Europe proposes backdoors in encrypted platforms under new security strategy

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,566   +955
Staff
In a nutshell: The European Commission is developing a new strategy to enhance internal security across the entire European Union. The plan introduces a cultural shift in how internal security is perceived, but some aspects of the proposal could potentially weaken digital security instead.

The recently announced ProtectEU plan aims to safeguard Europe from internal threats, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated, emphasizing that security is a fundamental pillar of open societies and thriving economies. Among the most pressing threats identified by the European Commission are terrorism, organized crime, cybercrime, and attacks on critical infrastructure.

The EC is positioning ProtectEU as a broad initiative in response to an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape. With hybrid threats and state-sponsored cyberattacks wreaking havoc online, Europe urgently needs a significant overhaul of its internal security strategy. While ProtectEU does not yet include a detailed proposal, the official announcement outlines several key objectives as a foundation for the plan.

ProtectEU advocates for a new security governance framework, aiming to transform the European Commission's approach to internal security. The initiative calls on EU member states to enhance intelligence-sharing practices through a newly proposed platform, the Single Intelligence Analysis Capacity. Additionally, the Commission envisions expanding Europol's role, effectively transforming it into a European equivalent of the FBI, with enhanced operational capabilities.

The most intriguing – and concerning – aspect of ProtectEU from a technological standpoint is its focus on Europol's expanded enforcement tools, which are intended to address increasingly complex criminal investigations involving digital information. The plan includes provisions for "lawful access to data," outlining a technology roadmap that targets encryption and evaluates the EU's current data retention rules.

Granting Europol the ability to access encrypted data can only mean one thing: Brussels is proposing some form of government-mandated backdoor for communication platforms protected by end-to-end encryption. These systems are notoriously difficult to breach, making them a challenge for law enforcement. However, security researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that implementing so-called "lawful" backdoors is inherently flawed as such vulnerabilities would inevitably be discovered, accessed, and exploited by cybercriminals and black-hat hackers.

It remains to be seen how the EU plans to move forward with its encryption-breaking ambitions, though expectations for a practical or effective outcome are low. Meanwhile, the ProtectEU initiative also includes proposals to strengthen digital infrastructure, tighten regulations against organized crime networks, and expand international cooperation, particularly with Latin America and the Mediterranean region.

Notably, the European Commission makes no mention of new partnership initiatives with the United States.

Permalink to story:

 
I mean it is Europe it makes sense freedoms never really been a thing there All of European history except for the last 70 to 80 years has been under constitutional monarchies or absolute monarchies and empires, so this just sounds like you're getting back to its roots.

But what will happen is companies will simply do what they do anytime the eu demands back doors they'll simply disabling encryption in the Eurozone they're not going to give you a back door they're just going to disable encryption inside of your territory leaving all of your communications vulnerable but that's what your government wants.

Again tell me how your people are free?
 
Senile pensioners running the world that is completely out of touch with reality changes. That led to WWI WWII and seems like we're steamrolling to WWIII. Sure way to ruin any business let the grandpa run it, aground.
 
I mean it is Europe it makes sense freedoms never really been a thing there All of European history except for the last 70 to 80 years has been under constitutional monarchies or absolute monarchies and empires, so this just sounds like you're getting back to its roots.

But what will happen is companies will simply do what they do anytime the eu demands back doors they'll simply disabling encryption in the Eurozone they're not going to give you a back door they're just going to disable encryption inside of your territory leaving all of your communications vulnerable but that's what your government wants.

Again tell me how your people are free?
Wow the irony in this comment.
Most European countries rank in the top 20 in terms of freedom. The US is #61, behind many developing countries. And that was before the ongoing transition to totalitarian autocracy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_freedom_indices
 
However, security researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that implementing so-called "lawful" backdoors is inherently flawed as such vulnerabilities would inevitably be discovered, accessed, and exploited by cybercriminals and black-hat hackers.
This is the real problem. There are no ways to include back-doors into any system connected to the internet without criminals finding them and exploiting them. This idea of the EU lawmakers is lacking all sense and intelligence. Pathetic.

