Broadcom's VMware shake-up triggers EU antitrust complaint by cloud providers

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,030   +59
Staff
What just happened? Broadcom's overhaul of VMware's cloud partner ecosystem has escalated into a formal antitrust battle in Europe. The trade group CISPE, representing cloud service providers across the continent, filed a complaint with the European Commission, accusing Broadcom of abusing its market power by dismantling VMware's longstanding Cloud Service Provider (CSP) program.

CISPE claims Broadcom's actions have excluded most European cloud infrastructure partners, sharply reduced competition, and forced smaller firms out of the VMware ecosystem altogether.

The group's move follows months of changes since Broadcom finalized its acquisition of VMware and began restructuring the company's licensing and partner tiers. The complaint asks regulators to intervene before the CSP program's remaining agreements expire on March 31, calling for the Commission to impose an interim order reopening the program and reinstating displaced partners. CISPE also urged explicit protections against potential retaliation from Broadcom.

CISPE's secretary general, Francisco Mingorance, described Broadcom's behavior as "outrageous and unjustified," citing steep price hikes and restrictive contract terms that he argued amount to "a coup de grâce" for many smaller service providers.

The dispute centers on Broadcom's decision to shutter VMware's open CSP partner framework and replace it with an invitation-only program tailored for large enterprise-facing resellers. While VMware had worked with more than 4,000 CSP partners before the acquisition, that number has fallen to just 19 in the United States and 9 in the United Kingdom.

Eligibility requirements have also shifted. Under Broadcom's new rules, CSPs must operate at least 3,500 cores to qualify for partnership – a threshold that effectively disqualifies a large share of regional providers. In January, the company confirmed the termination of the existing European CSP program, a decision that triggered CISPE's formal complaint.

CISPE, which represents about 50 members, including smaller regional firms and major players such as AWS and Microsoft in non-voting roles, argues that Broadcom's new model harms fair competition. The trade group's filing accuses the company of "ongoing abuse," including product bundling and mandatory commitments based on projected, not actual, usage.

Broadcom disputes the allegations. In a statement responding to the complaint, the company said it "strongly disagrees" with the allegations by CISPE, described it as "an organization funded by hyperscalers, which misrepresents the realities of the market," and framed its VMware partners as offering alternatives to hyperscalers.

Broadcom emphasized that it remains committed to "investing significantly" in its European partner network, asserting that its new program better equips local providers to compete with large cloud platforms and serve enterprise customers.

The complaint adds a fresh layer to Broadcom's ongoing legal challenges in Europe. Last July, CISPE separately appealed to the EU General Court to overturn the Commission's original approval of the VMware acquisition – a case that remains pending.

Permalink to story:

 
If Europe had any metal it would ban Broadcom from operating in its territory. Enshitification of everything continues.
 
This reminds me of the guy who bought the EpiPen. Find a mature market that has a semi monopoly with a large user base that is happy with the product. Buy said company at whatever the cost, and then gouge the customers by increasing the prices by huge, unreasonable multiples since your the only place to go and the trapped users have no options.

The problem with monopoly laws is that they are designed to prevent monopolies from happening. They don't apply to any existing functional monopoly being purchased and THEN abused to the extreme.
 
Europe is dismantling itself and the pace is speeding up. I think the USA should quit protecting them
 
Europe is dismantling itself and the pace is speeding up. I think the USA should quit protecting them
Off topic, but I will address it anyway, many many of us Brits, while no longer in the EU are still European (not all, admittedly, our political leaders make a career out of bowing down to their masters in DC) would gladly see the 10k+ US military personnel based here in the UK shipped home, along with the spying infrastructure and an end to using our military and our bases to wage illegal wars of aggression.

On topic, have you any thoughts on Broadcoms ownership of Vmware and the way it conducts business?
 
The only thing the US protects is its own interests....which is mostly oil at present.
It's always about oil with the US. There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but there was plenty of oil. It's also quite telling that the first country that was attacked was Venezuela who has the largest oil reserves in the world. Then the second country they attacked was Iran which has the third largest reserves in the world. The second largest is Saudi Arabia, which is of course off limits since they buy tons of US made weapons and sell them cheap oil. That brings me to the 4th largest oil reserves, which is in my own country of Canada. Should I be scared we're next?
 
On topic, have you any thoughts on Broadcoms ownership of Vmware and the way it conducts business?
None. There are essentially NO business's that are honest. And since business's are made of people that means people are dishonest too. Even the church board that I am a member of voted to put our new furnace in a members name to get a longer warranty. That option was suggested by the seller/installer so they were dishonest too. I voted against the move but I am not an honest Joe either. The EU is as crooked as they come
 
None. There are essentially NO business's that are honest. And since business's are made of people that means people are dishonest too. Even the church board that I am a member of voted to put our new furnace in a members name to get a longer warranty. That option was suggested by the seller/installer so they were dishonest too. I voted against the move but I am not an honest Joe either. The EU is as crooked as they come
Sounds like fraud, I hope you reported them to the authorities?
 
Back