Riot's always-on anti-cheat is finally getting an off switch

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,117   +62
Staff

Riot Games is changing how its Vanguard anti-cheat runs on PCs, pulling back from its always-on behavior and limiting when it's active on players' machines. With a new update, Vanguard will no longer automatically start when a PC boots – at least not for everyone. Instead, it can run only while a game is active and shuts down when play ends. That brings Riot in line with other kernel-level anti-cheat systems that typically run only while you're playing instead of staying in the background all the time.

Vanguard's behavior has been under scrutiny since it launched in 2020, so the change isn't a minor one. The software runs at the kernel level, giving it broad access to a system's inner workings. That access helps catch advanced cheats, but it also means Vanguard ran with elevated privileges and was constantly running. For some users, that combination has been a sticking point.

Riot is not abandoning that architecture, but it is changing how and when it's used. In announcing the update, Riot's anti-cheat chief Phillip Koskinas made clear the change only applies to PCs that meet specific security requirements.

"Starting later today, the universally beloved anti-cheat product, Vanguard, will begin to support on-demand sessions from all sufficiently secured PC devices," Koskinas sarcastically wrote.

The key phrase there is "sufficiently secured." Vanguard will only step back from its always-on behavior if a system meets a defined set of security requirements. Otherwise, it will continue to run as it has.

Koskinas explained that "on-demand" means Vanguard's driver will no longer launch when Windows starts, but only on systems that meet the company's modern security requirements. Those systems rely on pre-boot security mechanisms and Windows' built-in protections, allowing Vanguard to shut down when it's no longer needed. He jokingly added that users would even get a few pixels of taskbar space back.

Those pre-boot and system-level protections show Riot is tying Vanguard's behavior more closely to the security features built into modern PCs. Instead of relying solely on its own persistent monitoring, the company is leaning more heavily on Windows' built-in safeguards, including UEFI Secure Boot, TPM 2.0, virtualization-based security, hypervisor-protected code integrity, and IOMMU.

In practical terms, Riot is trading constant oversight for stronger baseline security. By relying on the platform's built-in protections to secure the boot process and isolate sensitive operations, Vanguard no longer needs to remain active at all times to maintain system integrity.

Not every player will see the benefit right away. Riot estimates that about 35% of its users already meet the requirements for the new on-demand mode, and the option will appear automatically for them after the update. Everyone else faces a more involved path. The requirements include running Windows 11 25H2 or later and enabling several security features that are often turned off by default. Some of those settings – particularly Secure Boot or TPM – may require changes in the system BIOS, which can be unfamiliar territory for less technical users.

Even so, the direction is clear. Riot is keeping its kernel-level approach intact while dialing back how intrusive it feels in day-to-day use. The software still operates with deep system access when active, but it no longer has to be a constant presence.

Permalink to story:

 
Willingly allowing any 3rd party application from some random company ability to scan all of your activities from online payments to key logging is just crazy.

I hope you’ve never installed a driver in your life. Or any RGB or peripheral software or things like Afterburner. Otherwise I have bad news for you.
 
I hope you’ve never installed a driver in your life. Or any RGB or peripheral software or things like Afterburner. Otherwise I have bad news for you.
Oh, I had no idea drivers are made by shady companies and they continuously send home unknown data from my pc;)

/s
 
Fine with me. I only play games on my Windows partition. All my important stuff is on Linux on a different drive.
 
I take it one step further. Always Linux. If a game company doesn't allow Linux I just don't play it.
Did you Read through all code line for line? How do you know that Linux distro doesn't have any backdoors. Just playing devil's advocate
 
And still no Linux support.

This is why Linux is DOA for Gaming unless you are a casual.
Meh, I just don't play the games that don't allow Linux. Don't want my money? Fine by me. Ill keep playing all my MMO's, multiplayer shooters and other games that work.
 
Not even on a cold day in hell would I ever install RIOT games.
Riot Games does not publish total lifetime install numbers . However, the company boasts over 200 million combined monthly active users across its flagship titles .

you would think you would hear of more horror stories?
listen I would prefer not to install it, but the anti cheat does work. if you have ever played cs2 vs valorant you would know. I wish I didnt play comp titles like this. if I didnt I would go to linux and never come back..
 
