California bans addictive social media features for children under 16 and tightens AI chatbot rules

midian182

Posts: 11,902   +182
Staff member
What just happened? California is tightening the rules on how tech companies keep children glued to their screens. Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a package of laws targeting addictive social media features and potentially harmful AI companions, with large platforms facing penalties of up to $1 million per child for negligently causing harm.

Newsom's office describes the chatbot and social media protections as the strongest in the country, including the nation's first requirements for independent child safety audits and annual risk assessments for companion chatbots.

The measures, which were signed on September 10, include AB 1709, which prohibits social media companies from offering addictive features to users under 16. That covers autoplay and algorithmic feeds built around a user's history and profile.

"Innovation comes with responsibility and protecting our children comes first," Newsom said.

The chatbot centerpiece is SB 1119, also known as Adam's Law. Named after teenager Adam Raine, whose parents sued OpenAI over claims ChatGPT encouraged his suicide in 2025, it requires risk assessments before new or substantially modified companion chatbots are released, alongside independent compliance audits.

According to the bill's authors, operators must use age-bracket signals supplied through operating systems. Default protections include usage limits, disabled notifications, and restrictions on persistent conversational memory, with changes reserved for parents.

Companies also face liability if they fail to take reasonable measures against harmful outputs, including sexual content, romantic roleplay, and emotional manipulation that encourages children to withdraw from friends and family. Crisis support and parental notification requirements address credible threats of imminent self-harm.

Families harmed by violations of specified protections can seek legal action. Operators must also implement incident reporting, while independent audit findings will be submitted to the California Attorney General.

"We cannot make the same mistakes that were made with social media," said Senator Steve Padilla.

Last year, 44 attorneys general warned AI companies they would be held accountable for harm to children. That followed revelations about Meta's internal chatbot guidelines permitting romantic exchanges with minors. Meta said the offending sections had been removed and were inconsistent with its policies.

Unsurprisingly, Meta isn't happy about the new feed restrictions. The company argues that personalization helps it provide teenagers with relevant, age-appropriate content, according to the Associated Press.

"Personalization is also how we deliver age-appropriate content for teens that is relevant to them – all with the proper guardrails in place," spokesperson Jim Cullinan said.

The package also restricts targeted advertising to children and the use of school pupil data in AI systems. Families will be able to opt out of school-issued laptops, too.

The signing follows two AI oversight laws approved on September 9. SB 813 establishes a framework for independent organizations to assess AI systems' compliance with state law, while AB 1405 creates a registry of AI auditors and standards for their independence.

Permalink to story:

 
Thank goodness for California and Europe trying to curve children's screen addiction since it seems like parents nowadays don't care enough for their kids' mental health to implement that themselves.
The other side of that is we all have to deal with things like internet ID laws because people won't keep an eye on what there kids are doing.
 
Thank You, Thank You, Thank You.
I already see the difference now that cellphones have been stripped from these kids during school.
 
The other side of that is we all have to deal with things like internet ID laws because people won't keep an eye on what there kids are doing.
I have never had to deal with this. I live in California.

There is no downside to this, unless your a kid.
 
I have never had to deal with this. I live in California.

There is no downside to this, unless your a kid.
It varies by State. It's actually conservative states that are the worse. I'm currently in Florida and I had trouble find some stuff because I didn't know it was considered adult content. I was getting some really weird search results that had nothing to do with what I was looking for a meme and found out it was technically covered under their pornography ban.

Going a little bit deeper into the rabbit hole I found out that there are websites that simply choose to block IP addresses from those states rather than comply with ID laws. This started a wave of people using VPNs and now states and countries(most of the EU) are trying to ban VPNs.

I'm just watching this both laughing and kind of in horror because the governments are saying "comply with this or you can't do business here" and the businesses are saying "fine, we're choosing not do business with you". VPN use increases because of a problem the government created and then the government tries to ban those. It's a game of wack a mole where more honest people get impacted than not.

The Internet is very different depending on where you are and that's scary. Something else that's terrifying is that the Internet in far left and far right states are very similar in the level of sensorship
 
Thank goodness for California and Europe trying to curve children's screen addiction since it seems like parents nowadays don't care enough for their kids' mental health to implement that themselves.
When people decide to have a child, they need to consider if they capable to properly raise one, because right now the parents of nowadays depend 100% of new laws to do their own parental responsibilities.
 
It varies by State. It's actually conservative states that are the worse. I'm currently in Florida and I had trouble find some stuff because I didn't know it was considered adult content. I was getting some really weird search results that had nothing to do with what I was looking for a meme and found out it was technically covered under their pornography ban.

Going a little bit deeper into the rabbit hole I found out that there are websites that simply choose to block IP addresses from those states rather than comply with ID laws. This started a wave of people using VPNs and now states and countries(most of the EU) are trying to ban VPNs.

I'm just watching this both laughing and kind of in horror because the governments are saying "comply with this or you can't do business here" and the businesses are saying "fine, we're choosing not do business with you". VPN use increases because of a problem the government created and then the government tries to ban those. It's a game of wack a mole where more honest people get impacted than not.

The Internet is very different depending on where you are and that's scary. Something else that's terrifying is that the Internet in far left and far right states are very similar in the level of sensorship
Right wing American government doing things no one likes is an everyday occurrence in 2026. No surprise there.
 
Right wing American government doing things no one likes is an everyday occurrence in 2026. No surprise there.
Quit acting like the left is innocent. They're both passing the same types of bills and branding it differently to their individual populations. In Florida it's branded as "preserving conservative Christian values so we can live free" but in left aligned states the same things are being branded as "for protecting the children."

They're passing the same bills and the only difference is the marketing yet no one seems to see it happening. Everyone is arguing about which color crayon tastes the best to notice that they taste exactly the same
 
I have never had to deal with this. I live in California.

There is no downside to this, unless your a kid.
California is in the process of mandating age ID laws. There is a major downside to all this, in that it mandates Intrusive data collection to ensure you are who you say you are. Anything that attacks anonymity is a major problem.
 
Back