Amazon data center linked to rare cancers and miscarriages in Oregon, report warns

midian182

Posts: 11,931   +183
Staff member
Connecting the dots: The environmental damage caused by data centers could be having a greater impact on people's health than we realized. According to a new report, several of Amazon's facilities in Oregon have contributed to a rise in rare cancers, muscle disorders, and miscarriages among nearby residents.

The Lower Umatilla Basin aquifer in Morrow County, Oregon, is the only source of water for up to 45,000 residents, reports Rolling Stone. But samples from the aquifer show that chemical toxins have increased over the years.

Nitrate concentrations in some wells have been found as high as 73 ppm (parts per million), 10 times the state limit of 7 ppm and seven times the federal limit. It was discovered that 68 of the 70 wells in the area violated the federal limit for nitrates in the drinking water.

Jim Doherty, a cattle rancher and former county commissioner of Morrow County, told the publication that he noticed more people in the area were reporting unexplained medical conditions, including cancers that usually affected the elderly.

Doherty said that of the first 30 homes he visited where residents were reliant on well water, around 25 people had recently had miscarriages, while six had lost kidneys. There was also a 60-year-old who had his voice box taken out because of a smoking-related cancer, but he'd never smoked in his life.

Doherty believed that the rise in these cancers was in part due to several massive farms and food processing plants in Morrow County. But some experts say the arrival of a 10,000-square-foot Amazon data center in 2011 "supercharged" the pollution.

The farms pump out millions of gallons of wastewater loaded with nitrates from the fertilizer, with most of it seeping into the ground.

Amazon's arrival in the region has intensified an already-serious environmental problem. The company's data centers draw tens of millions of gallons of groundwater from the aquifer each year to cool their servers. That water is then discharged into the Port's wastewater system, where it mixes with existing nitrate-laden runoff that's already being pumped onto nearby farmland. Because the soil in the area is highly porous, it quickly becomes oversaturated, allowing even more nitrates to seep downward into the aquifer instead of being absorbed.

The issue compounds when Amazon extracts that same contaminated groundwater – already above federal nitrate limits – for its cooling systems. As the water circulates through the data centers, some of it evaporates, but the nitrates don't, resulting in a higher concentration of pollutants. By the time this used water is routed back into the wastewater system, nitrate levels can spike dramatically, in some cases averaging 56 parts per million – roughly eight times higher than Oregon's safety threshold.

Scientists believe even small amounts of nitrates can cause significant harm to the human body, including debilitating conditions in newborns and certain cancers.

Responding to the report, Amazon spokesperson Lisa Levandowski said that "our data centers draw water from the same supply as other community members; nitrates are not an additive we use in any of our processes, and the volume of water our facilities use and return represents only a very small fraction of the overall water system – not enough to have any meaningful impact on water quality."

Kristin Ostrom, executive director of activist group Oregon Rural Action (ORA), told Rolling Stone that comparisons could be drawn to the water crisis in Flint, Michigan. Ostrom said there were parallels in the slow response and those affected – 40% of the county's residents live below the poverty line.

"How can you live with yourself knowing that the water you put in people's houses is causing miscarriages or cancer, or God only knows how it stunts the growth of a kid?" said local resident Kathy Mendoza.

Permalink to story:

 
This is nothing like Flint. Flint was caused by the government putting known acidic water through lead pipes trying to save money. Sounds to me like nitrate levels in groundwater have been an issue for a long time, and you are responsible for your well water.

I mean, unless you want to turn over control of your wells to the government. Then you could claim it's like Flint. Something tells me they don't want to do that....
 
We have this problem severely in Iowa, especially because the population centers are downriver from intense agriculture that over-fertilizes. The runoff all dumps into the rivers and we have a high cancer rate as a result. There was actually a nitrate crisis just *this summer* where we had a lawn watering ban. We need to hold wasteful and harmful ag practices accountable AND the massive amount of water used by datacenters doesn't have to be like this to intensify it.
 
So...

1. Farming is the source of elevated nitrates.
2. The data center does not produce nitrates.

Got it.
You didn’t because you missed on:

3. Instead of recirculating water to cool the data center, Amazon uses well water which then promptly dumps back out thus amplifying the problem.

Perhaps now you get it?

The testing equipment we use where I work is liquid cooled via a cooling tower system using recirculating deionized and filtered water. That’s the proper way to do it.
 
I am assuming they are dumping so much water because it is cheaper than cooling it down and reusing it?
It is going to become expensive as untreated well water will cause scaling buildup and prompt expensive maintenance. And if they treat the water to avoid the issue, they should not just dump it. So Amazon is not adding nitrites, but what are they adding to it? Anyone made any analysis?
 
Rolling Stone magazine has zero credibility; this has been established in multiple court cases. The danger of "nitrates" is generally overblown, in fact there are nitrates that are good for health. The evidence for carcinogenicity is weak. Not saying they're benign or not a concern; it's all dose-dependent.

The proximate issue is the farming. The data center's contribution falls into the noise. Why they're making noise about the datacenters is obvious: deeper pockets to sue than farmers.
 
Where are our so called politicians in this. They knew about this and have no plan but to keep getting pay off to ignore. they should have looked at this instead of the money. City, county, state and federal are the problem. They all look at tax revenue to spend or pocket. Teach the farms learn to not overspray, residents not to over fertilize, over water and for the Data centers to treat water as it comes in and goes out to safe levels. Ask science how to clean with chlorine, sand filters, UV light etc. There is a solution but we need leaders to find it and most politicians are doing their job.
 
This is nothing like Flint. Flint was caused by the government putting known acidic water through lead pipes trying to save money. Sounds to me like nitrate levels in groundwater have been an issue for a long time, and you are responsible for your well water.

I mean, unless you want to turn over control of your wells to the government. Then you could claim it's like Flint. Something tells me they don't want to do that....
Agree that the causes are nothing like Flint, but the response might be: too little, too late. At least in this instance it seems the government is doing something, they fined Amazon 10k a few months ago. The publicity will have a much bigger impact than the fine, of course, but given that not much has changed since then (as far as I could tell), a bit larger of a fine is necessary (should Amazon be found to be responsible here).
https://www.applevalleynewsnow.com/...cle_c71b52f2-6e16-40ca-8406-c286a769ad35.html
 
So...

1. Farming is the source of elevated nitrates.
2. The data center does not produce nitrates.

Got it.
But they amplify the concentration as water evaporates from the cooling process. To me this speaks to the poor design of data centers that require so much water, there are definitely designs out there that require almost zero water. And, per Amazon's own admission, the water quality problem predates Amazon's presence. Amazon would have known about the issue and still chose to build out a data center this way. They may not be entirely responsible, but I don't think they are blameless, either.
 
Back