G.Skill settles class action lawsuit over deceptive memory speed claims for $2.4 million

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 991   +14
Staff
TL;DR: G.Skill has agreed to settle a class-action lawsuit over claims that it falsely advertised the speed of its memory products. As part of the settlement, the company will pay up to $2.4 million to customers who purchased eligible DRAM products in the US between January 31, 2018, and January 7, 2026.

The plaintiffs claimed that G.Skill violated federal consumer protection laws by falsely advertising the speeds of its DDR4 desktop memory modules, rated above 2133 MHz, and DDR5 DIMMs, rated over 4800 MHz. The lawsuit argued that the misleading labeling led customers to believe the advertised speeds could be achieved by default, without any overclocking or BIOS adjustments.

Class members contend that the company should have made it clear that running the memory modules at the advertised speeds requires premium motherboards and technical expertise. They also note that regular users would see no benefit from the higher-priced products if they are unwilling or unable to tweak their systems to reach the modules' full capacity.

To be eligible for a payout, customers must have purchased G.Skill DDR4 desktop memory with a rated speed above 2133 MHz or DDR5 RAM rated over 4800 MHz. The settlement only covers desktop memory – not laptop SODIMMs – and only individuals who were legal residents of the US at the time of purchase qualify.

Class members can claim compensation for up to five products without providing proof of purchase. Claims for additional products beyond five will require proof of purchase. Eligible class members will receive a pro rata share of whatever remains of the $2.4 million settlement fund after attorneys' fees and administration costs are paid.

To file a claim, class members can submit the online form or download the PDF version and mail it to the settlement administrator at the address listed on the form. Payout options include virtual prepaid cards, PayPal, Venmo, Zelle, and physical checks. The deadline to file claims is April 7, 2026, and the final approval hearing is scheduled for June 5, 2026.

G.Skill denied violating any laws but agreed to update its packaging and marketing language to clarify that advertised speeds can only be achieved through manual adjustments. The company will now list top speeds as "up to" and include an explicit warning that overclocking and BIOS adjustments are required.

Permalink to story:

 
Bulls**t class action lawyers with bulls**t class action lawsuits make bulls**t amounts of money.

- or -

Yet another Tuesday in the United States of Dystopia.
Up to five products without proof of purchase is wild. I guarantee you there are people filing claims right now who've never even heard of G.Skill before today. Just gonna click yes I totally bought five kits of DDR4-4000 RAM between 2018 and 2026, send me my $37 virtual prepaid card. The lawyers are probably walking away with a million bucks while actual customers split the remaining $1.4 million between 50,000 claimants.
 
Wait so they're admitting that every PC builder who's ever just slapped RAM into a motherboard and called it a day has been running their expensive high-speed memory at stock JEDEC speeds this whole time? That's hilarious. There are definitely people out there who paid extra for 3600MHz RGB sticks and have been chugging along at 2133MHz for years without ever enabling XMP.

Literally every RAM manufacturer does this exact same thing. Corsair, Kingston, Crucial, TeamGroup, they all slap big numbers on the box knowing full well that grandma buying a prebuilt Dell is never seeing those speeds. G.Skill just had the misfortune of getting sued first.
 
Literally every RAM manufacturer does this exact same thing. Corsair, Kingston, Crucial, TeamGroup, they all slap big numbers on the box knowing full well that grandma buying a prebuilt Dell is never seeing those speeds. G.Skill just had the misfortune of getting sued first.

G.Skill isn't even the first RAM company to be sued over this non-issue. Corsair settled a similar lawsuit last year.

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-com...nt-covers-u-s-purchases-between-2018-and-2025
 
Up to five products without proof of purchase is wild. I guarantee you there are people filing claims right now who've never even heard of G.Skill before today. Just gonna click yes I totally bought five kits of DDR4-4000 RAM between 2018 and 2026, send me my $37 virtual prepaid card. The lawyers are probably walking away with a million bucks while actual customers split the remaining $1.4 million between 50,000 claimants.

Hey, don’t judge me.

That’s like 3 free footlong subs at Subway.
 
Up to five products without proof of purchase is wild. I guarantee you there are people filing claims right now who've never even heard of G.Skill before today. Just gonna click yes I totally bought five kits of DDR4-4000 RAM between 2018 and 2026, send me my $37 virtual prepaid card. The lawyers are probably walking away with a million bucks while actual customers split the remaining $1.4 million between 50,000 claimants.

That is true. But customers basically did nothing while the lawyers did all the work here. The group of lawyers were working on contingency pay here - they only get paid if they win, and they probably get paid a % of the winnings.

If you dont like how these lawyers were paid a percentage then all of us who will get reimbursed should have paid the lawyer's hourly fee instead and paid them upfront...regardless of whether they win or lose.

If we as consumers are not willing to pay lawyers upfront and pay them regardless of whether they win, then this is the next best thing for consumer rights.
 
I did not know that you can sue someone else for your own incompetence. If you are going to buy something that you don't understand, stop blaming the manufacturer. Read the motherboard manual... oh wait, reading is the problem here probably.

The person behind this should simply stop trying to modify his PC himself.
 
Denies any wrongdoing, but still agreed to pay the lawsuit...... hmmm....
That's extremely common with these sorts of lawsuits; if the company admitted to wrong doing in this case then that would make it easier for people/agenices in other jurisdictions to go after them as well. Imagine if say the UK regulatory agencies decided to go after them for deceptive packaging; it would look really bad for G.Skill if they had previously admitted that it was somewhere else.
 
Back