America is building EV chargers at record speed, just as demand cools

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,913   +58
Staff
The takeaway: The United States is adding fast-charging stations for electric vehicles at an unprecedented rate, even as EV sales cool and automakers pull back on battery investment. According to new data from Paren, a firm that tracks charging deployment, more than 18,000 new fast-charging ports were installed in 2025 – a 30 percent expansion in just one year. The country now hosts over 13,200 public fast-charging sites, a sign that infrastructure growth is outpacing demand for the vehicles themselves.

Much of this transformation stems from technical and market shifts that have steadily lowered the barriers to adoption. Early EV adopters often faced broken ports, incompatible connectors, and a confusing patchwork of apps just to find a working charger. Those issues have become less common as networks grow denser and standards align.

In 2023, Tesla agreed to open portions of its Supercharger network to all vehicles, fundamentally reshaping accessibility. That deal allowed non-Tesla drivers – from Ford to Kia and Mercedes – to plug in at thousands of new locations. The move spurred competitors like Electrify America, EVgo, and Ionna to accelerate their own deployments. Ionna, a joint venture backed by General Motors, Kia, and other automakers, added 740 ports in its first year alone.

Paren's co-founder and CTO, Bill Ferro, describes the scaling effect as inevitable. "You got this big snowball that's rolling downhill, and it just keeps getting bigger," he told The Washington Post. The metaphor fits: after years of inconsistent support, the US charging grid is now expanding faster than the market it was meant to serve.

Meanwhile, expansion isn't limited to high-speed stations. The US Department of Energy counts around 64,000 "Level 2" charging stations across the country – slower units typically installed at workplaces and shopping centers. Combined with the fast-charging sites, total public chargers now number about 77,000, or more than half as many as all gas stations nationwide.

Surprisingly little of this growth has come from government funding. Only about 3 percent of last year's new fast chargers were financed under federal programs. The $7.5 billion congressional allocation from the Biden era faced repeated delays and halts before being restarted under the Trump administration.

A federal court recently ruled that the earlier suspension of the program was unlawful, clearing the way for states to resume infrastructure spending. So far, only about 2 percent of the total funds have been used. Analysts expect future federal dollars to fill the geographic "dead zones" private developers avoid – particularly rural corridors and long stretches of highway where coverage gaps persist.

"The idea is to ensure chargers every 50 miles or so on national highways," said Corey Cantor of the Zero Emission Transportation Association. He emphasizes that the public role is to connect what the market overlooks, not to compete with it.

The surging number of chargers has arrived just as EV sales have lost momentum. The third quarter of 2025 saw a 40 percent spike – over 400,000 vehicles sold – as buyers rushed to claim a $7,500 federal tax credit before it expired at the end of September. Sales fell sharply the following quarter, a textbook example of the "pull-forward" effect where consumers accelerate purchases to beat policy deadlines.

Now, with new incentives withdrawn and major automakers redirecting funds toward hybrid or gas models, industry forecasters expect EV sales to level off or decline slightly. Even so, improved charging accessibility could soften the downturn. A 2024 Pew Research Center study found that Americans who live closer to public chargers are far more likely to consider purchasing an EV – a reminder that infrastructure and adoption remain tightly linked.

For many in the field, that may be the key signal. After a decade of false starts and fragmented planning, the US is finally developing the consistent backbone of a national electric refueling system – not because of top-down mandates, but because the network is becoming a dependable, business-driven utility. Whether sales rebound in the near term, the foundation for the next phase of electric mobility is clearly being laid.

Permalink to story:

 
FYI, Canada reduced the 100% tariff on Chinese EVs down to 6%. Chiefly thanks to Trump's utterly (and unnecessarily) hostile attitude towards them. The only reason they had this tariff in place was to protect American car companies. Now they (rightfully) don't care anymore. Of course, US senators and car makers are losing their sh*t and blame Canada. Yeah, well, it's a free market. If you don't like it, go talk to your boss, Trump.

Trump also said Chinese car companies can sell their stuff in the US as well if they build the factory there. So guess what, they most definitely will.

I don't see a world where these cheap Chinese EVs imported via Canada DON'T flood the American market.

And thus I don't see a world where American car companies don't collapse. They're so extremely uncompetitive it's beyond belief. They're dead in the water, they just don't know it yet. Most Americans don't realize how extremely cheap these Chinese cars are. They're killing it in Europe, they'll be killing it even more in the US. It's gonna be a massacre.

