Donald Trump says fictional F-52 jets found only in Call of Duty have been sold to Norway

[wiyosaya]

I may not be his biggest fan, but he was, and still is, a better choice than Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton has broken laws, threatened Russia, someone who could beat us in war, and left Americans to die in Benghazi. So far, Trump has just been an I d I o t.

Yes, she has broken so many laws that Republicans have failed to find any chargeable evidence against her even though they have wasted millions and millions of taxpayer dollars on several different investigations of her and while they pretend to do real work. Wow, she must be a criminal just like Trump says! Lock her up!!!

Then again, I agree that Trump has been nothing but an I d I o t since day one in office and before. And he continues on a daily basis to prove to the world that he is nothing but an I d I o t.

Gee, I wonder what that makes his claims of Hillary Clinton being a criminal????

 

[wiyosaya]

This had NOTHING to do with Call of Duty.... he said F-52 by accident... there happens to be F-52s in the video game.... I suspect there are plenty of other things that have F-52 in them (heck, could be a coordinate in an advanced game of Battleship).

To draw the conclusion that Trump was playing COD is just inane. This article has absolutely NOTHING to do with tech.... saying that, there are more comments on it than almost any other "tech news" piece on this site this week - so articles like this are apparently going to stay...

Thanks for informing me of reality. Phew! That was tough! I must have lost my grip on it!

 

[wiyosaya]

It looks like Trump said we sold f***ng 52 F-35 to Norvey. But after TV censoring all heard F 52 only.

Just like the media posting FAKE NEWS!

 

[wiyosaya]

When the only thing your critics have to cry about is spelling transposition or other minor gaffes, you know you're doing your job right. When all you have to do is put out a silly tweet to distract your psychotic, fascist opponents so you can actually DO your job, that's genius.

I think you are misinterpreting the reaction...the reality is that we are all laughing and then facepalming - not another I d I o t I c comment from the Infant in Chief!

 

[wiyosaya]

The smartest and finest President in the last 100 years

Considering a career in comedy?

 

[cliffordcooley]

Trump is the center of focus from millions. He is not acting any more *****ic than the millions throwing stones at him. I call that irony on a national scale. I think Trump sees it that way as well or else he wouldn't be acting that way. Call him what you will, but he didn't gain his fortune by stupidity.

 

[wiyosaya]

Keep up the good work, Rob!

 

[EClyde]

Considering a career in comedy?

There are many things I might write but they would not benefit you

 

[wiyosaya]

Trump is the center of focus from millions. He is not acting any more *****ic than the millions throwing stones at him. I call that irony on a national scale. I think Trump sees it that way as well or else he wouldn't be acting that way. Call him what you will, but he didn't gain his fortune by stupidity.

I think that what you call throwing stones is people waking up to the fact that he could care less about those who elected him.

I would actually consider him more successful if he had gained his fortune by stupidity than by f'ing over as many people as he could. However, it is your choice to infer intelligence in his wealth that has been gained by f'ing over as many people as he could.

 

[cliffordcooley]

I would actually consider him more successful if he had gained his fortune by stupidity than by f'ing over as many people as he could. However, it is your choice to infer intelligence in his wealth that has been gained by f'ing over as many people as he could.

Oh I agree with you there, however that is no different than any other politician. That is an anger I have toward all of them. It's a shared anger so I know it does no good to only look at one person.

 

[Joe Blow]

Just because you're a "tech news" site, it doesn't mean you have to be a bunch of Leftist morons. So now Trump just had a Nancy Pelosi moment. Care to comment on Nancy Pelosi?

 

[wiyosaya]

Oh I agree with you there, however that is no different than any other politician. That is an anger I have toward all of them. It's a shared anger so I know it does no good to only look at one person.

