European Parliament narrowly votes in its divisive Copyright Directive

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 2,645   +616
Staff member

After kicking it around the European Parliament for three years, the EU has finally passed its Copyright Directive. The contentious law was first proposed in 2016 and has been voted down as overbearing numerous times. The last time was back in January of this year.

The main complaints against the directive, which was nicknamed the “Link Tax” by opponents, involved two articles within the legislation — Article 11 and Article 13 (now named Article 17).

Article 11 requires news aggregators to pay for quoted material that goes beyond “individual words or very short extracts.” The problem is that the terms and definitions used in the language of the law are very vague.

Article 17 makes platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Google responsible for content uploaded by users. In other words, if someone uploads copyrighted material, it is no longer the user who is held responsible, it is the platform that is at fault.

Opponents say these two portions of the law will overly restrict how information is shared online. YouTube content creators and Google have been vocally against the measure.

Google complains, "[The directive will] lead to legal uncertainty and will hurt Europe’s creative and digital economies."

Even the EU parliament itself has been divided on the rules over the years. Tuesday’s vote illustrated that fact as the law narrowly passed by less than 75 votes, 348-274.

Since its rejection in January lawmakers have revised the rules to include some protections to freedom of expression. Memes and GIFs, for example, are now excluded from falling under the restrictions. “Startup” platforms are also being allowed some leeway, which would seem to indicate that the law was primarily targeted toward big firms like Google, Facebook, and others.

Now that parliament has passed the regulations it is up to member states to accept them. They will then have two years to put measures in place to implement the law.

“The details matter, and we look forward to working with policy makers, publishers, creators and rights holders as EU member states move to implement these new rules,” Google Europe tweeted.

There is still bound to be an intense debate on the issue over the next couple of years as nations work to implement and enforce the law.

Permalink to story.

 

Zorak

Posts: 50   +16
Good luck with Twitch. I feel a ban on that service in EU. Developing a live-streaming content filter is just madness. Imagine the costs. THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morris Minor

Hexic

Posts: 803   +881
TechSpot Elite
The good old EU doing EU things. Have fun with this dumpster fire, because it won’t work out.

Perhaps Brexit would be a more productive use of legislative time for the EU instead...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knot Schure

Puiu

Posts: 4,149   +2,793
TechSpot Elite
The good old EU doing EU things. Have fun with this dumpster fire, because it won’t work out.

Perhaps Brexit would be a more productive use of legislative time for the EU instead...
That's UK's dumpster fire problem, the EU already did what it had to. :p
 

Archean

Posts: 5,631   +91
The good old EU doing EU things. Have fun with this dumpster fire, because it won’t work out.

Perhaps Brexit would be a more productive use of legislative time for the EU instead...
That's UK's dumpster fire problem, the EU already did what it had to. :p
Perhaps it can spur Bexiteers on, and motivate them to finish the job at hand.
 

Puiu

Posts: 4,149   +2,793
TechSpot Elite
Perhaps it can spur Bexiteers on, and motivate them to finish the job at hand.
I'm fairly divided on this subject. On the one had I want the UK not to leave the UE so I can visit it freely and so that the EU is bigger and more united. On the other hand I can already see many big IT companies and start-ups leaving the UK and moving where I live driving salaries higher and higher.
 

Knot Schure

Posts: 297   +128
This is going to be good - for nobody.

The EU can **** up a cup of coffee.

Imagine trying to tax the internet's content - I see servers moving overseas (like Poker did), and two fat fingers to the EU. Cue all the latest tech minds following said servers etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morris Minor