FCC officially green lights the T-Mobile / Sprint merger

Cal Jeffrey

TS Evangelist
Staff member

Earlier this year, the big dollar acquisition had the government split down the middle with the Department of Justice wanting to deny the deal and the FCC leaning to approve it. In July, the DoJ changed its stance and decided it would back down from its opposition.

Now the FCC has formally given the merger the green light. However, the agreement comes with some conditions that the joining must meet.

The Commission approved the deal believing that it would advance 5G deployment. The companies have said that they would have 5G service to 97 percent of its customers within the next three years. They additionally promised to bring 100Mbps or better to 90 percent of subscribers by the end of 2025.

The FCC said that these terms are acceptable, but that if the conditions are not met, the company will face over $2 billion in fines. The press release noted that the merger would not detrimentally affect market competition. However, not all the commissioners agreed. The vote to approve just three weeks ago was split down party lines.

"The parties also pledged that within six years, 90% of Americans would have access to mobile service with speeds of at least 100 Mbps and 99% of Americans would have access to speeds of at least 50 Mbps."

"While I hope for the sake of consumers that I am wrong, I fear that we will one day look back at this decision and recognize it as a moment that forever changed the U.S. wireless industry, and not for the better," said Democratic Commissioner Geoffrey Starks.

Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, also a Democrat, voiced similar concerns comparing the merger to those in the airline and pharmaceutical industries. She pointed to higher luggage fees and medication costs as examples of what can happen when you start consolidating an industry.

"There's no reason to think the mobile-phone industry will be different," Rosenworcel said.

Sentiments have not changed much since the October 16 vote, with one side of the Commission still opposed.

"While the parties promise their merger will accelerate the availability of some form of '5G' for some Americans, history teaches us that the most likely effect of this merger will be higher prices and fewer options for all Americans," Starks said in a statement Tuesday.

The acquisition is far from final, though. Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, along with 17 other attorneys general, filed a lawsuit challenging the deal. They believe the merger "would hurt competition, raise prices for cell service, result in a loss of retail jobs and lower wages for the employees who remain."

We will have to see how that plays out in the courts.

Image credit: Reuters/Dado Ruvic

Permalink to story.

 

OptimumSlinky

TS Maniac
Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, also a Democrat, voiced similar concerns comparing the merger to those in the airline and pharmaceutical industries. She pointed to higher luggage fees and medication costs as examples of what can happen when you start consolidating an industry.

"There's no reason to think the mobile-phone industry will be different," Rosenworcel said.
Well, at least some of them have a brain and tried.
 

Uncle Al

TS Evangelist
You know, it seems that every time two of these large companies merge they claim they will be more efficient and able to save the consumers money, but somehow they never get to that 2nd part. Perhaps, as a part of the approval of merger they could be forced to produce evidence of these claims and made to take out and huge "performance bond" that will pay the end users $$ in case they fail to produce the claimed results. Oh yes, and that bond should be made to be perpetual, say for a 10 year period.
 

trparky

TS Evangelist
For all of you who are against this merger, think about it this way. Sprint needs the merger, they're on death's doorstep. Sprint's network is absolute garbage, I wouldn't wish that garbage network even on my worst enemy; even he doesn't deserve that kind of torture, that would be cruel and unusual punishment. So without the merger Sprint's dead anyways, they NEED T-Mobile if they have a chance in hell of surviving.

To those who are against this merger, basically you're saying that you want Sprint to die and not only that but all of their spectrum assets to go to that of AT&T and Verizon because you know that's going to happen. T-Mobile ain't going to be getting any of it, the big two will snatch it up fast. Merging will be the only way T-Mobile gets anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danny101

Impudicus

TS Addict
"The Commission approved the deal believing that it would advance 5G deployment." Just curious what will we be able to do on 5G that we can not do now?
 

Christiaaan

TS Enthusiast
Medication rose because of all american's requirement to have Health Insurance just like how Education prices rose when all the government grants took over.

When the government gets involved they fk things up, just how the dems showed over and over again.

This won't cause prices to rise, since Dish and spectrum are now in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danny101

Danny101

TS Guru
I'm for this deal. A T-Mobile/Sprint merger means we'll have 3 titans battling it out instead of just 2. Room can still be made for more. Verizon and AT&T prices are too high as it is and this merger inserts some competition in this space and prices should level out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trparky