captaincranky said:
The above comments are quite ridiculous because they don't know what they're talking about.
If you were Indian you would knew quite well why this happened & you could care less about it.
I think I know why this happened! It's to keep up the "productivity" of "customer service" and "telephone sales" agents, by preventing them from surfing porn during their 12 hour workday!
I suspect the only thing they'll be allowed to have at "phoneside", is a dictionary of "Common English Given Names". That way, they'll be able change their "nom de plume" away from something like, "Biff", "Drake", or "Cinderella", when it isn't working for them.
With porn available to these employees, they might be either tempted to, or preoccupied enough, to adopt a porn name by accident.
I mean God knows, we can't have, "Miles Long" or "Lotta Goo" calling the president of the PTA, now can we?