Elon Musk reveals his plans for Twitter

Status
Not open for further replies.
The NYP along with several others including the FBI had Hunters hard drive. If that isn't proof then I don't know what is.
And still no charges. Investigations don't always lead to a charge. Though, it looks like Kushner is in deep poo already. 5 years on Biden and no credible evidence and certainly no charges. Another Benghazi style ghost hunt.
 
And still no charges. Investigations don't always lead to a charge. Though, it looks like Kushner is in deep poo already. 5 years on Biden and no credible evidence and certainly no charges. Another Benghazi style ghost hunt.
The fact of the matter is the NYP was banned by Twitter for the crime of posting factual news that put the Bidens in a bad light.
 
The NYP along with several others including the FBI had Hunters hard drive. If that isn't proof then I don't know what is.
Having a hard-drive is not the same thing as having definitive proof. There is no proof, so far, that there was any incriminating evidence on that hard-drive. If the FBI says they found evidence on the hard-drive at some point in the future, then yes, that is proof, but until then, its yet another right-wing conspiracy theory not founded in fact.
 
Having a hard-drive is not the same thing as having definitive proof. There is no proof, so far, that there was any incriminating evidence on that hard-drive. If the FBI says they found evidence on the hard-drive at some point in the future, then yes, that is proof, but until then, its yet another right-wing conspiracy theory not founded in fact.
Obviously you didn't read the NYP article. Twitter banned the NYP for posting facts.
 
If the FBI says they found evidence on the hard-drive at some point in the future, then yes, that is proof, but until then, its yet another right-wing conspiracy theory not founded in fact.
And 5 years on. Nothing. But that doesn't matter, and isn't it ironic none of them want to discuss Kushner? Not a word. Even when asked.
Twitter banned the NYP for posting facts.
If you mean they got the date right, then I agree.

If I posted the sky is blue, no problem. If I then tell everyone they are in danger because razor blades are falling from the sky, the whole post would get pulled.
And the NYP pushed and pushed until Twits couldn't take it anymore.
Did you actually see some things the Post wrote? It made the trump right seem downright tolerable. That was bad stuff man. And it goes back further than some may know. Remember what the Post reported about the Boston bomber?
 
Last edited:
And 5 years on. Nothing. But that doesn't matter, and isn't it ironic none of them want to discuss Kushner? Not a word. Even when asked.

If you mean they got the date right, then I agree.

If I posted the sky is blue, no problem. If I then tell everyone they are in danger because razor blades are falling from the sky, the whole post would get pulled.
And the NYP pushed and pushed until Twits couldn't take it anymore.
Did you actually see some things the Post wrote? It made the trump right seem downright tolerable. That was bad stuff man. And it goes back further than some may know. Remember what the Post reported about the Boston bomber?
 
If Twitter isn’t a news source then why do they censor news? Why did they block the New York post for sharing what turned out to be a true story about Hunter Bidens laptop?

FYI, you don’t need to be “approved” or licenced etc to be a news source in America. (Well unless you’re in Canada).
I have no idea about the specifics of what you're referring to, but if they blocked an article about hunter's laptop it's mostly likely because that who story is completely made up, and only die hard Trump lovers believe it.

Trump literally got rid of thousands of white house documents and was even known to literally eat documents in from of people. The laptop BS is just a fantasy to distract people who watch fox news.

 
Whether we like it or not, the only real bearing that 'free speech' has on anyone's life is as a legal construct.
Spot on! Conservatives cannot get this. It's too conservative for even them. 🤣 They simply don't get the concept that First Amendment applies only to the government simply because the government is the ultimate power, and the First Amendment prevents the government from picking and choosing what the government likes to hear or does not like to hear. That's called oppression and that is why it is important for the government not to be able to infringe on speech. But even SCOTUS has ruled that inciting violence is not part of protected First Amendment rights because it is not necessary for the free exchange of ideas, and it is actually the free exchange of ideas, without interference from the government, that is protected by First Amendment rights.
 
