F-Droid warns crackdown on Android app sideloading could kill open app stores

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,515   +935
Staff
The takeaway: App sideloading has been a contentious issue since the dawn of mobile computing. Google is now taking a hardline approach, citing alleged security concerns, but a major app platform is warning against the company's attempt to eliminate alternative stores entirely.

F-Droid is raising alarms over Google's recent decision to strictly limit app sideloading on Android. After 15 years on the market, the alternative app store now faces possible closure, with Mountain View reportedly aiming to tighten its de facto monopoly over the once-open mobile platform.

F-Droid is a catalog of free and open-source apps designed for Android. The service provides a vetted repository of secure apps, selected from open-source projects that avoid anti-user features such as tracking or advertising. The F-Droid team reviews every app in the catalog to ensure it contains no "anti-features" before making it available to users.

Every F-Droid app package is signed with a cryptographic key, and the source code is publicly accessible. Users can also download individual apps directly from the project's website, bypassing the "official" store entirely. According to F-Droid, this model offers an elegant and proven way to distribute apps that are safe, useful, and designed solely in the user's best interest.

F-Droid's model is now at risk after Google recently decided that every Android app developer must register an account on its centralized platform. Under the new rules, app creators will be required to pay a registration fee, accept constantly changing terms and conditions, and provide personally identifiable documentation, including government-issued IDs.

"If it were to be put into effect, the developer registration decree will end the F-Droid project and other free/open-source app distribution sources as we know them today," F-Droid's "marcprux" warns.

Google is framing its latest restrictions on sideloading as a security measure. While sideloading may carry theoretical risks, malware and other security threats continue to appear regularly on Google Play. Corporate-enforced gatekeeping does not inherently make a platform safer; instead, it primarily reduces diversity and threatens the open-source ecosystem.

F-Droid points out that Google already has a robust remediation mechanism through Play Protect, which should be sufficient to handle security threats without restricting direct app installation. The organization emphasizes that the freedom to run any software on a computing platform should remain a fundamental right on both computers and mobile devices.

In addition, F-Droid is calling on developers and users to help resist Google's anti-competitive measures. The organization encourages people to contact their representatives in the US, Europe, and elsewhere to demand that open app distribution be preserved. Regulators may also take a second look at Mountain View's dominance in the mobile software market.

Permalink to story:

 
In doing so Google has destroyed one of the biggest pillars holding up the Android ecosystem. If I can only use official apps that Google has determined are acceptable, what is the advantage over iOS?

Customizability, the ability to run unofficial apps, and availability of more affordable devices are the core strengths of Android. The second is seriously hampered by Google's demands, and the third has been done in by years of inflation where even moto G devices are now $400 while pixel devices cost as much as iphones.

The 4th pillar was usable removable storage but Google systemically smothered that already, only a burnt husk remains.

What these developers need to do is boycott Google, come together, and provide an alternative source for usage. A fork of android with a focus on actually being open source would be a major step.
 
Hopefully the recent antitrust proceeding takes notice of this and, as a remedy, prevents Google from doing this.
This here - I mean Google recently lost an anti-trust case filed by Epic Games specifically over their treatment of third party app stores on Android; the legal remedies are still being hashed out at the moment. Hopefully on of Epic's lawyers sets this in front of the judge and points out that it would be absurd for developers using Epic's app store to have to seek Google's permission to publish Android apps.
 
Every software company's end goal is to be locked down, I don't quite understand why.

It should be illegal to restrict what software someone can put on hardware they own.
They are not locking down your hardware, you can technically put whatever you want on it.
 
Every software company's end goal is to be locked down, I don't quite understand why.
Money, greed, control.
They are not locking down your hardware, you can technically put whatever you want on it.
They ARE locking down your hardware, by restricting what can be installed to signed apps approved by Google. So no, you cannot *technically* put whatever you want on your phone, once these rules go into effect. Even if you allow sideloading any sideloaded app not approved by Google will get automatically uninstalled.
 