We are on the same page, then. Personally, I think the process of government in this country is a joke at this time - no matter the party. Many politicians have no clue what their constituents want. Some might have a clue but could care less, at least as I see it, and without regard to political party. It seems that at this time, government is more of a we will tell you what is best for you type of rule which is authoritarianism rather than democracy. As I see it, the past 10 or more years has been spent on frivolous legislation that looks like something is getting done when, in reality, nothing really is. As I see it, infrastructure is one of the bigger needs of this country right now, but hardly anything has been done about it.

Unfortunately, voting, for me, has become a choice between what I see as the lesser of two evils.

 

[wiyosaya]

Just because you're a "tech news" site, it doesn't mean you have to be a bunch of Leftist morons. So now Trump just had a Nancy Pelosi moment. Care to comment on Nancy Pelosi?

Play bully, by all means. If Nancy Pelosi were making an a s s of herself every single day, I would be all over her. Just like I said that I would have doubted Obama if he was consistently unable to find the back door to the white house.

The amount of Pelosi's f-ups seems trivial by comparison to Trump's - at least as I see it. Deflection has never been a good means to solve problems because, as I see it, it refuses to take responsibility for one's own part in the mess. If its not how dastardly Hillary Clinton is, which if she is so dastardly, then why have Republicans after spending millions of taxpayer dollars on multiple investigations of her and not found anything lawfully chargeable, then it is your other favorite democrat to hate. To me, deflection is getting really old, and it is rather trivial to poke full of holes.

I guess not only is Hillary Clinton dastardly, but she must be a witch, too, that has cast a spell over Republicans and turned them into voodoo dolls so that they are all blindly overlooking incriminating evidence against her. Yes, that must be it!

If you want to call me a leftist m o r o n for pointing out the fact that Republicans have found nothing chargeable against Hillary Clinton, have fun. I simply see it as yet another deflection.

 

[captaincranky]

....[ ]...Unfortunately, voting, for me, has become a choice between what I see as the lesser of two evils.

You really do consider yourself very special, don't you?

Voting by everybody, is, and has been, the choice of, "the lesser of two evils", for many decades.

Back in the 1950's, we elected Dwight D. Eisenhower president happily, and unquestioningly, without the absurd and continually evolving firestorms of controversy. IIRC,and IMHO, the quality of government and elected leaders, has been going downhill ever since.

And no, I don't want to hear about JFK's rather brief and very tragic interim.

 

[captaincranky]

Play bully, by all means. If Nancy Pelosi were making an a s s of herself every single day, I would be all over her. Just like I said that I would have doubted Obama if he was consistently unable to find the back door to the white house....[ ].....

Are you suggesting the President Obama should have been required to use the "servant's entrance"?

OK, I'm truly just joking about that.

But, I can turn anything into an argument, it's my "gift".

 

[wiyosaya]

You really do consider yourself very special, don't you?

Of course!

Then again, I get the distinct impression that some people actually think that their vote gets them what they want! And to that, I keep wondering, how foolish can such people be?

Are you suggesting the President Obama should have been required to use the "servant's entrance"?

OK, I'm truly just joking about that.

But, I can turn anything into an argument, it's my "gift".

Well, I thought he was always using the servants entrance since, in theory anyway, he was a public servant. Then again, are not all politicians supposed to be public servants?

Never mind me, I often type while I am sleeping - then wake up to the reality of the situation!

And of course, I have not forgotten the pleasantries we have exchanged from time-to-time!

 

[Kashim]

How dare you post something negative about the Dear Leader! Only praise and adoration allowed, kthxbye.

 

[captaincranky]

How dare you post something negative about the Dear Leader! Only praise and adoration allowed, kthxbye.

Another web-bot heard from...

 

[Charles Olson]

but I feel like it's better to actually call him out on the stupid stuff he does, .

That could be a full time job for a few Americans !

 

[captaincranky]

That could be a full time job for most Americans !

Fixed!

 

[BAGilbert]

And this is worthy of an article on TechSpot? What a waste of electrons and the readers time.

Waste of time maybe. But electrons? that is not how they work.

