And I will, of course. In the past, I had a model that allowed the use of third party ink.HP sells cartridge-locked printers at a loss -- a large benefit for consumers -- in order to recoup profits on consumable sales. I'm not a big fan of this model, but it is still a business model that is valid, legal, and ethical. If you don't saving money up front and paying an even larger sum later -- buy a different printer. It's called the free market.
So much buuuuuuuuuls***. That's not the university free speech problems that I was referring to, but hey, you love to give random things that make zero sense just to escape.No. Trump demanded universities follow federal law, which requires equal access to education regardless of race and gender.
"...following the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that struck down race-based affirmative action, the U.S. Department of Education and the Justice Department are investigating over 50 universities for operating race-exclusive fellowships, scholarships, and specialized training programs that bar or exclude white and Asian applicants...."
![]()
Trump administration opens investigations at over 50 universities over DEI
The colleges include major public universities such as Arizona State and Ohio State, along with prestigious private schools like Yale and Cornell.www.wdsu.com
It takes a real racist to support programs like this. And it takes a true anti-semite to criticize the DOJ investigating those schools who allowed young Jewish students to literally be chased through halls by screaming mobs without taking action:
"...Jewish students on U.S. campuses are facing an unprecedented surge in antisemitic hostility, which has manifested as verbal harassment, physical intimidation, and exclusion. Following highly disruptive protests and unauthorized encampments, data indicates that 41% of Jewish students feel the need to hide their identity. Many students report being targeted, spat on, and excluded from campus groups..."
![]()
Majority of Jewish College Students Say They Feel Less Safe Due to Encampments; 61% Report Antisemitism During Campus Protests - Hillel International
New poll from Hillel International measures Jewish student experiences as commencements begin WASHINGTON – A majority of Jewish college students feel less safe because of anti-Israel protests and encampments at their school, and report the use of antisemitic, threatening or derogatory language...www.hillel.org
But then, Leftists have always hated Jews, back to the days of Germany's National Socialism.
So you're fine with far Left radicals terrorizing young Jewish students through the halls of US campuses? Instead of condemning these anti-semitic attacks, you're condemning the response to prevent them. You want a brown shirt to wear with your Sturmabteilung manifesto?So much buuuuuuuuuls***. That's not the university free speech problems that I was referring to
I love how you are posting and bragging about points that were not implemented.You can't change history by denying it. It wasn't limited to "paramilitary schools". From the Nazis original infamous "25 point plan" (proclaimed by Adolph Hitler himself):
Point 2) "The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education ... We demand the education at the expense of the State of gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession...."
Again, why lie? From the same proclamation:
Point 7) "We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens...."
Point 15) " We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare."
These are hardly the most liberal points in Hitler's program -- the program for which millions of German liberals voted him into power. Here's a few far-Left nuggets:
Point 7. "We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelihood and way of life for the citizens."
Point 11. "We demand abolition of unearned (work and labour) incomes. Breaking of rent-slavery [division of assets]..."
Point 13. We demand the nationalization of all associated industries (trusts).
Point 14. We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.
Point 16. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate
communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms,
Point 17. "We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free
expropriation of land [and] prevention of all speculation in land...."
Socialism, pure and simple.
My favorite is Point 23, which mirrors nearly word-for-word President Biden's attempts to create an Orwellian Disinformation Governance Board, to allow the government to control what could and could not appear in media and social media:
Point 23. "We demand legal opposition to known lies and their promulgation through the press. "
Are you saying that the prosecution of the jews was related to the general gun laws that the whole world wants to see implemented in the US? Yeah, the Nazis feared and removed the guns from the hands of jews, gypsies and other minorities and gave them to nazi supporters. It's what a far right fascist regime will naturally do.So you're fine with far Left radicals terrorizing young Jewish students through the halls of US campuses? Instead of condemning these anti-semitic attacks, you're condemning the response to prevent them. You want a brown shirt to wear with your Sturmabteilung manifesto?
But please by all means, tell us how Hitler didn't "ban guns", because -- after he confiscated millions of firearms, arrested gun owners, and banned gun clubs -- he then allowed German citizens firearms again ... but only if they were good Nazi Party members, vouched for and given a permit by the local Nazi police office.
...and from their political opponents as well. Anyone who they considered an enemy of the state.Yeah, the Nazis feared and removed the guns from the hands of jews, gypsies and other minorities....
It's what the far LEFT National Socialists did. No US conservative has ever suggested removing gun rights based on politics or race. But where would the fascist Left be without their lies and disinformation, eh Herr Goebbels? Or should I say General Antonescu, instead?....and gave them to nazi supporters. It's what a far right fascist regime will naturally do.
And your point is? That history exists? Yeah, Romania had to ally with Germany at the start of the war, do you know why? Because Russia was invading us after the agreement between germany and russia. It's why the nation of Moldova exists right now, because of russia invading and taking that territory. Go read about the The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (1939) and the USSR ultimatum given to Romania in 1940....and from their political opponents as well. Anyone who they considered an enemy of the state.
It's what the far LEFT National Socialists did. No US conservative has ever suggested removing gun rights based on politics or race. But where would the fascist Left be without their lies and disinformation, eh Herr Goebbels? Or should I say General Antonescu, instead?
"...Romania allied with Nazi Germany during WW2. Led by fascist General Ion Antonescu, Romania was a major Axis contributor. It provided vital oil supplies and sent hundreds of thousands of troops to the Eastern Front...."