Well turns out Google is more evil than Microsoft now Go figure. Microsoft still lets anybody install anything they want onto Windows as long as it is a win32 or win64. Interesting
 
Well turns out Google is more evil than Microsoft now Go figure. Microsoft still lets anybody install anything they want onto Windows as long as it is a win32 or win64. Interesting
Not for lack of trying. MS tried exactly this with window s8, announcing that "metro apps" were the future and that Win 3 would be "depreciated" at some point. The result was massive pushback and developers flocking to move away from win32 to platform agnostic designs. MS got spooked into abandoning the idea.

Since then they've murmured about removing Win32 several times. Smart App Control is MS's version of what Google is proposing, forcing software to be whitelisted by MS before it can be installed, giving them complete control of the platform.

The only thing holding them back is the consequences of dropping legacy support, mainly losing all their business customers at once.
 
EVERYONE that owns a Android powered phone, needs to tell google that if they go all lock down, they will switch to Apple phones.
Shoot, the only reason I chose Android over Apple "back in the day" was because Android was open source and I could open the bootloader, side load and set up the phone MY WAY, not how some programmer thinks I should operate it!
If this goes through, I might just as well switch to Apple...
 
EVERYONE that owns a Android powered phone, needs to tell google that if they go all lock down, they will switch to Apple phones.
Shoot, the only reason I chose Android over Apple "back in the day" was because Android was open source and I could open the bootloader, side load and set up the phone MY WAY, not how some programmer thinks I should operate it!
If this goes through, I might just as well switch to Apple...
I've seen speculation online that if you switch to an alternate flavor of Android - like Graphene - you'll still be able to do this.

I might end up needing two phones if this ends up happening: one that is untouched, vanilla, locked-down, and corporate approved, that only exists to have banking apps on it; and another that is either iOS or running an alternative fork of Android that I actually control. IDK what that will end up looking like, as I get the impression these plans from Google are still being formed and may end up changed or rolled back either in-part or in whole (the way MS Recall was """rolled back""")
 
EVERYONE that owns a Android powered phone, needs to tell google that if they go all lock down, they will switch to Apple phones.
Shoot, the only reason I chose Android over Apple "back in the day" was because Android was open source and I could open the bootloader, side load and set up the phone MY WAY, not how some programmer thinks I should operate it!
If this goes through, I might just as well switch to Apple...

no can't switch to apple, I would rather be drowned in a river of gasoline than ever use an apple product again.
 
I've seen speculation online that if you switch to an alternate flavor of Android - like Graphene - you'll still be able to do this.

I might end up needing two phones if this ends up happening: one that is untouched, vanilla, locked-down, and corporate approved, that only exists to have banking apps on it; and another that is either iOS or running an alternative fork of Android that I actually control. IDK what that will end up looking like, as I get the impression these plans from Google are still being formed and may end up changed or rolled back either in-part or in whole (the way MS Recall was """rolled back""")
You can do it with an alternative version of Android, in the same way you can runa fork of Chromium and keep manifest V2 extensions.

The auto blocking of non signed apps is going to be baked directly into the OS, and likely will be done in a way that breaks Play compatibility if removed. So sure, you can do it, youll just have to give up any and all compatibility with app stores to do so, and anything relying on the trust model like banking apps will break. Assuming you can even strip it.

And since bootloaders are also getting locked down, good luck loading this alternative OS on any phone you can get your hands on.
no can't switch to apple, I would rather be drowned in a river of gasoline than ever use an apple product again.
If your customization gets locked down and you are limited to Google approved apps, what is the functional difference anymore?
 
no can't switch to apple, I would rather be drowned in a river of gasoline than ever use an apple product again.
I understand the pain...my skin crawls thinking about switching. But, SOMEHOW we need to stand up to Google by either switching to Apple, or another android OS that still allows sideloading, but banking apps will still work. Or some sort of "dual boot" mode.
 
I believe it's not Android it's Googles Mobile Service that locks the phone down since GMS is proprietary. Even if Android is sold, Goggle can still keep their GMS. Of course there are many de-googled phones that work fine with just Android, but there are billions of phones with GMS.
 
I understand the pain...my skin crawls thinking about switching. But, SOMEHOW we need to stand up to Google by either switching to Apple, or another android OS that still allows sideloading, but banking apps will still work. Or some sort of "dual boot" mode.
No I'm not going to switch from one evil company to the other evil company they're both equally bad and evil so I'm going to use the one that I find tolerable
 
Back