I'm sure Barack Hussein Obama would say that such presidential gaffes are embarrassing to all "sixty(60) states" of the US... Well, maybe not. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNor1ZZQGz8)

Why include his middle name here? It makes you sound bigoted which I'm sure wasn't your intention...

Using someone's full name makes you sound like a bigot? wtfff??? talk about reaching for one...damn

Racist nut-job conspiracy theorists who claimed Barak Obama wasn't a legitimate US president always stressed his middle name, Hussein, like they were trying to argue he was Saddam Hussein's 3rd distant cousin or something. So yes, unless you clarify, spelling out his full name like that does group you in with those racist ****wits. You can just say Barak Obama, we'd know who you were talking about.

 

[holdum323]

Are you suggesting the President Obama should have been required to use the "servant's entrance"?

OK, I'm truly just joking about that.

But, I can turn anything into an argument, it's my "gift".

Yes you can, @captaincranky but I have seen some of your replies to 'Ask a Question" Your replies are quite good. I like that side of you. I guess any thing goes in these threads. I like the positive side of you cranky, but I also find the other side funny at times. I don't care for the the real nasty side you some times post, but I guess that's your thing. You have survived being on TS a long time. I just about didn't make it, but all is good now. I'm a survivor!

 

[cliffordcooley]

like they were trying to argue he was Saddam Hussein's 3rd distant cousin or something.

It might have helped, if he didn't play the part.

 

[holdum323]

If Obama had done just one of the things Trump has done, they would have impeached him. That's a fact. If anyone besides Hilary had run, Trump would now have his own TV network making a ton of money. That was his plan from day one. No one was more surprised then Donald when he won. We can only hope that that he doesn't completely destroy our country in 4 years. It's not looking good! I usually don't reply to these kind of threads, but it was kind a fun. I prefer the threads where members are asking for help with PC problems.

 

[captaincranky]

If Obama had done just one of the things Trump has done, they would have impeached him.

That's just simply not true. At the heart of any talk of 'impeachment", is a longstanding and extremely bitter feud between the elephants and the donkeys, is the successful, (and justified), impeachment of Richard Nixon by the Dems, balanced by the failed attempt at impeaching "Slick Willy", by the Republicans. Fact is, had the impeachment of Clinton been a success, the political landscape might be quite different. Perhaps just a zero sum, "let's start over now that we're even", level playing field.

Taken as a candidate on her own "merit", Hillary was/is, simply an annoying, carping, b!tch, who really had nothing going for her other than (besides walking 6 paces behind her husband like your typical Japanese concubine), "how about if I pretend I'm black", and I give the black community everything it has ever wanted in the way of social entitlements along with free college, and what the hell, free money too. "Vote for me , I'll set you free". Hey Hillary, that's already been done to death

Now they're trying to draft "Orca Winfrey", as a potential presidential. Her only "qualifications" are the fact that's she's the first, and possibly the most annoying, pushy, "professional black woman", to ever pollute daytime TV. Why people came on that show to the simple, transparent, and shameless end, of blowing sunshine up her fat a**, I'l never comprehend.

That's a fact. If anyone besides Hilary had run, Trump would now have his own TV network making a ton of money. That was his plan from day one. No one was more surprised then Donald when he won. We can only hope that that he doesn't completely destroy our country in 4 years. It's not looking good! I usually don't reply to these kind of threads, but it was kind a fun. I prefer the threads where members are asking for help with PC problems.

Never mind all the fatalism, and doom speak. All people have to do at the midterm is vote for the opposition, and not their conscience, to restore the balance of power between the legislature and the presidency.

I have this fantasy where "The Donald", drops a 50 or 100 megaton nuclear warhead, right smack in the middle of practicing sociopath Kim Jon-un's military parades.After which, Trump submits to removal from office voluntarily, with congress claiming "mental health issues". Trump then commissions his presidential library on the grounds of the ultra luxurious mental health facility he has built, (with a golf course), where he "takes his medicine like a good boy", and screws Miss America Pageant contestants, until his heart finally gives out. And we all, (Trump included), live happily ever after.