Nazis yesterday, child traffickers today: Romania has quite the reputation. But hey, at least you've stopped the lie that "Hitler never banned guns".
Utterly disgusting. No one "had to ally" with the Nazis and assist them in haulling off hundreds of thousands of innocent Romanian Jews to gas chambers and other execution pits. The mere fact you justify this speaks volumes.And your point is? That history exists? Yeah, Romania had to ally with Germany at the start of the war, do you know why?
Yet Romania today continues to backslide into the same fascist rhetoric and acts.FYI it is literally illegal in Romania to publicly support Antonescu and the fascists from that time period
It is the public record of what the Nazis stood for and why German Leftists overthrew the conservative Weimer Republic to install into power the Left-Wing National Socialists.And I know you'll copy paste that 25-point nazi propaganda everywhere
Not just from Jews and Gypsies, but from their political opponents and anyone the Nazis considered "enemies of the state". And this is what far LEFT regimes do, and advocate for today. No US conservative has ever -- ever -- attempted to ban guns based on racial or political motives.Yeah, the Nazis feared and removed the guns from the hands of jews, gypsies and other minorities and gave them to nazi supporters. It's what a far right fascist regime will naturally do.
"It is the public record of what the Nazis stood for" = "I believe in nazi election propaganda, not historical facts of what the Nazis did."Utterly disgusting. No one "had to ally" with the Nazis and assist them in haulling off hundreds of thousands of innocent Romanian Jews to gas chambers and other execution pits. The mere fact you justify this speaks volumes.
Yet Romania today continues to backslide into the same fascist rhetoric and acts.
It is the public record of what the Nazis stood for and why German Leftists overthrew the conservative Weimer Republic to install into power the Left-Wing National Socialists.
I admitted nothing, I simply proved you wrong with some of the points you keep copy pasting being 100% false and the rest taken completely out of context and twisted, but you keep mentioning them as if they happened as written in a freaking campaign flyer.Not just from Jews and Gypsies, but from their political opponents and anyone the Nazis considered "enemies of the state". And this is what far LEFT regimes do, and advocate for today. No US conservative has ever -- ever -- attempted to ban guns based on racial or political motives.
Also, I notice you've de-facto admitted your earlier errors when you claimed the Nazis "never banned guns". It's progress -- of sorts.
You proved yourself wrong. First you claimed the Nazis "never banned guns", only to finally admit they did. But -- despite every liberal group on the planet today clamoring to do exactly what the Nazis did -- you're still pretending gun banning is "right wing".I admitted nothing, I simply proved you wrong
These are historical facts of not only what the Nazis stood for, but what they actually did. They banned guns, they vastly increased the power of the federal government, they took control of big business and enacted high progressive taxes on the wealthy. All LIBERAL ideals. As for their expansion of welfare:"It is the public record of what the Nazis stood for" = "I believe in nazi election propaganda, not historical facts of what the Nazis did."
“The Nazis […] saw comprehensive social benefits and principles of national solidarity as distinguishing National Socialism from the practice [of] capitalist nations.”
I love it when you talk about historical facts and ten go on to ignore historical facts. It's freakign insane to see maga be this ignorant or intentionally blind simply because they don't want trump be associated with fascists.These are historical facts of not only what the Nazis stood for, but what they actually did. They banned guns, they vastly increased the power of the federal government, they took control of big business and enacted high progressive taxes on the wealthy. All LIBERAL ideals. As for their expansion of welfare:
"Yes, the Nazis significantly expanded the social safety net. They built a massive welfare infrastructure under the concept of the Volksgemeinschaft (people's community) to foster national unity...."
And:
"Similar socialistic developments, influenced by the policies of National Socialist (Nazi) Germany, took place elsewhere in Europe. As Pope states:
...That is why the Nazis sought to replace the Bismarckian model of earnings-related, pensions with a system of universal flat-rate benefits. In a 1939 speech, Hitler claimed that Britain opposed his regime due to their aversion to “[T]he Germany which sets a dangerous example to them … the Germany of social welfare, of social equality, of the elimination of class differences—this is what they fear...."
Except I haven't. In fact, I've repeatedly stated these facts so many times that we've actually made progress in your case. You no longer claim "The Nazis never banned guns". Instead, you admit they did -- but (weirdly enough) pretend this is a "right wing philosophy". You never claim the Nazis didn't publicly espouse a virulently Left-wing agenda or that "Leftists didn't vote the Nazis into power", but now admit all this to be true, but merely brush it aside with "the Nazis were just pretending to be Leftists" and "their supporters were fooled with empty promises"I love it when you talk about historical facts and ten go on to ignore historical facts.
You are simply talking about propaganda, this was established multiple times. Just because you don't believe so doesn't mean you should insult all historian sand all history boos. It's pathetic.Except I haven't. In fact, I've repeatedly stated these facts so many times that we've actually made progress in your case. You no longer claim "The Nazis never banned guns". Instead, you admit they did -- but (weirdly enough) pretend this is a "right wing philosophy". You never claim the Nazis didn't publicly espouse a virulently Left-wing agenda or that "Leftists didn't vote the Nazis into power", but now admit all this to be true, but merely brush it aside with "the Nazis were just pretending to be Leftists" and "their supporters were fooled with empty promises"
It's progress. Slow, but progress.