work.
 
Nothing like using taxpayers cash to effectively manipulate the stock market. And here was me thinking the US was a capitalist nation.

As I said, when they get to 51%, then you MIGHT have a point. While stock manipulation does happen (mostly due to greed, NOT desire to control), I fail to see how a 10% share will upend the market, other than to drive the stock price higher from the infusion of cash. Which, btw, DID NOT HAPPEN if you look at the actual Intel stock prices as of late.

For a Trump takeover of Intel and attempt to manipulate the market, it didn't work too well, did it?
 
There is an obvious conflict of interest if the Government owns a portion (majority, minority doesn't matter) of a company and is also tasked with regulating and enforcing laws on that same company.

Poor AMD, can't ever manage to catch a break. This time it will literally be the US government that rigs the game in Intel's favor.
 
When they get to 51% of the stock, then you can get excited. Right now he's doing something much smarter with the chips act money. Instead of just throwing taxpayer money at these companies and getting nothing in return, they're using it to buy stock with the cash infusion. If Intel recovers, and the rest successfully invest the money in the U.S., not only will these companies sell more chips made here, but the government can get some or all of their investment back. Hell, they might even make some money on the deal.

Beats throwing the money out the window a la Solyndra type "investments'

While all of this is correct, you don't need 50+1% shares to have the ability to force a company to do certain actions. And that's where the danger is: government forcing it's priorities on to private businiesses.

Again, to be clear: There are certain situations where direct intervention is necessary; outright purchasing Intels fab unit being one such possibility. But outright investment in the companies stock open up a massive avenue for abuse that can not be ignored.
 
I love all these comments about socialism and communism. When Obama bailed out GM and Chrysler, guess what the government received in exchange? Equity in the company and a seat at the board. The government got to decide how to streamline operations, what plants to close, etc. It was called an amazing deal and "the American way." Trump does it, it's socialism. Obama does it and it's American. Go figure. Biden literally GIFTED billions to an industry that profits are in the hundreds of billions. Companies that are the largest on the planet. Billions in tax free gifts. How dare Trump want something in return!
 
I love all these comments about socialism and communism. When Obama bailed out GM and Chrysler, guess what the government received in exchange? Equity in the company and a seat at the board. The government got to decide how to streamline operations, what plants to close, etc. It was called an amazing deal and "the American way." Trump does it, it's socialism. Obama does it and it's American. Go figure. Biden literally GIFTED billions to an industry that profits are in the hundreds of billions. Companies that are the largest on the planet. Billions in tax free gifts. How dare Trump want something in return!
It is socialism when Obama did it and it is socialism when Trump did it and I am for it both times for the record.

But then don't go claiming one party is the socialist party and the other is a haven of capitalism. Be f***ing consistent.
 
This is Corporate Socialism, not fascism. The goal is to save the corporation. Whereas Fascism is always about saving the national ethnic identity. Sure, there is some overlap.

During wartime, nations always take over corporations. The West is effectively at war with Russia and China, so this move with Intel shouldn't surprise anyone. Intel is a key western asset.

Look at Russia. I believe that most Russian military corporations are owned by the state. This gives Russia a TREMENDOUS advantage during wartime. The Russian corporations don't have to show a profit or pay income tax. They are free to dedicate production lines to proprietary military hardware that has no conceivable external market. They can dedicate their R&D budget to military matters. This is why Russia outproduces the EU and US in military hardware by a ratio of at least 3 to 1. Russian artillery shell, tank, drone and hypersonic missile production is off the charts.

During WW2, the allies won by depriving Japan and Germany of critical oil and mineral resources. That's not possible with Russia because of its sheer size, covering 11 time zones.

Note that Russia still hasn't taken out Ukrainian rail lines and roads that bring in foreign resources. They could easily do that with Oresnik missiles. That means Russia hasn't decided to deliver the coup de grace yet.

If you play Total Annihilation, BAR (Beyond all Reason) or Zero-K, you learn that controlling production is the key to winning a war.

 
As I said, when they get to 51%, then you MIGHT have a point. While stock manipulation does happen (mostly due to greed, NOT desire to control), I fail to see how a 10% share will upend the market, other than to drive the stock price higher from the infusion of cash. Which, btw, DID NOT HAPPEN if you look at the actual Intel stock prices as of late.

For a Trump takeover of Intel and attempt to manipulate the market, it didn't work too well, did it?
That's because it hasn't happened yet. A government-backed stock with potential Trillions of equity behind it, isn't likely to lose value is it? Then the marketplace becomes meaningless.
 
I love all these comments about socialism and communism. When Obama bailed out GM and Chrysler, guess what the government received in exchange? Equity in the company and a seat at the board. The government got to decide how to streamline operations, what plants to close, etc. It was called an amazing deal and "the American way." Trump does it, it's socialism. Obama does it and it's American. Go figure. Biden literally GIFTED billions to an industry that profits are in the hundreds of billions. Companies that are the largest on the planet. Billions in tax free gifts. How dare Trump want something in return!

-Its all socialism, but Republicans/MAGA are ok with it when their guy does it.

"Only Nixon could go to China" in realitme. Sometimes people just need their tribe to support something for it to become OK.
 
I love all these comments about socialism and communism. When Obama bailed out GM and Chrysler, guess what the government received in exchange? Equity in the company and a seat at the board. The government got to decide how to streamline operations, what plants to close, etc. It was called an amazing deal and "the American way." Trump does it, it's socialism. Obama does it and it's American. Go figure. Biden literally GIFTED billions to an industry that profits are in the hundreds of billions. Companies that are the largest on the planet. Billions in tax free gifts. How dare Trump want something in return!
As I remember, the founding fathers of our country laid the foundaions for business production to be controlled by the businesses themselves who would pay a reasonable amount of taxes to the government who would use that taxation to maintain the government infrastructure for the benefit of the common welfare. I guess that just doesn't jive with the economic philosophy of mankind's wants being insatiable. I don't exactly know what government ownership of production facilities will mean in the long run. But if Biden did give away billions and bailed out GM and Chrysler and Trump does intend to buy equity in chip manufacturers, it seems very much like the same thing whichever way you turn. I guess there must be some kind of mentality that all great politicians are innocent lamb honest injuns. Could there be a meeting between left and right minds behind closed doors? A famous southern governor once said that some day there would not be a dime's worth of difference between a Democrat and a Republican. Could it be there has never been a dimes worth of difference between a Democrat and a Republican.
 
Well… state capitalism has served China well so far but what Trump is aiming for looks more like Kremlin’s kleptocratic capitalism.
 
I've just written about 6 replies to this article and about 4 more in this journal and said just about the same type of thing about the content of the articles in every case. IMO it all boils down to the fact that everyone should no that no one whatever he is can be a better human being than they are themselves. The human race cosists of seven races of man and 10 world religions including communism. There is not one shred of mercy or honor among thieves.
 
Back