Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and other US tech giants are hiding $1.65 trillion in AI debt

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 994   +14
Staff
Ripple effect: Amid growing talk of an AI bubble, a study by Japanese market analysts has found that five of the largest American technology companies are carrying a collective "hidden" debt of over $1.65 trillion, driven largely by massive spending on AI infrastructure. That undisclosed sum exceeds the $1.35 trillion the same companies have officially reported on their balance sheets, and it has grown eightfold over the past four years.

According to estimates from Nikkei Asia, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle have together amassed roughly $3 trillion in total debt, a large share of it tied to exorbitant AI infrastructure spending – long-term data center lease agreements, along with costly servers, graphics accelerators, and other computing hardware that has yet to be delivered.

The report notes that less than half of the true debt figure appears directly on balance sheets, with the remainder disclosed only in accounting footnotes attached to SEC filings. Nikkei was careful to point out that the financial commitments behind this debt are legal under US law, but that the way they're reported makes it harder for retail investors to accurately gauge these companies' financial health.

Credit: App Economy Insights

Of the five companies in the study, Meta carries the largest estimated hidden debt, at around $420 billion – nearly three times what it disclosed in its FY 2026 financial statement.

The company's Hyperion data center in Louisiana, for instance, includes a $27 billion investment from Blue Owl Capital that never appeared in its official earnings report. It's a fully legal maneuver under current US accounting rules, but one that illustrates just how much can stay out of view.

Oracle's hidden debt has grown roughly 30-fold over the past four years, reaching $273.3 billion as of the end of May 2026. Most of that stems from long-term leasing agreements with third-party data center operators, part of the company's push to expand its Stargate AI data center project across sites in Texas, New Mexico, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

Credit: App Economy Insights

While much of this debt remains invisible to everyday investors, institutional players and credit rating agencies are starting to take notice. Morgan Stanley and Moody's have both raised concerns about the practice, and S&P recently downgraded Oracle's short-term rating from A-2 to A-3, and its long-term rating from BBB to BBB-, placing it just one notch above junk status.

Permalink to story:

 
Meta being half a trillion in debt makes perfect sense given how much they spent in the meta verse stuff. That has got to be one of the dumbest things a big company has ever done with that much money.
 
Meta being half a trillion in debt makes perfect sense given how much they spent in the meta verse stuff. That has got to be one of the dumbest things a big company has ever done with that much money.
They thought we were ready, like in the movie Gamer.
 
Whilst I can't say that I'm the least bit surprised about these financial shenanigans, I must also admit that, as a layman on the subject, I don't understand how such "lawful" rules were ever implemented.
Looking forward to any clarification by Ed Zitron.
 
Debt is not the problem. Problem is whether they are making enough money to service the debt and still be profitable. Quietly sweeping them under the rug is just a way to inflate their PnL. The problem does not go away, it's just a temporary measure.
 
Debt is not the problem. Problem is whether they are making enough money to service the debt and still be profitable. Quietly sweeping them under the rug is just a way to inflate their PnL. The problem does not go away, it's just a temporary measure.
They'll do what always happens. They'll sell off a portion of their business with the debt attached to some other company. They'll file for bankruptcy and buy the assets back for pennies on the dollar.
 
They'll do what always happens. They'll sell off a portion of their business with the debt attached to some other company. They'll file for bankruptcy and buy the assets back for pennies on the dollar.

So NVIDIA goes bankrupt... as they don't get any money for all the hardware/assets they made?
 
So NVIDIA goes bankrupt... as they don't get any money for all the hardware/assets they made?
They're likely the only ones who won't suffer a major bankruptcy, but they are seller financing a lot of businesses that do not yet(or maybe ever) have profitable ai businesses. Cisco was one of the few companies selling hardware during the DotCom boom and it took them 26 years to recover when they were arguably the backbone of the internet in the 90s and 2000s.
 
Back