Europe fines Temu $232 million over illegal and unsafe product listings

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,587   +973
Staff
Cheap Fake Potato: The European Commission has concluded the first part of its investigation into Temu's business practices. The Chinese online marketplace for low-cost goods is not doing enough to prevent the sale of illegal products, thereby violating a key requirement of Europe's new rules for large digital marketplaces.

The European Commission has announced its second fine ever against an international company for violating the Digital Services Act. Temu, the controversial Chinese online marketplace for low-cost products, was found to have played a role in the sale of illegal goods that could have harmed consumers in the European Union.

The EC fined Temu €200 million (about $232 million), stating that the company failed to properly assess the risks associated with unlawful products sold through its platform. Brussels authorities said European customers were likely encouraged to purchase illegal goods, as the platform is saturated with low-cost knockoffs that are not effectively filtered.

Although the investigation began in 2024 and is still ongoing, the EC said it had gathered sufficient evidence to impose an initial fine. According to regulators, the company provided a generic risk assessment that lacked specific analysis of its own platform and did not adequately reflect its reporting or testing efforts.

Furthermore, Temu underestimated how frequently illegal goods were being offered to European customers. A "mystery shopping" investigation conducted on behalf of the Commission found that a significant share of products on Temu would fail basic safety tests. Affected items reportedly included baby toys containing unsafe levels of hazardous chemicals, posing potential safety risks to children.

Temu also did not conduct a serious assessment of its platform's design. The EC said the Chinese marketplace was effectively encouraging the sale of illegal goods through promotional programs advertised by influencers affiliated with the platform.

Under the DSA, Temu and other "very large" online platforms are required to assess potential systemic risks to consumers and adopt appropriate mitigation measures when such risks are identified.

According to the EC, the lack of a proper risk assessment constitutes a significant violation of the DSA. The €200 million fine was determined based on the nature of the violation, the number of affected EU users, and the duration of the misconduct. Temu now has until August 28 to submit an "action plan" to bring the platform into compliance with EU regulations, as required under Article 75 of the DSA.

Without an adequate compliance plan or meaningful corrective action, the Chinese company could face additional periodic fines.

In a statement to Reuters, Temu said it was willing to cooperate with the European Commission. The company also argued that the 2024 assessment cited by Brussels no longer reflects how the ecommerce platform currently operates.

Companies found to be in violation of the DSA can face fines of up to 6% of their annual global revenue. In 2025, the European Commission imposed its first DSA-related fine on Elon Musk's X platform. In that case, cooperation was reportedly not part of the strategy.

Permalink to story:

 
Not sure why people need to be protected... wow, an item that usually costs $500 costs $39.99 - I should buy it!!!

You get what you pay for....

Alas, it's really hard to protect people from their own greed and stupidity.
 
The "mystery shopping" investigation is genuinely one of the better regulatory tools I've seen deployed. Having someone actually buy stuff, test it, and find hazardous chemicals in baby toys is a lot harder to argue with than abstract compliance metrics. That said, €200M against a company doing tens of billions in GMV is more of a rounding error than a deterrent.
 
The part about influencer-promoted illegal goods is doing a lot of work here and not getting enough attention. It's one thing to have counterfeit listings slip through... every large marketplace deals with that. It's another to have your affiliate marketing apparatus actively amplifying them.
 
So, they were fined $200 million dollars. That would be like $100 dollars to you and me.


As of 2025, Temu's annual revenue was approximately $92.5 billion, with a projected growth rate of 35-40% for 2026.
Now instead of revenue, how much PROFIT did they make? Because revenue doesnt matter, profit does. If they have 1% margins then the 200 million is gonna sting a lot more then if they have 10% or 30%.

Also how much of that is from the Euro market?
 
So, they were fined $200 million dollars. That would be like $100 dollars to you and me.


As of 2025, Temu's annual revenue was approximately $92.5 billion, with a projected growth rate of 35-40% for 2026.
Right, but that's total GLOBAL revenue, not specifically EU revenue. I'm willing to bet most of that $92.5 billion comes from the US not from the EU. Americans are absolute gluttons when it comes to buying mountains of useless crap for cheap.
 