Law enforcement doesn't need backdoors. They need to do their jobs better and quit looking for shortcuts.
 
Mass surveillance and control is only good when the "Good guys" do it.
Not a problem.
These are VERIFIED Good Guys and they will never turn and leak or abuse the secrets. Guaranteed! Btw while at it they should also outlaw WHISPERING as this is technically encrypted speech!
In the REAL WORLD these backdoors will be out on the street in no time.
Of course the gist of the story is that the fools behind this silly scheme are AFRAID. Afraid of the people they should be nurturing and protecting.
 
Wow the irony in this comment.
Most European countries rank in the top 20 in terms of freedom. The US is #61, behind many developing countries. And that was before the ongoing transition to totalitarian autocracy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_freedom_indices
Yes Europe ranking Europe on freedom give me a break. You guys don't even have free speech because you have hate speech laws that say saying anything opposed to set doctrines is a crime so don't even try. Because unless I can stand in downtown Paris or burn and shout Islam is terrorism and abortion is murder in Jesus is the way the truth and the life and all other past lead to hell and damnation and being gay is a sin then you don't have freedom because in Europe those things are all criminal.
 
Just the wording ProtectEU sounds like SchutzStaffel (SS meaning Protective Echelon) although not as sinister and barbaric as the SS, but now meaning differently in a different World, the EU is pulling more towards Regulation domination which...

When I hear democracy of the people by the EU it really means democracy of the Government.
 
Yes Europe ranking Europe on freedom give me a break. You guys don't even have free speech because you have hate speech laws that say saying anything opposed to set doctrines is a crime so don't even try. Because unless I can stand in downtown Paris or burn and shout Islam is terrorism and abortion is murder in Jesus is the way the truth and the life and all other past lead to hell and damnation and being gay is a sin then you don't have freedom because in Europe those things are all criminal.
The irony again. This ranking is actually made by an US institution, Freedom House. Oops.
Yes, in Europe hate speech and racism in public can in some contexts be unlawful if it incites violence. FYI this is a good thing, just like physical violence is also unlawful.
You guys you can't even drink a beer with your buds in the street or in a park
😅
Take your time, read that list again, and look at yourself in the mirror.
 
Pretty much everything that comes from Ursula von Something and the herds of bureaucrats around her is preposterous, but enhancing security by poking security holes beats everything ... for now.
 
Not a problem.
These are VERIFIED Good Guys and they will never turn and leak or abuse the secrets. Guaranteed! Btw while at it they should also outlaw WHISPERING as this is technically encrypted speech!
In the REAL WORLD these backdoors will be out on the street in no time.
Of course the gist of the story is that the fools behind this silly scheme are AFRAID. Afraid of the people they should be nurturing and protecting.
In the past, when most people were religious and unknowing, they could scare you into submission with tales of the devil and hell.

Now they can't even scare the religious people with that, as they're in general more knowledgeable in modern times.

So they're trying to get more control, UBI(Universal Basic Income) will be one of the main things they'll scare you with if you don't follow their rules, mass-surveillance on- and offline will be one of the other major parts of their toolkit.
 
The irony again. This ranking is actually made by an US institution, Freedom House. Oops.
Yes, in Europe hate speech and racism in public can in some contexts be unlawful if it incites violence. FYI this is a good thing, just like physical violence is also unlawful.
You guys you can't even drink a beer with your buds in the street or in a park
😅
Take your time, read that list again, and look at yourself in the mirror.

Nope you don't have free speech, hate speech is constantly redefined, it always is. when you can classify biblical truths as hate speech you lack freedom, its that simple.
 
I would agree to a physical key - but never a virtual one.
E.g. when they apprehend me (or anyone else) they have the device and insert a key there so it unlocks.
This paradigm just follows the existing custody concept.
But never remotely without knowledge.
 
Back