HallPass says its embarrassing AI-generated candy typos were intentional rage bait

midian182

Posts: 11,995   +183
Staff member
WTF?! When errors are discovered in products' imagery, most companies are quick to claim that AI hasn't been used in their creation. But the numerous AI-generated typos in the HallPass candy bars' promotional images weren't a mistake: they were purposely included to generate "internet rage bait," according to the firm's president.

The three low-calorie HallPass bars, which each contain 70 calories per package and just 1g of sugar, arrive on Walmart shelves nationwide on August 29. They're the work of Peter Rahal, the cofounder of David Protein and RxBar, and Michael Tierney, the founder of Stuffed Puffs.

Ahead of that launch, HallPass was unveiled to the public on Monday – and it initially appeared to be a disaster. Images of the bars' packaging featured several typos and the garbled text that's a typical sight when AI gets things wrong.

Some examples include the word "water" being used instead of "wafer," along with "suger" and "pacaage." There are also examples of words blended together so they are illegible.

As you'd expect, plenty of people jumped on the errors, calling out the need for more checks in an age where AI is used extensively for content creation. But the whole thing wasn't a colossal screw-up.

Speaking to Business Insider two days later, Tierney said the mistakes were intentional. He explained that while Hallpass did have individual images of the three bars, there were none of them all together, so AI was used to combine the images. But the final result definitely fell into the category of AI slop.

"We left them there for a little bit of internet rage bait," he said. "It's worked."

Some might wonder if the company really did miss the mistakes and then claimed they appeared in the images on purpose. In fairness, it's hard to imagine that nobody spotted some of these blunders. It also sounds like Tierney isn't hiding the fact that they intended to use AI.

The actual packaging on the finished HallPass products won't have any typos when they arrive in Walmart. It does seem like Tierney's goal of achieving "top-of-funnel awareness" for the launch has worked, but rage-bait tactics tend not to endear companies to the public.

In an example of an AI-slop promo image that wasn't intentional, outdoor gear retail giant REI Co-op pulled an Instagram photo of a bike in June that Meta had turned into a two-handlebar monstrosity.

Permalink to story:

 
It's blatantly obvious that this is a lie and they are trying to make out that it was intentional.
 
It's blatantly obvious that this is a lie and they are trying to make out that it was intentional.
You haven't heard of the saying "all press is good press"? Anyways following that logic, the more you argue the flawed use of AI was accidental, the more attention and product awareness you'll bring to HallPass.

Considering the fact that kids are the target demographic of candy makers, and kids enjoy easter eggs/quirks instead of seeing them as a bad thing, it makes sense to me. Who doesn't love playing a game where you can glitch through some things? That's part of the fun! You can argue it's something the developer failed to fix before delivering their product to market for that too.
 
You haven't heard of the saying "all press is good press"? Anyways following that logic, the more you argue the flawed use of AI was accidental, the more attention and product awareness you'll bring to HallPass.

Considering the fact that kids are the target demographic of candy makers, and kids enjoy easter eggs/quirks instead of seeing them as a bad thing, it makes sense to me. Who doesn't love playing a game where you can glitch through some things? That's part of the fun! You can argue it's something the developer failed to fix before delivering their product to market for that too.
Of course I have heard the phrase "all press is good press", it's horseh1t spouted by oily advertising executives as is the equally asinine "there's no such thing as bad publicity". Try these lines on say Prince Andrew or Donald Trump for the Epstein Files or VW for the emissions scandal or Apple for the Crush advert or OJ Simpson.. I could go on and on.
Clearly this isn't at those levels but it annoys me that it is being spun as deliberate when it is so clearly just botched.
 
Interesting approach. I guess it works for spreading the word as now I've seen it and otherwise wouldn't.
Does it actual result in more sales or do those that got baited avoid buying in even greater numbers.

If I was in charge I'd probably avoid having customers 'rage' whether it's intentional or not.
 
Back