I love how people say windows ten is quicker,yet I haven't seen any proof when comparing on my own PC.
When ever I've done a few benchmarks,from running a few games benchmarks to apps that test ram and cpu,the difference is so small you couldn't feel it.
I've run a start up test that shows 7 to be quicker than 10 and,10 and 8,1 on par with each other.
Just had a week of installing 10 and now 8,1 and of the benchmarks I ran there was only a couple percentage points between them,all on my PC,the only difference are the drivers.
I can't run 7 now because the bios that support the new Ryzen cpu's don't seem to work but 8,1 and newer works.
The only downside of 8,1 is that I can't run Cyberpunk because CDPR hasn't heard of vulkan,fortunately I have already put in 90hrs into the game and can wait till the next time I think 10 has improved.
When ever I've done a few benchmarks,from running a few games benchmarks to apps that test ram and cpu,the difference is so small you couldn't feel it.
I've run a start up test that shows 7 to be quicker than 10 and,10 and 8,1 on par with each other.
Just had a week of installing 10 and now 8,1 and of the benchmarks I ran there was only a couple percentage points between them,all on my PC,the only difference are the drivers.
I can't run 7 now because the bios that support the new Ryzen cpu's don't seem to work but 8,1 and newer works.
The only downside of 8,1 is that I can't run Cyberpunk because CDPR hasn't heard of vulkan,fortunately I have already put in 90hrs into the game and can wait till the next time I think 10 has improved.