Tesla included. Zero innovation ever since the Y launch. Only gimmicks. Robotaxi dreams, for the 6th year straight (now "unsupervised", as in, supervised by 2 persons). Remote controlled "robots". While profits shrunk by 90% already. Whatever dude, just keep sipping on your Ketamine.

GG Trump, your random ramblings and threats to your allies definitely paid off. Such an economy genius.
 
FYI, Canada reduced the 100% tariff on Chinese EVs down to 6%. Chiefly thanks to Trump's utterly (and unnecessarily) hostile attitude towards them. The only reason they had this tariff in place was to protect American car companies. Now they (rightfully) don't care anymore. Of course, US senators and car makers are losing their sh*t and blame Canada. Yeah, well, it's a free market. If you don't like it, go talk to your boss, Trump.

Trump also said Chinese car companies can sell their stuff in the US as well if they build the factory there. So guess what, they most definitely will.

I don't see a world where these cheap Chinese EVs imported via Canada DON'T flood the American market.

And thus I don't see a world where American car companies don't collapse. They're so extremely uncompetitive it's beyond belief. They're dead in the water, they just don't know it yet. Most Americans don't realize how extremely cheap these Chinese cars are. They're killing it in Europe, they'll be killing it even more in the US. It's gonna be a massacre.

Tesla included. Zero innovation ever since the Y launch. Only gimmicks. Robotaxi dreams, for the 6th year straight (now "unsupervised", as in, supervised by 2 persons). Remote controlled "robots". While profits shrunk by 90% already. Whatever dude, just keep sipping on your Ketamine.

GG Trump, your random ramblings and threats to your allies definitely paid off. Such an economy genius.
IMO, if the GOP had won the 2024 election, even if it wasn't Trump, they would have done the same thing. The GOP's history on clean energy is total Crap, IMO. But yet, Trump, IMO, is the worst and I live in the US.
 
This is generally a good thing. It really frustrates me that people think it has to be "this or that" when talking about ICE vs electric vehicles. I know people who work from home and might leave their house once or twice a week. Then there are people like me who drive an average of over 100 miles a day for work. Frankly, I want a plug in hybrid truck but noone really wants to make one and in an application like that, the fuel savings WOULD BE HUGE. I drive a ford F-350 that's fitted out as a tool truck and often pull a trailer. It's HEAVY and I get around 8MPG. If I could charge something like that at home and supplement the electric power with gas power when needed, I could cut my fuel costs in half, maybe more. Then there are other things like Longhaul trucking where we're probably going to be using chemical fuels for a couple decades until megawatt level charging and battery packs become a thing. We might see a future where chemical fuels are only allowed in commercial vehicles.

The thing is, we need multiple options and for people who have the ability to charge at home, which is most people, EVs COULD be the most the most cost effective form of personal transportation. If manufacturers would get off their bullshit and make a cheaper EV they would look a whole lot more appealing and China has shown that it is entirely possible to make cheap EVs. Car makers don't want to make cheap cars, they want to make high margin high profit vehicles. The problem is that not everyone can afford expensive high margin vehicles and they are just sitting on lots right now. We aren't in a market where everyone is getting an extra$25,000 a year of free covid money and record low interest rates. Now I'm seeing 7 to 10 year loans just so people can afford the base model and then the insurance is almost as much as their car payment. That's a different story, though.

China has proven that EVs can be cheap, they don't all have to cost 50-60k and the US solution to them is to ban them. That's not how a free market works.

On a side note, my favorite application for EV's is electric bikes but we are getting to the point where people are going to have to start getting a licsense for them as there are too many kids running in and out of traffic and on side walks with them. I have a Revv1up and it's my favorite way to get around when I go on vacation. A simple modification and it gets 200 miles of range topping out at 35mph, which is plenty. Me and my wife both have one and they fit in the back of our minivan perfectly when we go on trips and we can charge them up in our hotel room over right. 200 miles of range on an e-bike is a lot cheaper and easier to get than 200 miles of range on a car. Nothing like cruising by the ocean on a bike. She made me sell my motorcycle years ago but the ebike has been a fantastic middle ground.
 
Keep making the charging stations! Just because electric vehicles sales are dropping doesn’t mean they will continue to drop .

Many people aren’t buying them BECAUSE there aren’t enough charging stations - get more and maybe people will change their minds.

Still, it would be nice if you could charge your car as fast as you could fill a gas tank… that tech, if/when it happens will be the game changer.
 
