I liked XP and I was running an IT business supporting people with it. Ity was more work to install then modern image-based installs like Windows 10. The other bad thing about XP was that it easy to corrupt. Programs in XP were easily corrupted in memory so the bad guys were having a field day with it. It's sad to say that XP was the swiss cheese of operating systems.
Microsoft had no choice but to completely rethink a new direction and Vista was born. The rollout of that one was such a disaster. It required a powerful machine to run and the new security model prevented all kinds of software from working (like graphics cards and printers). I was recommending people keep the XP going at that time.
It wasn't until Vista was re-written properly and re-released as Windows 7 that we get a better OS than XP. By the time Windows 8/8.1 tried and failed to replace Windows 7 that Microsoft worked their magic and came out with Windows 10 which has been pretty good. I don't think we need a version 11 but it's here anyways.
I liked XP and I was running an IT business supporting people with it. Ity was more work to install then modern image-based installs like Windows 10. The other bad thing about XP was that it easy to corrupt. Programs in XP were easily corrupted in memory so the bad guys were having a field day with it. It's sad to say that XP was the swiss cheese of operating systems.
Microsoft had no choice but to completely rethink a new direction and Vista was born. The rollout of that one was such a disaster. It required a powerful machine to run and the new security model prevented all kinds of software from working (like graphics cards and printers). I was recommending people keep the XP going at that time.
It wasn't until Vista was re-written properly and re-released as Windows 7 that we get a better OS than XP. By the time Windows 8/8.1 tried and failed to replace Windows 7 that Microsoft worked their magic and came out with Windows 10 which has been pretty good. I don't think we need a version 11 but it's here anyways.
not sure where you were working but anyone who says that windows 10 is either easier to install or support than xp was not and is not now working where I was working or am working now. as I stated before, xp could be fixed by doing a repair install if it got corrupt and did not thrash itself to death updating etc. REGARDSI liked XP and I was running an IT business supporting people with it. Ity was more work to install then modern image-based installs like Windows 10. The other bad thing about XP was that it easy to corrupt. Programs in XP were easily corrupted in memory so the bad guys were having a field day with it. It's sad to say that XP was the swiss cheese of operating systems.
Microsoft had no choice but to completely rethink a new direction and Vista was born. The rollout of that one was such a disaster. It required a powerful machine to run and the new security model prevented all kinds of software from working (like graphics cards and printers). I was recommending people keep the XP going at that time.
It wasn't until Vista was re-written properly and re-released as Windows 7 that we get a better OS than XP. By the time Windows 8/8.1 tried and failed to replace Windows 7 that Microsoft worked their magic and came out with Windows 10 which has been pretty good. I don't think we need a version 11 but it's here anyways.
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
well xp had a recovery console also but it rarely had to be used. no need to copy files and then re-install etc. which takes TIME !!. thats the difference if I billed customers all the time I have spent fixing w10 they would all be using macs !! who would pay 500 for a computer and then 1000 to fix it ?One thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
no it does not have a repair install where it re-installs os fies like xp did. in fact none of m& releases after xp had it. reset this pc is data destructive. you end up with a windows.old foler which has all the files in it but still have to re-install any software. after you give up on it and re-install w10. takes a lot of time.the only other os that m$ made that had it was server 2003. what you did was tell it to install windows and then when it came up with the list of what it found on the hd you pressed R to do a repair install. w10 does not have this nor do any of the others. as for reset your pc. I have never seen the non-destructive reset work and I dont think it does the same thing.I disagree, windows 10 does have a repair function you can do without losing files just like a repair of wxp, what they called a dirty install. Also, I was a technician for Dell Technical support during the heyday of wxp, and I had many customers who lost files because the os was so corrupt it could not be repaired. One of the main reasons for this was the plethora of viruses and malware written for xp because it was king for the longest period of time and they still exist. I don't know of w10 system restore taking longer than xp. I go by the philosophy of if it ain't broke don't fix it but I'll wait for the jury to come in on w11, meanwhile it's like Bass2004 says, it's time to move on.
I have customers who are using point of sale apps that are still running xp. I have had to clone and replace hd and finally to ssd. there are several reasons that xp still works well not the least of which is the text-only printer driver that m$ changed after xp. on the 40 column receipt printer, the new drivers (after xp) simply dont work. the security isnt an issue since the cash register computers and file server are not (and will not be) connected to the internet.You can still use XP so I'm not sure what the fuss is all about. If you are not bothered about security it works great. For those finding Windows updates a pain then it's what you are looking for - there aren't any. My ancient Medion 8383 is very fast and if I put an SSD drive in (which is unlikely to happen) it would do even better.
Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC is selling off its unsoldOne thing that I find that makes W10 superior I think is in the recovery console where you can boot directly to the command prompt and transfer files to an external storage like a flash drive and save the files before you reinstall or repair the os. If the os was beyond repairing in xp you couldn't do that. You could boot into safe mode with command prompt in xp however, if the os was not to corrupt,
Neither Pentium III or Pentium 4 was ever a dual core processor. There are dual core Pentiums and Celerons. But P3 and P4 was before dual core productions.The HP I mentioned has a Pentium III processor, 2 core.
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.00GHz. The Windows XP scanned itself and thought it was Pentium III. Device Manager shows itNeither Pentium III or Pentium 4 was ever a dual core processor. There are dual core Pentiums and Celerons. But P3 and P4 was before dual core productions.
Chrome Browser does not work because it has an error message," P3 and P4 was before dual core production" is true. My P4 3.4Ghz Medion was single core but can also function as a fan heater in case our gas boiler stops working. It was billed as having hyper threading technology. I don't know what that is but the performance was pretty amazing for its time. A dual core replaced it but is now scrapped. That desktop went from Vista to W7 to W10 but was looking very tired when I junked it.
No way is an XP system suitable for a beginner. There are too many security vulnerabilities and regular invites (nags) to update browsers and software soon lead to things not working.
While I would not call XP the "Best" version of Windows(IMHO that would be Windows 7), it's certainly one of the greatest. Just so you know, Windows & has the "Repair Install" option as well. Not sure if it was present with Windows 8/8.1 as I actively avoided them.Xp was the best and last os that m$ released for several reasons not the least of which is the ability to do a repair install.
FWIW, Windows 7 can no longer be activated with the code supplied on the package either.. I had to go through the telephone ordeal with a fresh copy of Win 7 32 bit Pro the other nightThe Windows XP website that we need to activate our OS does not seem to be there, but the telephone with that automated digital voice asking for several series of numbers shows to be what they want.
If that does not work, a google search shows that not much is a problem if the Windows XP cannot be activated in 30 days.
The only conceivable reason for needing that is if you're dumb enough to leave data files on C:/ to begin with.Not encouraging that a tech forum has so many backward looking posts. Things are what they are. W11 has made much functioning hardware effectively obsolete. XP, while I love it, has no place in mainstream discussions and W11 should be the main focus. There's a current thread about which was the best Windows OS.
This would be nice. Mental midget needs to go.I really wish the fed would revoke this a**hole Nadella's H1-B Visa
That won't happen. Bill is done with MS.and bring Bill Gates back.
News flash, XP won't let you use the DVD repair function, if the edition of Windows installed is on a different service pack number from the disc..no it does not have a repair install where it re-installs os fies like xp did