Google says AI now generates 75% of its new code, up from 25% in 2024

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,918   +58
Staff
Bottom line: Google said on Wednesday that about 75% of its new code is now generated by AI and then reviewed by engineers, a figure that marks a sharp increase from recent levels. In October 2024, Google said that about a quarter of its code was generated by AI. By late 2025, that share had doubled to 50%. The latest update shows AI is now a primary method for producing code at Google, rather than a supplemental tool.

The shift is tied closely to Google's internal deployment of its Gemini models, which engineers are using to generate, refactor, and migrate code. The company has also pushed broader use of AI tools beyond engineering, tying their use in some cases to performance reviews.

CEO Sundar Pichai described the shift as part of a broader change in how work gets done at the company. He said Google is moving toward "truly agentic workflows," in which engineers increasingly orchestrate systems that can carry out complex tasks with minimal intervention. He pointed to measurable gains in productivity from these approaches, adding that "Recently, a particularly complex code migration done by agents and engineers working together was completed six times faster than was possible a year ago with engineers alone."

The focus on agentic systems points to a shift away from code-completion tools toward systems that can plan and execute development tasks independently. In practice, that includes codebase migrations, large-scale refactoring, and other operations that historically required sustained human coordination.

The rollout of AI tools has not been uniform across the company. Some teams within Google DeepMind have been allowed to use Anthropic's Claude Code alongside Google's own models, a decision that has reportedly introduced friction among employees over tool standardization and strategy.

Google's approach mirrors a broader shift across large tech companies toward treating AI-generated code as a core part of development. Microsoft has reported similar progress, with CEO Satya Nadella saying in April last year that 20% to 30% of the code in some projects was written by AI. Around the same time, CTO Kevin Scott said he believed 95% of code would be generated by AI within five years.

Meta has also set formal AI usage targets within its engineering teams. Internal documents indicate that, as of the fourth quarter of 2025, the company aimed to have 55% of code changes in certain groups be agent-assisted. For the first half of 2026, some teams are expected to have 65% of engineers use AI to write more than 75% of their committed code.

At Snap, the transition is already reflected in operating models. The company said earlier this month that at least 65% of new code is generated by AI under its current structure.

These changes indicate a shift in the role of developers, with engineers increasingly supervising automated systems rather than writing most code themselves. At Google, where AI already produces most new code, that shift is well underway.

Permalink to story:

 
Is that why Google Maps is now trash?
You're far too intelligent to be posting inane virtue-signaling comments like this. I realize what you really mean by this is, "I don't like Google the company and I despise AI", but Google Maps has an 80%+ market share because it's quite simply the best product out there.
 
And soon enough those existing engineers will end up being replace....but hey! according to A.I apologists Artificial intelligence is nothing to worry about it is "only a generational transition"
 
Google has a backlog of bugs/improvements that they could address, hopefully they could go through them faster than the current pace of 1-5 yrs. I'm not holding my breath :D
 
It will be better unbiased content then what we see when Tim is releasing a hit piece against AMD while ignoring the fact that Nvidia is doing the same thing at scale of a magnitude not even comparable...

Happens all the time...
Your confirmation bias is showing.

People that don't care about brands don't see bias in HUB videos, meanwhile fans on both sides are triggered by the same video. If you look hard enough you will always find what you are looking for.
 
Cool. Same goes for Microsoft. And everyone else. And now I can barely have a single day when something doesn't break.

2 days earlier Windows randomly disabled location access, system-wide. On another machine it even imagined it being disabled by Group Policy, so Settings wouldn't even let me turn it on. Well I checked the group policy, and it was still on "not configured", so no, it wasn't because of GP. But when I explicitly enabled location access via GP, at least it started working.

Yesterday the Logi Options app decided to disable smart actions, because guess what, it randomly decided it's time to sign me out of the app, and of course you need to be signed in for smart actions, because reasons. Oh and Battle.net randomly broke and I couldn't even log in for hours. Oh and they also pushed some update to D2R and now I can't use my mods because it shows some data inconsistency errors.

And today the Logi Options app decided to uninstall itself, the shortcut just became broken, unable to find the executable. Okay? So I had to install it again, and now it's working. For another day.

And this is just the last 3 days. On my PC, all I do is putting out fires. I didn't have to deal with this amount of random trash a few years ago. Coincidence?
 
Is that why Google Maps is now trash?
Just like Nvidia drivers, WIndows updates (actually I dunno about this 1... Windows always sukz lol) and many other things. It is impressive that AI can do this, sure... but it doesn't seem good enough yet. Sad for the people working these jobs too... meh.
 
It will be better unbiased content then what we see when Tim is releasing a hit piece against AMD while ignoring the fact that Nvidia is doing the same thing at scale of a magnitude not even comparable...

Happens all the time...
you’ll just cry about the AI being biased against AMD because AMD is good and therefore cannot do bad things.

Well ignore all the articles crying about everything nvidia does, k? Clearly AMD is in the right restricting software and denying review samples, those reviewers were all BAD people probably.
 
Jokes aside, the most quietly significant line in this whole article is that Google is tying AI tool usage to performance reviews. That's not adoption, that's a mandate with extra steps. When your review score depends on using the tool, the 75% figure becomes a lot less interesting as a data point.
 
Jokes aside, the most quietly significant line in this whole article is that Google is tying AI tool usage to performance reviews. That's not adoption, that's a mandate with extra steps. When your review score depends on using the tool, the 75% figure becomes a lot less interesting as a data point.
I’m sure Google’s management is well aware of how well or badly AI can improve employee performance. Since it’s mandated, it probably improves performance when used correctly. The alternate take is that it’s beneficial from an investor standpoint. Considering Gemini is renown for its intelligence, I’d guess it’s the former.
 
Back