Keep making the charging stations! Just because electric vehicles sales are dropping doesn’t mean they will continue to drop .

Many people aren’t buying them BECAUSE there aren’t enough charging stations - get more and maybe people will change their minds.

Still, it would be nice if you could charge your car as fast as you could fill a gas tank… that tech, if/when it happens will be the game changer.
Here is an interesting thing that's happening, we are currently training employees for a new type of wireless charger that goes in the concrete in parking garages for apartment complexes. This solves 2 issues. 1, they're allegedly cheaper than regular charging stations(we haven't installed any yet, it's a startup company trying to create a standard)2, it keeps junkies from stealing the charging cables and damaging the charging stations. The funny thing about Charging cables is that they don't actually contain that much copper. They're liquid cooled so they can handle higher power with less wire.
 
I think this is important but even as someone who's living in one of the worst states for EVs (Iowa) there's still plenty of charging stations along the major routes I would be taking. More is neat and all, but the reason I stopped looking at EVs for my next car is their extreme unreliability compared to Japanese ICEs. They just have way too many issues, but they're not necessarily *mechanical* ones you can just fix. They're software, battery, or charging related, which are catastrophic. Look up the Ioniq 5 issues where you can get stranded and the rate of those is greater than ICE stuff. It's a shame because I love the idea of electric
 
Demand may have dropped for EV's right now, but the demand for chargers has not. We absolutely must build more chargers or America will be last. Politics will not stop climate change. That is coming no matter what. When the first dust storms hit the southern parts of America, I plan on rubbing conservatives face in it as much as possible if I am still alive.
 
Installing level 2 chargers isn't forward looking. Level 3 should be the minimum, so as faster charging cars become affordable, people won't be too concerned about long charge times when traveling.
 
I think this is important but even as someone who's living in one of the worst states for EVs (Iowa) there's still plenty of charging stations along the major routes I would be taking. More is neat and all, but the reason I stopped looking at EVs for my next car is their extreme unreliability compared to Japanese ICEs. They just have way too many issues, but they're not necessarily *mechanical* ones you can just fix. They're software, battery, or charging related, which are catastrophic. Look up the Ioniq 5 issues where you can get stranded and the rate of those is greater than ICE stuff. It's a shame because I love the idea of electric
Personally, I think you are conflating Tesla's EVs with EVs in general.

I think what you are saying about EVs applies in the vast majority of cases to Tesla's EVs, but not to EVs in general.
 
Installing level 2 chargers isn't forward looking. Level 3 should be the minimum, so as faster charging cars become affordable, people won't be too concerned about long charge times when traveling.
Some EVs and PHEVs cannot use Level 3 charging.

I don't know anything about the backing electrical infrastructure for the Level 2 chargers that they are installing, however, if that infrastructure is capable of supporting Level 3 chargers, then I'd say there is at least an iota of a forward-looking mindset to the installation of these Level 2 chargers.

As well, according to this https://www.techspot.com/community/...ut-dc-fast-charging-is-bad-news.296071/unread Level 3 charging ages EV batteries prematurely. We will need better battery technology before Level 3 charging can become ubiquitous.

One of the reasons why EVs did not survive in the early 1900's was because of a lack of charging infrastructure. Building out a charging infrastructure is something that is necessary for wider adoption of EVs, IMO.
 
Personally, I think you are conflating Tesla's EVs with EVs in general.

I think what you are saying about EVs applies in the vast majority of cases to Tesla's EVs, but not to EVs in general.
It's inverse. Consumer Reports has the largest and most complete database on car troubles in America and the Model Y is the most reliable EV. Everyone else is struggling badly.
 
Some EVs and PHEVs cannot use Level 3 charging.

I don't know anything about the backing electrical infrastructure for the Level 2 chargers that they are installing, however, if that infrastructure is capable of supporting Level 3 chargers, then I'd say there is at least an iota of a forward-looking mindset to the installation of these Level 2 chargers.

As well, according to this https://www.techspot.com/community/...ut-dc-fast-charging-is-bad-news.296071/unread Level 3 charging ages EV batteries prematurely. We will need better battery technology before Level 3 charging can become ubiquitous.

One of the reasons why EVs did not survive in the early 1900's was because of a lack of charging infrastructure. Building out a charging infrastructure is something that is necessary for wider adoption of EVs, IMO.
The only EVs that can't do level 3 are ancient eco models that are going out of production. Tesla has long disproven "fast charging gonna kill the batteries" nonsense.
 
Back