Last edited:
Meh, I just don't play the games that don't allow Linux. Don't want my money? Fine by me. Ill keep playing all my MMO's, multiplayer shooters and other games that work.
That is the Linux gaming spirit - avoid all good games that don't work and tell yourself you don't miss out, hahah.

This is why no-one builds high-end gaming machines and then installs Linux. Pointless really. Very limited game catalog. Much worse performance overall. Zero dev support. Zero driver support.

Running Linux on a new gaming machine is like buying a top tier OLED TV just to watch old VHS movies. Some won't even work. The ones that do work, comes with worse quality and just more issues in general.

And this is why 98% of PC gamers won't touch Linux.
 
That is the Linux gaming spirit - avoid all good games that don't work and tell yourself you don't miss out, hahah.

This is why no-one builds high-end gaming machines and then installs Linux. Pointless really. Very limited game catalog. Much worse performance overall. Zero dev support. Zero driver support.

Running Linux on a new gaming machine is like buying a top tier OLED TV just to watch old VHS movies. Some won't even work. The ones that do work, comes with worse quality and just more issues in general.

And this is why 98% of PC gamers won't touch Linux.
The only games I cannot play are competitive shooters I do not care about. However, Blizzard seems to have done somthing right, as all of their games work on Linux. Overwatch included. Which is a competitive shooter. Marvel Rivals works as well. Valve games work too. The godfather of competitive shooters? Counterstrike? Odd how these devs seem to allow Linux, yet others just stamp a big "NO" on their games.

Every game that me and my friends choose to play has worked flawlessly on my rig. Even when a new game drops I just load it up.

Much worse performance? Are you living under a rock? CachyOS/Bazzite consistently go neck and neck or outpace Windows in performance. This is WHILE running a translation layer.

Again with the worse quality? You have no idea what you are talking about.

Linux is growing. It will continue to grow if Microsoft keeps ****ing up like they have been. My friends have been hit with multiple issues recently, yet it is smooth sailing for me.
 
Riot Games does not publish total lifetime install numbers . However, the company boasts over 200 million combined monthly active users across its flagship titles .

you would think you would hear of more horror stories?
listen I would prefer not to install it, but the anti cheat does work. if you have ever played cs2 vs valorant you would know. I wish I didnt play comp titles like this. if I didnt I would go to linux and never come back..
You would prefer not to install kernel level anti cheats, but don't do anything about it. 🤔
 
The only games I cannot play are competitive shooters I do not care about. However, Blizzard seems to have done somthing right, as all of their games work on Linux. Overwatch included. Which is a competitive shooter. Marvel Rivals works as well. Valve games work too. The godfather of competitive shooters? Counterstrike? Odd how these devs seem to allow Linux, yet others just stamp a big "NO" on their games.

Every game that me and my friends choose to play has worked flawlessly on my rig. Even when a new game drops I just load it up.

Much worse performance? Are you living under a rock? CachyOS/Bazzite consistently go neck and neck or outpace Windows in performance. This is WHILE running a translation layer.

Again with the worse quality? You have no idea what you are talking about.

Linux is growing. It will continue to grow if Microsoft keeps ****ing up like they have been. My friends have been hit with multiple issues recently, yet it is smooth sailing for me.
CS is riddled with cheaters to a degree where serious and pro players don't play on public servers, good pick there - FACEIT, ESEA - Is where serious CS players play.
Overwatch is dying literally. Marvel Rivals is a joke. Both have Mixed or Mostly Negative on Steam. Meh titles.

Linux have much worse performance overall, still a fact. Just because you cherrypick a single game out of 1000s does not mean Linux is even close to Windows overall. More games work due to Proton which is nothing but a comp. layer, that eats 10-25% performance on average due to API calls/redirects.

Game developers don't care at all if games work or don't work in Linux. Full focus on Windows, hence why Windows is required, says in the game requirements.

You have absolutely no clue about high level PC gaming. I bet you use old hardware, playing old games, like most people claiming Linux is good for gaming.

9800X3D, RTX 4090 and 500 Hz OLED says hi. I know how games are supposed to run and Linux is pure trash for competitive play, hence why no serious PC gamers are using Linux.

