First of all here you are saying you are "anti-stupidity". Yet you have guts to say that people who don't share your point of view are immoral and "totally biased". Maybe you could start using those anti-stupidity methods to improve yourself before posting such crap.Richy2k9 said:
yeah it's me, anti-hacking, anti-piracy, anti-stupidity ... & all i can see that this site isn't what it used to be, with some exception, a lot have gone the wrong side of the road & think they are defending THEIR rights while being totally biased by THEIR immoral taste.
Apparently because you don't seem to know: PS3 used to include Other OS option. It was one of the reasons why I bought the machine. This option was removed from the device. Now I do not claim to own the technology, but you can't really claim, that after I buy something the manufacturer has all the rights to remove valuable features from the device. You would prolly go all out nerd-rage if after buying a box of M&Ms the sales person comes to you and decides to remove all the blue colored ones.Richy2k9 said:
1st - GeoHot did something wrong to some...
2nd - If he wanted this so bad, he could have kept it for himself, not release to the public, to this he's as stupid man as he may be intelligent hacker.
3rd - STOP IT with i buy it, i OWN it...
George didn't do anything wrong. He's defending our rights to have access to those features we have already paid.
I think it's pretty evil to sue someone over few lines of base16, threaten everyone posting the said strings and trying to force Google to hand over the private information of those persons.Richy2k9 said:
4th - I see a lot of hypocrite, well SONY, like any other big business is E.V.I.L,..
So you're basically arguing that everyone who doesn't share you point of view is not just immoral and hypocrite (as stated above) but also pathetic. What a funny anti-stupidity person you are. Megainternets to you sir!Richy2k9 said:
NO ONE OWNS anything, we are here to live our life by doing the less bad things towards others, if you don't understand this, i don't feel like you will ever understand anything, so flame me & show how pathetic you are.
People do have priorities. Some people also can afford supporting more than just one good cause, for example donating money to both: cancer research and to support the unjust claims of Sony against the George Hotz.Richy2k9 said:
Anyone who donated to this guy, really should learn what are priorities ... even if i had that much money to waste, i wouldn't send a penny to him, he's getting what he deserves, i don't want him to be imprisoned or going broke... Again in my part of the world, we do make donations to help, not far than this morning was touched by our solidarity to help a 7 year old kid, he's got leukemia & being treated in India..
to this, please do yourself a favor, do think about all this & when you will be the one being exploited by future GeoHot look-alike, come & say that he is right.
Other than that your argument is pretty lame: throwing in a touching story about a cancer patient in India to draw attention from the point that your only argument was that the money given to someone is away from the someone else. And the context of this article was?