Android sideloading faces new restrictions as Google blocks unverified developers

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,515   +935
Staff
Facepalm: The Android ecosystem has traditionally offered a more permissive approach to app development and delivery through third-party means. Now, Google is announcing a significant change that will likely disappoint both developers and users that rely on sideloading for their app needs.

Google recently said that every app developer within the Android ecosystem will soon require full identification by the company. The tech giant presented the massive change as an additional layer of security against malware and scams, because apps coming from third-party sources are allegedly spreading 50 times more malware than apps downloaded from Google Play.

The mandatory developer identification is comparable to an ID check at the airport, Google stated, and is designed to impose more accountability on app makers. All apps will need to have an official identification badge from Google if the developers want to deliver them on certified Android devices, which essentially means that almost all Android phones and tablets outside China will force developers to identify themselves.

Google also confirmed that identification will not come with an "official" review of an app's content or functionality. Some Reddit users speculated that Mountain View will likely review some apps behind closed doors, particularly the ones that could go against its business interests. Developer ID could thus be "weaponized" against potential competitors, despite Google stating that the change is only to improve Android security.

The corporation reminds everyone that developer identification has been mandatory for Google Play apps since 2023, a change that proved to be "helpful" in stopping bad actors and malware creators. Extending a similar approach to sideloaded apps should provide a common security baseline across the whole Android ecosystem.

To make things easier, Google is working on a new Android Developer Console where developers working outside Google Play can register themselves. Hobbyists and students, who likely have different needs from commercial entities, will have their own customized Developer Console.

Google provided a timeline to help developers adapt to the new mandatory ID. Early access of the feature will begin in October this year, while official identification will open for all developers in March 2026. Come September 2026, the rule will go into effect in some local markets, including Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. The new requirements should be rolled out globally sometime in 2027 and beyond.

The corporation stated that developers will continue to have "the same freedom" to share their apps with users through direct sideloading, or even to use alternative app stores. However, sideloading is becoming an increasingly contentious issue for Google's mobile business, especially now that Epic Games is winning its legal fight against mobile walled gardens.

Permalink to story:

 
If I'm side loading then I'm already circumventing their developer restrictions, sooooooo. When do I just get to install Linux on my phone without jumping through google loopholes?
 
This seems absurd to me; the whole point of side loading is to install stuff Google doesn't approve of on the Play store. And of course Google itself has come under legal hot water for anti-trust issues lately, losing 3 different cases recently (with the legal punishments for those cases still being decided), with one of those cases they lost being directly about how they handle third party stores/apps on Android. Do they want more legal issues?

 
I propose a compromise. Completely unrestricted side-loading will void your warranty and no banking apps can be used until a full OS reload is conducted on the device.
 
I propose a compromise. Completely unrestricted side-loading will void your warranty and no banking apps can be used until a full OS reload is conducted on the device.
There is no need to compromise here. If I own a device, I should be the one who decides what software can run on it. Its my problem if I am dumb and install something bad, not Google's. Plus we all know Google will also use this sort of thing to try and block ad-blockers and privacy software if given the chance.
 
I propose a compromise. Completely unrestricted side-loading will void your warranty and no banking apps can be used until a full OS reload is conducted on the device.
You think that is a good idea? It's not.

I fail to see how that's a compromise.
It's not so much that as it is as lacking as Google's ideas.

There is no need to compromise here. If I own a device, I should be the one who decides what software can run on it. Its my problem if I am dumb and install something bad, not Google's. Plus we all know Google will also use this sort of thing to try and block ad-blockers and privacy software if given the chance.
100% the correct point of view.
 
The compromise is that you can still do it, you just lose some rights afterwards until the device is put back into a standard state or condition.
 
The compromise is that you can still do it, you just lose some rights afterwards until the device is put back into a standard state or condition.
And the point we objectors are making is that your suggestion is entirely unacceptable. Google needs to find a better and smarter way of securing things WITHOUT infringing on user rights and capabilities.
 
You know what the definition of a compromise is, right? It’s a situation that in the end, nobody is truly satisfied.
 
You know what the definition of a compromise is, right? It’s a situation that in the end, nobody is truly satisfied.
Correct. That is what makes it completely unacceptable. Google needs to do better and arrive at a solution that offers better security AND does not infringe on user rights.
 
Last edited:
As long as I can continue to update HyperOS apps via MemeOS Enhancer app, I'm good. If not, I'll be okay.
 
Apple allows side loading from 3rd party devs?
No, but if the apps I sideload are going to get banned because of this, then what is the functional difference?

Android is a meh OS we put up with because it gives us a degree of freedom that apple refuses to allow. If Google is going to kneecap that freedom, then why would I continue to use an inferior OS with worse support?
The compromise is that you can still do it, you just lose some rights afterwards until the device is put back into a standard state or condition.
There is no reason to do so. Secure apps are sandboxed in android, sideloading an app should not disable them.

This is a play for more control and profit, full stop. It does not benefit the end user nor does it improve the experience.
 
Googles Android is both open source (AOSP) for OEMs to develop their own variants, and closed source for their Google Mobile Service like Google Play Store, maps and others. I tend to think Google is going to wait to see if the EU comes after them and may cite copyright and IP of the Google Playstore. This is just a big complicated mess. But Google is working on another Developer Console to work outside the Playstore which might be good but what stipulations will that have?
 
Googles Android is both open source (AOSP) for OEMs to develop their own variants, and closed source for their Google Mobile Service like Google Play Store, maps and others. I tend to think Google is going to wait to see if the EU comes after them and may cite copyright and IP of the Google Playstore. This is just a big complicated mess. But Google is working on another Developer Console to work outside the Playstore which might be good but what stipulations will that have?
We already know the stipulations for the public facing one: You must submit real world ID to google and dox yourself to get approval for their platform.

Their alternative is for students, so I can guarantee with a very comfortable bet that the results of that console will be restricted to devices managed by that same account, with time constraints and access restraints, ece.
 
My phone, I'll install the apps I WANT. But, looks like google is going the way of ios and going to lock everything down just so they can get "real ID" approval or some other garbage.
 
If I'm side loading then I'm already circumventing their developer restrictions, sooooooo. When do I just get to install Linux on my phone without jumping through google loopholes?

And why can't your Linux distro have a developer ID?
 
Android is a meh OS we put up with because it gives us a degree of freedom that apple refuses to allow. If Google is going to kneecap that freedom, then why would I continue to use an inferior OS with worse support?

I'm anti-Apple, out of principle, but honestly, they are excellent at what they do: both hardware and software. On Android and Windows, we are putting up with second- and third-rate rubbish. Sometimes, one wonders why.
 
I guess it's fairphone time. Or some Chinese phones. Time to de-google.

I have a few apps I wrote myself to help me integrating some stuff. I got Android just to be sure I can run it freely. If they would try to take away this option (or request my personla data so I can continue to use my device), I'm going for Huawei. It is a better hardware anyway.

And for the compromises, there is no compromises. It's like some guy is knocking to your door and saying: hay, lets make a compromise. I will be parking on your driveway, and to make it up I wont be shitting on your lawn. That's how compromises works.
 
Back