Linux is growing. Yeah, hahha, gained 1% in like 5% years.

Steam marketshare: Windows at 95% the last 5% is shared between Linux and MacOS.

The 2-3% Linux marketshare is shared between 25+ distros, shows the massive fragmentation problem Linux has.

So nah, have been using Linux for like 20 years. I don't even bother to use it for gaming, because I know how lacking it still is overall. Lets see in 5-10 years. For now, Windows absolutely is the only place to be for serious PC gamers using newer hardware, playing newer games. The more casual gamers, can use Linux and MacOS if they want, freedom is nice right? Enjoy being limited by a lacking game catalog, while playing games with overall worse performance.
 
CS is riddled with cheaters to a degree where serious and pro players don't play on public servers, good pick there - FACEIT, ESEA - Is where serious CS players play.
Overwatch is dying literally. Marvel Rivals is a joke. Both have Mixed or Mostly Negative on Steam. Meh titles.

Linux have much worse performance overall, still a fact. Just because you cherrypick a single game out of 1000s does not mean Linux is even close to Windows overall. More games work due to Proton which is nothing but a comp. layer, that eats 10-25% performance on average due to API calls/redirects.

Game developers don't care at all if games work or don't work in Linux. Full focus on Windows, hence why Windows is required, says in the game requirements.

You have absolutely no clue about high level PC gaming. I bet you use old hardware, playing old games, like most people claiming Linux is good for gaming.

9800X3D, RTX 4090 and 500 Hz OLED says hi. I know how games are supposed to run and Linux is pure trash for competitive play, hence why no serious PC gamers are using Linux.

Linux is growing. Yeah, hahha, gained 1% in like 5% years.

Steam marketshare: Windows at 95% the last 5% is shared between Linux and MacOS.

The 2-3% Linux marketshare is shared between 25+ distros, shows the massive fragmentation problem Linux has.

So nah, have been using Linux for like 20 years. I don't even bother to use it for gaming, because I know how lacking it still is overall. Lets see in 5-10 years. For now, Windows absolutely is the only place to be for serious PC gamers using newer hardware, playing newer games. The more casual gamers, can use Linux and MacOS if they want, freedom is nice right? Enjoy being limited by a lacking game catalog, while playing games with overall worse performance.
I wouldnt say a 9800X3D, 9070XT and a 165Hz monitor is "old" hardware. Hell, my 9070 is three years newer than your 4090, grandpa. You also completly ignored the fact that I said I play new games when they drop. I still have a Windows drive and test these "performance drops" you talk about. Yeah, no. The difference is nowhere near 10-25%. I am done with this conversation, though. If people refuse to make the switch Microsoft will keep making Windows crappier and crappier. Have fun on your knees before your Microsoft overlords.
 
You would prefer not to install kernel level anti cheats, but don't do anything about it. 🤔
what would you like me to do about it? valorant is the game I play. and yes I have told support ide like linux support. so yeah I did my part.

faceit? ha. kernel level access just like valorant
 
@Axiarus :-

You're wasting your time even interacting with our "superior" friend above, much less debating anything with him. The guy is convinced he's better than everybody else, and "looks down" on the rest of us.

Also - like many others - he seems convinced the ONLY games worth playing are every top-end AAA+ game that's released. Doesn't seem to realise there's a ton of folks out there who don't care about the AAA+ tier; I honestly believe that, in HIS book, if you don't play that stuff, it's because you can't......and if your hardware was good enough, of course you'd play 'em (because, why wouldn't you?)

In all honesty, the percentage of gamers worldwide that can afford to drop a huge wedge on all the latest, most expensive gear all the time is pretty small. I've been online almost since the web was born, and folks like our friend above always seem to inhabit their own little 'perfect' world, pitying everyone else around them. Don't get that, personally; if their world IS so 'perfect', why the apparent 'need' to lord it over others? :dizzy:

I don't think he understands the concept of "different strokes for different folks"!

(shrug...)


Miq. :neutral:
 
Last edited:
Indeed. I have him in my ignore list. It's not immediately obvious, but when moving the mouse to the user name the option to Ignore pops up. Unfortunately this does not block seeing their messages when someone else quotes them, but I suppose it's better than nothing.
 
Back