bclaymiles
Posts: 458 +402
For yall using Brave.
In 2016, Brave promised to remove banner ads from websites and replace
them with their own, basically trying to extract money directly from
websites without the consent of their owners
In 2016, CEO Brendan Eich unilaterally added a fringe, pay-to-win
Wikipedia clone into the default search engine list.
In 2017, they terminated the alternative browser Link Bubble, which they
had bought earlier.
In 2018, Tom Scott and other creators noticed Brave was soliciting
donations in their names without their knowledge or consent.
In 2019, Brave taunted Firefox users who visited their homepage.
In 2020, Brave got caught injecting URLs with affiliate codes when users
tried browsing to various websites.
In 2020, they silently started injecting ads into their home page
backgrounds, pocketing the revenue. There was a lot of pushback: "the
sponsored backgrounds give a bad first impression."
In 2021, Brave's TOR window was found leaking DNS queries, and a patch
was only widely deployed after articles called them out.
In 2022, Brave floated the idea of further discouraging users from
disabling sponsored messages.
In 2023, Brave got caught installing a paid VPN service on users'
computers without their consent.
In 2023, Brave got caught scraping and reselling people's data with
their custom web crawler, which was designed specifically not to
announce itself to website owners.
In 2024, Brave gave up on providing advanced fingerprint protection,
citing flawed statistics (people who would enable the protection would
likely disable Brave telemetry).
In 2025, Brave staff publish an article endorsing PrivacyTests and say
they "work with legitimate testing sites" like them. This article fails
to disclose PrivacyTests is run by a Brave Senior Architect.
In 2025, Brave taunted people searching for Firefox on the Google Play
Store. (The VP denied this occurred, but also demonstrated ignorance of
multiple different screenshots.)
In 2026, Brave releases a non bloated version called Origin, costs $60
with only 10 activations on Windows/macOS, but is completely free on
Linux. To gain market share and encourage major distros to replace
Firefox as default.
[[citation needed]]
I mean, the whole rant begins with a nonsense claim; Brave displaying their own banner ads over the ones on websites does not "extract money directly from websites" - it prevents websites from earning their commissions from their own ads, while Brave directly earns commisions from _their_ ads presented 'over' those website ads. Which is sh1tty behavior from the word 'go', but it's not what you claimed.
When you start with an objectively false claim, all the rest of the (unsourced) claims are immediately called into question.
I've no feelings about Brave positive or negative. I tried it once years ago, meh, deleted it.