Google introduces agentic AI browsing to Chrome with "Auto Browse"

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,030   +59
Staff
First look: Google is quietly transforming the Chrome browser into an autonomous platform and ChatGPT competitor with the rollout of Auto Browse. Built on Google's Gemini system, the new feature means to shift routine web interactions such as filling out forms, gathering data, and planning itineraries from the user to a digital agent.

The feature marks one of Google's most determined steps toward agentic AI, where software systems carry out tasks through context-aware reasoning and automated control of user interfaces. Auto Browse is now in preview for paid subscribers in the AI Pro and AI Ultra plans, it uses the company's latest Gemini 3 models with architecture influenced by Google's earlier experimental agent framework, Project Mariner.

When an Auto Browse task is started, Chrome spawns dedicated tabs identified by an animated AI icon. The agent can navigate across sites, follow links, and interact with form fields using simulated keyboard and mouse input.

Users do not need to monitor the process; the system sends alerts once a task is complete or when permission is required for sensitive actions such as accessing passwords or initiating payments.

Much like OpenAI's Atlas tool, Auto Browse represents a new layer of abstraction between human intent and the web interface. Instead of instructing the browser directly, users describe goals, and Gemini interprets and executes them step by step. This allows multiple background tasks to run simultaneously, an approach designed to reduce cognitive load for repetitive browsing work.

From this side window, Gemini can coordinate with other Google services like Gmail, Calendar, Maps, YouTube, Shopping, and Flights, directly within Chrome.

A new interface accompanies these features. The once-static Gemini button in Chrome now opens by default in a persistent Sidepanel view rather than a pop-up, giving the AI continuous access to the current page. From this side window, Gemini can coordinate with other Google services like Gmail, Calendar, Maps, YouTube, Shopping, and Flights, directly within Chrome.

Image editing is also available via Nano Banana, enabling in-browser editing without downloading files. Users can toggle between the faster standard model and the higher-fidelity Gemini Pro when performing visual tasks.

Auto Browse's operation remains cloud-dependent however. All page interactions initiated by the agent are streamed to Google's servers for processing by Gemini models.

According to company documentation, page content may be temporarily logged to a user's account and retained in the Gemini Apps Activity data, depending on privacy settings. Google has not confirmed whether content accessed during Auto Browse sessions contributes to training future AI systems.

AI Pro subscribers can initiate up to 20 browsing tasks per day, while AI Ultra users get 200 daily sessions. Although the preview does not require an extra purchase, access for free-tier users has not yet been announced.

Google says protective rules prevent the AI from executing transactional steps, such as submitting payment information without explicit user confirmation. In practice, Auto Browse can identify items for purchase and fill order forms, but it will stop before final checkout.

Whether users trust an algorithm to navigate and act on their behalf, though, may determine how soon agentic browsing moves from experimental preview to mainstream use.

Permalink to story:

 
Honestly, it just seems like poor management and sunk costs at this point (which, doesn't only apply to AI).

AI devs want to keep making excuses as to why their "expertise" is needed and why their work is still needed and wanted, while management doesn't have the balls to tell them "no", or are too stupid to see that AI isn't the magic it was promised.
I'm sure there are some fields where AI will shine, but at this point it seems like discernment is out the window while there's money to be made...

It's like touch-focused infotainment consoles in cars; poor management and sunk costs had them keep doubling down on them. Only recently have they begun to pull back seeing that nobody really wanted them (at least, not to replace everything with a clunky touchscreen).
 
My worries with all of these AI driven "agent" systems is that fact that they routinely make mistakes no matter how much AI or safety logic is built in and around them. I develop AI agents at work, and no matter how hard you try, they are not perfect. Hallucinations happen and you can't engineer that out of the current LLM models. It is a fact! That is fine if you build your system around this truth as there are still many things you can do with them. However, I don't know about you, but giving an AI agent my credit card or access to my private information is just asking for trouble. The idea that I would allow it to autonomously do things for me that have serious financial or personal impacts is just crazy.
 
If the browser can browse without a human then they don't need me to watch ads anymore, just spin up 500 million agentic browsers and print your own money, leave me out of it. Google should just go find a corner somewhere to cannibalize themselves for profit until nothing is left.
 
This feels rife for abuse, if I ask it to “find me the cheapest 5090” and it goes off, onto eBay, and buys me something for £300, and all that turns up is a box of stones, I KNOW that’s too cheap, but a non techie person who doesn’t follow this stuff and blindly trusts it?
 
The daily task limits are kind of funny because they make it feel like browsing is turning into a metered resource. Imagine telling someone in 2010 that in the future you’d get 20 AI-powered internet errands per day unless you upgrade to Ultra.
 
If every form you fill out and every page you browse through an agent is being streamed back to servers, it raises the question of whether privacy in a normal sense even exists anymore.
 
Hey Google, I'll tell you where you can shove it! ;)

While 90% of DuckDuckGo users say no to AI, Google wants to shove it
 
There's a sucker born every minute, as the man said. People will be signing up for this garbage by the millions. At least, in the US no doubt. It seems that you just can't educate some people.
 
If the browser can browse without a human then they don't need me to watch ads anymore, just spin up 500 million agentic browsers and print your own money, leave me out of it. Google should just go find a corner somewhere to cannibalize themselves for profit until nothing is left.
google's code is named "adreno"
google's browser is chrome

wtf does that spell.
googlechromefacebookmeta and many many more have nothing benevolent to offer that would excuse their anti-life and past crimes agaist life. which continues growing taking more and leaving no victims living
 
Back