Bill Gates-backed fusion startup begins licensing for futuristic reactor in Tennessee

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,029   +59
Staff
Why it matters: The next chapter of the United States' fusion effort began quietly last month when Type One Energy, a startup backed by Bill Gates, submitted its first construction license application. The filing paves the way for the construction of a stellarator experimental reactor.

For six decades, the Bull Run Fossil Plant in Claxton, Tennessee, powered a region on fossil fuel. Last year, the plant was decommissioned, collapsing the plant's twin smokestacks in a controlled demolition. Their fall didn't just erase a landmark from the Tennessee skyline; it symbolized the state's newly emerging role in high-tech energy innovation. Popular Mechanics reports that the site may soon host the complex magnetic coils of Infinity One – a nuclear reactor designed to confine plasma at temperatures of up to 100 million degrees Celsius.

Type One Energy's design takes a sharp turn from the tokamak reactors more familiar to the fusion world and instead is modeled on a stellarator. Like a tokamak, a stellarator holds a toroidal plasma ring suspended by magnetic fields. However, rather than simple circular coils, stellarators twist their magnetic geometry into intricate paths. This approach promises far more stable confinement – solving a problem that has plagued tokamak experiments for decades – but it introduces much greater engineering complexity.

A key part of Type One's approach is the use of high-temperature superconducting magnets in those complex coils. The company is developing modular HTS magnet technology capable of carrying very high currents and producing multi-tesla magnetic fields in the contorted shapes that stellarators require. These coils operate at cryogenic temperatures, designed to pack strong fields into compact footprints, which is central to keeping the device's size and cost within practical limits. Testing programs are focused on proving that these non-planar HTS coils can withstand the mechanical stresses and field strengths demanded by a next-generation stellarator.

Type One's stellarator concept relies on quasi-symmetry optimization, a design strategy that sculpts the three-dimensional field so that particle orbits behave as though they were in a more symmetric configuration. To get there, the team uses large-scale plasma and magnetostatic simulations on high-performance computing systems, including exascale-class machines at national labs.

The company uses those simulations to refine coil shapes, reduce transport losses, and set the physics basis for the follow-on Infinity Two power plant while trimming risk before it builds the hardware. Infinity One is the prototype stage of a plan that will eventually include a 350-megawatt electric plant dubbed Infinity Two, along with a training center for the region's new fusion workforce.

Type One aims to get the prototype operational by 2029, an ambitious timeline by fusion standards. Infinity Two is laid out as a full pilot power plant, with architecture that accommodates divertors to exhaust helium "ash" and protect the walls, using breeding blankets that both shield the magnets and generate tritium for fuel.

Several of Type One's founders helped design major plasma facilities, including the Helically Symmetric Experiment at the University of Wisconsin--Madison and Germany's Wendelstein 7-X, the world's largest operating stellarator. Experiments on Wendelstein 7-X and other optimized stellarators have already shown improved confinement and reduced neoclassical transport compared with earlier designs, supporting the idea that optimized stellarators can approach tokamak-like performance while retaining their steady-state, disruption-resistant advantages.

Type One CEO Christofer Mowry called the collaboration with the Tennessee Valley Authority a model for "safety by design."

"We've been working closely together since February 2024, sharing relevant design information and knowledge that is essential to establish the appropriate licensing conditions for a fusion power plant," he said.

Mowry described the partnership as making Tennessee an international example of safety and transparency in the licensing of fusion machines.

Bull Run's transformation fits a broader pattern sweeping across US energy redevelopment. Form Energy has located its first iron-air battery manufacturing facility in the former steel-manufacturing town of Weirton, West Virginia. Meanwhile, developers in Lincoln, Maine, are turning a shuttered paper mill into the world's largest grid-scale battery installation.

Another Gates-backed company, TerraPower, is building an advanced fission plant near a retiring coal facility in Kemmerer, Wyoming. Non-nuclear construction of the facility began in June 2024. Instead of discarding the infrastructure of the carbon era, engineers are now reengineering it for the physics of a cleaner one.

Permalink to story:

 
As Gordon Gekko called those - Fusion-Delusion :)
We already have achieved fusion, it's just controlling it and harnessing the energy from it that's the problem. This is one of those inter-generational technologies that's hard accept now but will change that lives of either our children or our children's children. It was 20 years away 70 years ago. This is one of the beautiful things about humanity that I believe we don't appreciate or think about much. We make progress and technology that we might not see how it's utilized in our lifetimes or it's impact. I doubt the people who created the first computers thought we would have magic space rectangles in our pockets that we use to argue with strangers. IPV4 *only* has ~4.3 billion addresses because that was an absurdly large number of connected devices when it was derived.

