It may temper your thoughts on the A770 when one releases that, in terms of hardware specifications and theoretical performance figures only, Intel's card should be competing at the top of the list of the cards in the review.
It's not a small chip -- at 21.7 billion transistors, it's around 25% larger than the GA104 (3070 Ti) and Navi 22 (6700 XT); it has more TMUs and ROPs than any of the others, and the same memory bandwidth as the 6800 XT. Yes it doesn't have anything like Infinity Cache, but it does have 5.85 of L1 and 16MB of L2 cache -- the latter is four times more than the GA104 (former is a tiny bit more).
The Xe cores can handle concurrent FP/INT threads, just like the others; each render slice (four Xe cores) has its own dedicated thread management engine, triangle setup unit, rasterizer, and z buffer processor. The A770 only has 4 render slices (roughly equivalent to Nvidia's GPCs, where the GA104 has 6 of them) so it's possibly a little lacking in the above aspects.
But even so, it shouldn't be as bad as this.
Am disappoint.
It's not a small chip -- at 21.7 billion transistors, it's around 25% larger than the GA104 (3070 Ti) and Navi 22 (6700 XT); it has more TMUs and ROPs than any of the others, and the same memory bandwidth as the 6800 XT. Yes it doesn't have anything like Infinity Cache, but it does have 5.85 of L1 and 16MB of L2 cache -- the latter is four times more than the GA104 (former is a tiny bit more).
The Xe cores can handle concurrent FP/INT threads, just like the others; each render slice (four Xe cores) has its own dedicated thread management engine, triangle setup unit, rasterizer, and z buffer processor. The A770 only has 4 render slices (roughly equivalent to Nvidia's GPCs, where the GA104 has 6 of them) so it's possibly a little lacking in the above aspects.
But even so, it shouldn't be as bad as this.
Am disappoint.