Apple's latest ad pokes fun at the Windows CrowdStrike BSOD disaster

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,476   +75
Staff
Winners & losers: Apple's new eight-minute ad takes a thinly veiled jab at last year's CrowdStrike meltdown – the software update that crashed Windows systems running critical infrastructure around the world. Beyond the humor, the short film highlights the differences between how Windows and macOS secure their kernels, which was the root cause behind last year's incident.

Last year's infamous CrowdStrike incident was a stark reminder of how fragile Windows systems can be when something goes wrong at the kernel level. The global outage crippled hospitals, airports, and broadcasters – a failure that macOS and Linux users largely watched from the sidelines. Now, 15 months later, Apple is turning that moment into a pointed lesson about platform security.

The ad opens with a packaging company using various Apple tools, including the Apple Watch, AirDrop, NameDrop, Siri, and iPhone mirroring. When the employees encounter a rival company implied to be using Windows devices at a convention, a mass BSOD crash knocks every system at the event offline – except the Apple devices.

An IT technician then explains that the Macs avoided the problem because they manage security without granting kernel-level access to third-party software.

Although the ad doesn't specifically name Microsoft, Windows, or CrowdStrike, it clearly references the disaster from last July. The incident affected hospitals, airports, train stations, broadcast stations, and other vital infrastructure.

Many Mac and Linux users joked that their devices stayed online because the issue only affected Windows. The outage occurred after CrowdStrike deployed a defective rapid response content update to its Falcon sensor on Windows systems. The faulty configuration triggered a logic error that caused affected machines to crash and BSOD. Because macOS and most Linux distributions handle updates differently – and restrict third-party software from directly interacting with critical system components – their systems were unaffected.

Microsoft has long faced scrutiny for exposing the deepest layer of its operating system to third-party developers. However, the company has noted that a 2009 agreement with the European Union compels it to do so. Since then, Microsoft has revised how security contractors interact with the Windows kernel to prevent a repeat of the infamous incident.

Recalling Apple's "Get a Mac" campaign, which mocked Windows as unstable and insecure between 2006 and 2009, this week's new short film feels like a modern revival of that rivalry.

Rather than advertising a specific product, the ad underscores Apple's broader security philosophy, emphasizing its use of end-to-end encryption, custom Arm-based silicon with built-in security features, a tightly controlled kernel, and the option to limit software installation to the official App Store.

Permalink to story:

 
A few clicks away from this article: "Installing Windows 11 without a Microsoft account just got harder".

So, what do the users want? Freedom, or security? The freedom to choose the third-party app that can crash their system, or the security from all the apps that would free them from corporate censorship and control.

Microsoft has a hard on for locking down the kernel, Crowdstrike was just what they needed. And (some of) the media laps it up like dogs (to be clear, not accusing _this_ publication).
 
Not fair. Windows has to accommodate huge range of hardware and apps. Apple only has its own hardware, fewer applications to polish.
What can MS do when a CPU company prints tens of thousands defectie CPU, for example?
 
I have tried copying nicely formatted text into Pages recently, was quite disgusted.
Dunno about Keynotes they showcase though.
 
Apple's new eight-minute ad…
Eight minutes?! I loath ads, but sure, I’ll watch one for a bit if it’s funny and creative. I bailed at the 2-minute mark. Not even remotely funny or creative enough to keep me engaged long enough to deliver the punch line—leaving me as, if not more, irritated at the time wasted to get that far. I mean, seriously? What a waste of 2-minutes of life.

Result: I’m now less enthralled with Apple before I watched—and I do own some Apple products and pretty much hate modern Windows so… Good grief. What a backfire in my book. Eight minutes… FFS.
 
Apple is consistent, from the first version of OSX the operation almost the same except more strict protection of screen sharing ... etc. It didn't force user's to join domain, it still works, Time Machine works fine and easy, while the PC side with Windows like roller coaster from version to version, now even block the local account setup, if the price is right I have no choice but goes to Apple.

And the Linux people screaming but please let the printer and other drivers works first, also the language input method really not good enough. Companies did not want the risk except you have a Boss that use Linux.
 
And the Linux people screaming but please let the printer and other drivers works first, also the language input method really not good enough. Companies did not want the risk except you have a Boss that use Linux.
I have a fun little bit of trivia for you, Linux uses CUPS (common Unix print server) for printing. Know who else uses that and even developed it? Apple.
So if it works on one but not the other either blame the printer manufacturer or it's a case of PEBKAC.
Ill take the language input over that of windows which keeps installing additional languages that can't be removed no matter what I do. I just want US international, not UK and whatever else it has downloaded.

As for other drivers, the very latest hardware often lags behind a bit, which isn't something that can be fixed by anyone else besides the hardware manufacturers. For everything else it's amazing compared to widows imo, that scanner from 1998 and printer from 2002? paperweights under windows. Plug and play under linux (windows changing is driver model from 98ME to NT to Vista really didnt do legacy hardware any favours. Add to that drivers only being available inside .exe files that check the platform they're on very lazily so that Vista drivers don't work under later versions although they likely would if they just tried instead of preventing the install...
 
Another good thing about Linux is there is no MSOffice, so there's hope something more streamlined, legacy-free and bug-n-workaround free will appear in its place eventually (Zimbra?). One by one, I got disappointed in almost all of MSOffice programs, starting from Visio (worst) to Project Server (probably best).
As for the base OS, Kaspersky is re-building a micro-kernel since nobody actually uses one (hello QNX), but there is little hope for us - more for them in the Shanghai Organization.
 
Back