Fusion will come, maybe not in our lifetimes, but I firmly believe that humanity can do it. In the mean time we have this amazing fusion reactor in the sky that gives use free energy every day so we can use that while we wait.
 
We already have achieved fusion, it's just controlling it and harnessing the energy from it that's the problem. This is one of those inter-generational technologies that's hard accept now but will change that lives of either our children or our children's children. It was 20 years away 70 years ago.
It was never 20 years away back then. That's just more myths. The magnetics have always been too weak. They were counting on stronger magnets all along but they didn't exist back then.

There is a chance now that HTS exist. The path forward is only now opening up.

PS: I'm glad to see stellarators are getting some love.
 
Last edited:
Gates has chosen wisely. Tokamaks are ludicrously complex, expensive and huge; stellarators are a far better bet, and now with AI helping with the enormous task of controlling the magnetic fields progress is being made more rapidly.
 
There is also a third configuration of magnetic confinement, called "levitated dipole", that I only recently discovered. It has very little money on it at the moment but looks capable of being cheap to both build and operate.

PS: I just had a nosy on Wikipedia about the how many types of magnetic confinement there are and they start off with the "magnetic mirror". It's a straight tube without a continuous path. Not the greatest idea.

So there is three:
- Tokamak, as a refined Z-pinch.
- Stellerator.
- Levitated dipole.

There is reference to a fourth "reversed field pinch" too but is not considered of value to electricity generation.
 
Yes, one of your favorite liberal boogeymen. So you have to be against this. Didn't the Orange Turd by some crappy fusion company for like $6 billion earlier this month to try and boost Truth Social's stock price? How did that go? hahahaha

Please go preach your politics somewhere else...this is supposed to be a tech website. There are plenty of other places to fight about this junk.
 
On the topic....How do you license something that doesn't exist? What would you need a license for?
 
He is only pointing out the preaching from RudyBob. You may want to criticise the original off-topic post instead.

Actually, no. I didn't miss it...I just did not presume that to mention Bill Gates was to make a commentary on his politics. Despite his success at Microsoft, he hardly has a sterling record with his tech ideas and pontificates. Anyone remember his biography being recalled to delete his statements about the internet amounting to nothing?
 
Last edited:
LOL, now who's preaching. We all have our beefs. Telling one to shut up for being off-topic while ignoring the other is hypocrisy.
 
It's great that so many startups are working on fusion or small fission reactors using different strategies.

I believe this particular startup will be grateful if you omit "Bill Gates backed" in their description 🤣🤣🤣
 
For humanity, the success or failure of fusion technology spells the difference between paradise and hell. While humanity has the potential for millions of years of survival, a lack of clean and abundant energy resources in the coming decades or centuries will lead to suffering from pollution and climate change. This will eventually result in a harsh environment, conflict and ultimately, extinction.
 
... a lack of clean and abundant energy resources in the coming decades or centuries will lead to suffering from pollution and climate change. This will eventually result in a harsh environment, conflict and ultimately, extinction.
Or we could be responsible and practice restraint.
 
On the topic....How do you license something that doesn't exist? What would you need a license for?
That is the difference between US patent office and good old days of British patent office where one had to show 2 working prototypes to get a patent.

... and then there are Ausies where you could get patent for ... a wheel.
 
Or we could be responsible and practice restraint.
Bill Gates could be responsible and practice restraint. Private jets, maintenance of many properties, swimming pools.... Billionaires use a disproportionate amount of resources. I remember an arab prince, who had everyday the content of a large table of food thrown away so that he could pick the single food he wanted to eat.
 
I wasn't talking about individuals. I was talking about setting rules. Rules that should have been put in place 40+ years ago. A good opportunity was during the oil crisis in the 1970's. The greenhouse effect from human activities was already a known back then.
 
Last edited:
Yes, one of your favorite liberal boogeymen. So you have to be against this. Didn't the Orange Turd by some crappy fusion company for like $6 billion earlier this month to try and boost Truth Social's stock price? How did that go? hahahaha
What are you talking about?
 
Back