Not sure why people need to be protected... wow, an item that usually costs $500 costs $39.99 - I should buy it!!!

You get what you pay for....

Alas, it's really hard to protect people from their own greed and stupidity.
Because many products are not sold at a discount with fake packaging and fake stickers on them. Or because many products arrive made from different materials than what was advertised and are not up to spec, which leads to dangerous situations.

And these Temu products can end on on other local stores/eshops, being resold by pathetic scammers. This happens often where I live. The local eshop market place is packed full of fakes from temu.

Expecting consumers to navigate every meticulously made fake and every problematic product makes zero sense. It's why we elect officials. We pay them to do their job.

Even I can't tell which ones are fake sometimes. For example:
tu7Uo9Wejv9LnCbVLfAFaL.jpg
 
Last edited:
Check out BigCliveDotCom on YouTube if you enjoy seeing someone take apart 'exciting' electrical items from China. Some of the things he reviews are literally deathtraps.
 
EU is "bad" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe US goods & practices, EU is "passable" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe Chinese goods & practises. Someone here might possibly has mental problems.
Before one determines whether EU is good or bad, one might ask where the money from these fines goes.
 
Before one determines whether EU is good or bad, one might ask where the money from these fines goes.
The general EU budget which reduces the amount all member states have to contribute. We probably built a few highways in Romania using money from the fines :)
 
EU is "bad" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe US goods & practices, EU is "passable" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe Chinese goods & practises. Someone here might possibly has mental problems.

Who said the EU was bad in that context?

Also, apples to hand grenades…
 
EU is "bad" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe US goods & practices, EU is "passable" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe Chinese goods & practises. Someone here might possibly has mental problems.

I was thinking the exact same thing. Saw right through it. ^^ Typical western lens.

Right, but that's total GLOBAL revenue, not specifically EU revenue. I'm willing to bet most of that $92.5 billion comes from the US not from the EU. Americans are absolute gluttons when it comes to buying mountains of useless crap for cheap.

The €200 million penalty is pocket change to PDD Holdings (1.6% of annual profit), but it would wipe out roughly 1.5–2 years of Whaleco's pre-tax profit if EU profitability stays at 2024 levels.
 
Last edited:
Not sure why people need to be protected... wow, an item that usually costs $500 costs $39.99 - I should buy it!!!

You get what you pay for....

Alas, it's really hard to protect people from their own greed and stupidity.
Ehhh although I'd 'mostly' agree with that, it goes the other way around as well.
There's so much stuff sold for stupidly high prices just because they can get away with it without the quality being any better than a product 1/10 the cost.

Temu is awful in all aspects imo and I don't understand the hype when Aliexpress has been around for ages. The ratio of decent products to crap on Aliexpress is MUCH better, on par with Amazon even I'd say (unless you're really going out of your way to ensure you're getting crap). Heck, even if their support is decent - I've been refunded for both undelivered and defective products.
 
Do not buy kitchen items there. They use metals and plastics that are not suitable for food industry.
You can damage your body organs if you use those.
 
EU is "bad" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe US goods & practices, EU is "passable" when protecting Its citizens from unsafe Chinese goods & practises. Someone here might possibly has mental problems.

Considering the U.S. standards on hazardous chemicals and children's items, I seriously doubt they've imported anything "bad" to the EU. China's standards for hazardous substances and environmental standards leaves a TON to be desired. Musk is being hit for speech issues, not safety.

As for the pricing, China ensures that they undercut foreign manufactures to eliminate competition any way they can, mostly through subsidies knock offs. and IP theft.
 
Before one determines whether EU is good or bad, one might ask where the money from these fines goes.

It's the EU we are talking about. Where could possibly the money from these fines end up?

1. "Integrating" jihadists in European society, especially in France, Germany and BENELUX 2. Radical pro islamic propaganda, 3. WOKEism, 4. SLIIAVA UKRAEENEEE.
 
Back