Dell prices 28-inch 4K Ultra HD monitor at just $699

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,294   +192
Staff member

Last month Dell introduced new 32- and 24-inch 4K Ultra HD monitors but what really got us excited was the promise of a 28-incher in the sub $1,000 range early this year. True to its word, the company has introduced said monitor at the Consumer Electronics Show at the ultra aggressive price of just $699.

It’s known as the P2815Q and it contains an IPS LED display boasting a full 4K resolution of 3,840 x 2,160 that promises the same “screen performance” as the two UltraSharp 4K models announced last month (those start at $1,400, mind you). The 28-inch screen will be height-adjustable and users can even rotate it to portrait view if they so choose.

dell joking monitor ultrasharp

Dell has yet to announce full specifications on the monitor so things like refresh rate and input options are unknown at this hour. A poor refresh rate could limit the usefulness of the P2815Q in gaming, but let’s not jump ahead of ourselves. It’s probably a safe bet that we’ll see DisplayPort as one input option, however.

We’re still in the very early stages of 4K technology both in terms of software and hardware but there are still several non-entertainment uses for such monitors. For example, they’d serve as an excellent replacement for a traditional multi-monitor display thanks to the added screen real estate. And if you do have the graphics processing power, gaming would look out of this world at max resolution.

The Dell P2815Q will go on sale starting January 23 and be sure to check back for our review of the 32-inch Dell UltraSharp in the near future.

Permalink to story.

 
Looks like I'm skipping 2560x1440, then. This monitor is more reasonably priced than some of the 1440p monitors I've been looking at.
 
Video Card would need to be able to take advantage of this monitor. Still if 4K coming down that usually means 8K is on it's way in. But all these monitors will be replaced by the new Translucent LCD TS Monitor. Now where talking..
 
OK, I'll be that guy.

"boasting a full 4K resolution of 3,840 x 2,160"

This is incorrect. 4K is 4,096 pixels wide. 3,840 x 2,160 is UHD.
 
Guess I know what to tell my job I need. Hard for me to explain why I'd need a Catleap, but this I can make a business case for.
 
OK, I'll be that guy.

"boasting a full 4K resolution of 3,840 x 2,160"

This is incorrect. 4K is 4,096 pixels wide. 3,840 x 2,160 is UHD.
Like it wasn't confusing enough, according to Wikipedia these are the "Standardized Resolutions":
4K Ultra high definition television 3840 x 2160 1.78:1 (16:9)
4K Ultra wide television 5120 x 2160 2.37:1 (21:9)
4K WHXGA 5120 x 3200 1.60:1 (16:10)
Digital Cinema Initiatives 4K (native resolution) 4096 x 2160 1.90:1 (256:135) ~17:9
DCI 4K (CinemaScope cropped) 4096 x 1716 2.39:1
DCI 4K (flat cropped) 3996 x 2160 1.85:1
 
IM interested in this because of the price, however I want to see the total system specs before I jump the gun. But I like the price of this for sure!
 
I too have read in a couple places that it will be a TN panel and not IPS. I've also read that it will have a 30hz refresh rate at the UHD resolution, and 60hz at FHD... I was kind of excited by the monitor, but not nearly as much now that I've read around some more. =(
 
Awesome stuff. This would go great with next gen GPUs and games, which are going to be geared towards 4K.
 
I wouldn't believe this, because it definitely will have a DisplayPort 1.2, which can handle 4K at 60Hz.
Right, but it might be clocked to match HDMI standards, and if that standard is HDMI 1.4, that is good only up to 30Hz, and that's what I've read.

However if they have different refresh rates depending on the port, then all is not lost.
 
Specs in the article are wrong. This monitor is a TN panel + 30 Hz refresh rate. Garbage for games. Wouldn't pay $199 for this monitor.
 
Guest said:
30hz. Useless.
Even more useless is the fact most applications are not optimized (I'm looking at you, Chrome) for this Ultra HD monitor.
 
I see that all the early adopters have Died - first release, affordable and it's Not perfect? shudder..
wish I could remember a notable comment RE 1080p and/or LCD replacing CRTs.. thankfully those poorly performing platforms all evaporated for lack of interest..

/sarcasm
 
Looks like 4K WHXGA 5120 x 3200 1.60:1 (16:10), covers all the others if you don't mind the black lines above and below the picture, which I don't. 30 Hz? What a waste to even make such a monitor.
 
@Guest who said this isnt true 4k . 4K at 16:9 is 3840 x 2160, 4K at 17:9 is 4096 x 2160
 
Back