And 5 years on. Nothing. But that doesn't matter, and isn't it ironic none of them want to discuss Kushner? Not a word. Even when asked.
Facts are only facts when those facts agree with their position.

Their can be nothing wrong with Kushner because that would mean that they have to admit there is something wrong with themselves and their ability to discern facts.

Many people are afraid of making mistakes. Personally, I don't understand why as recognizing mistakes is the only path to correcting them and becoming better human beings.
 
Such as pushing the Russia collusion hoax, Jussie Smollett hoax, Covington high school kids hoax, Kyle Rittenhouse hoax, impeachment hoax, peaceful protest, Bubba Wallace noose hoax, Trump's tax returns, etc, etc ... ya that wouldn't be Fox. Try again.
Most of this stuff isnt a hoax, like Russian collusion, which was very real. The fact that you think Russian collusion was a hoax in the face of sooooo much evidence shows you're extremely ignorant on these things and you only believe what you want to believe. Also know as the Dunning Kruger effect.
 
The NYP along with several others including the FBI had Hunters hard drive. If that isn't proof then I don't know what is.
No, they didn't. That **** is made up to distract stupid people who believe what they want to be true instead of what's actually true.
 
Most of this stuff isnt a hoax, like Russian collusion, which was very real. The fact that you think Russian collusion was a hoax in the face of sooooo much evidence shows you're extremely ignorant on these things and you only believe what you want to believe. Also know as the Dunning Kruger effect.
🤔

 
Link please because there are literally hundreds of copies of his hard drive.
And still nothing about criminal wrong doing. So get back to me when there are charges filed. I am sure as hell going to get back to you when charges are filed on the Kush.
And after Don Jr is sentenced (thought I forgot about that? 🤣)

🤔

See, the thing is, people on the left can see that they deserved the fine. They screwed up and had to pay the price.

And that's one of the big differences between the right and the left.
When we know our side did something wrong, we want them brought to justice.
You people want yours to run for office. That's called the Jellyfish effect.
 
Get back to me when there are charges filed. I am sure as hell going to get back to you when charges are filed on the Kush.
And after Don Jr is sentenced (thought I didn't know about that? 🤣)


See, the thing is, people on the left can see that they deserved the fine. They screwed up and had to pay the price.

And that's one of the big differences between the right and the left.
When we know our side did something wrong, we want them brought to justice.
You people want yours to run for office.
She lied, her law firm lied which lead to a two year bs investigation in an attempt to impeach a democratically elected US President
 
She lied, her law firm lied which lead to a two year bs investigation in an attempt to impeach a democratically elected US President
jerry-funny.gif


What piece of evidence was proven false in the oranges' impeachment?

Even Fox and OAN knows that trashy dossier still didn't discredit the Russia investigation!

The whole reason the investigation was started was because WikiLeaks released Democratic emails stolen by Russian hackers.

BEFORE THE STEELE DOSSIER WAS OBTAINED!

You, sir, are the gift that keeps on giving!
 
jerry-funny.gif


What piece of evidence was proven false in the oranges' impeachment?

Even Fox and OAN knows that trashy dossier still didn't discredit the Russia investigation!

The whole reason the investigation was started was because WikiLeaks released Democratic emails stolen by Russian hackers.

BEFORE THE STEELE DOSSIER WAS OBTAINED!

You, sir, are the gift that keeps on giving!
The Russia collusion hoax was based on the Steele Dossier. I posted a link showing it was bs. If you know nothing of the investigation then don't post about it.
 
The Russia collusion hoax was based on the Steele Dossier. I posted a link showing it was bs. If you know nothing of the investigation then don't post about it.
Maybe you should have someone read my post for you.
I told you that I though that Steele was "trashy".

I also told you that the dossier came to light more than 2 months after the FBI investigation.

Now, be a man and finally tell me what evidence came out during the hearings and that led to the rightful Impeachment that was not factual?

In the meantime, I strongly suggest you read this well sourced article.
CAUTION - It has the truth and the facts (I know how you all hate that).


And I should remind you that the hearings official report was the Mueller report.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back