Intel Clearwater Forest: 288-core all-E-core Xeon CPU debuts on 18A process

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,972   +58
Staff
What just happened? Intel used this year's Hot Chips conference in Cupertino to showcase a redesign of its flagship data center CPUs, unveiling its first all-E-core Xeon called Clearwater Forest. The processor, expected to ship in 2026, stands out for its unprecedented scale: 288 efficiency cores per socket, support for dual-socket systems that total 576 cores, and more than 1,152 megabytes of combined last-level cache.

The announcement marks a turning point in Intel's server roadmap. Rather than chasing raw single-thread performance, Clearwater Forest is aimed at high-density, scale-out workloads where throughput and power efficiency decide real-world performance.

Clearwater Forest is the successor to the recently launched 144-core Xeon Sierra Forest, but it relies on a new generation of E-cores known as Darkmont. Intel says the updated design provides roughly 17 percent higher instructions-per-cycle compared to the previous Crestmont E-cores. The gains come from a wider 3x3 instruction decode engine, deeper out-of-order windows, and broader execution units.

Each group of four cores shares 4 megabytes of L2 cache, and total bandwidth has doubled over Sierra Forest to approximately 400 GB per second. Taken together, Intel is positioning Clearwater Forest as a throughput-focused processor for tasks such as web services and AI inference.

The chip is manufactured on Intel's long-awaited 18A node, which introduces RibbonFET transistors alongside backside power delivery. Those design changes are intended to address efficiency and voltage drop challenges while allowing higher density. For Intel, which has struggled to keep up with TSMC's process advances, Clearwater Forest is one of the first large-scale demonstrations of its planned manufacturing comeback.

Unlike prior Xeon generations, Clearwater Forest adopts a chiplet configuration to reach its core count. The CPU combines 12 compute chiplets on Intel 18A with three base tiles fabricated on Intel 3 and two I/O chiplets built on Intel 7. The components are tied together using the company's Foveros Direct 3D stacking and EMIB interconnect technologies.

This modular approach reduces the cost and complexity compared with a massive monolithic die, while an internal mesh fabric links compute and memory resources across the package. Each processor includes a 12-channel DDR5 memory controller, supports DDR5-8000 memory speeds, and provides 96 lanes of PCIe 5.0 connectivity. In dual-socket systems, this expands to 24 memory channels across 576 cores.

Intel has also confirmed that Clearwater Forest will work with the Xeon 9600E platform.

Clearwater Forest enters the market alongside AMD's Epyc Bergamo, a 128-core processor based on Zen 4c cores. While AMD's design emphasizes higher per-core performance, simultaneous multithreading, and wider vector capabilities, Intel has chosen to prioritize raw scale. A two-socket Clearwater Forest configuration can theoretically support more than 1,000 virtual CPUs per server rack.

Performance-per-watt is another target. Intel claims Clearwater Forest will deliver about 3.5 times better efficiency than its prior-generation Xeons. If validated in practice, that metric could help offset the competitive advantage AMD has gained in hyperscale and cloud markets.

Manufactured entirely in the United States, Clearwater Forest is also being positioned as proof of Intel's strategy to reestablish domestic foundry leadership and reclaim market share lost to competitors. Whether the new design reshapes Xeon's place in data centers will become clearer when systems reach customers in 2026.

Permalink to story:

 
Intel knows they cannot compete with AMD high performance designs. So they decide to compete against gazillion ARM based server chips that have crapload of cores. Good luck.
 
What is it with this author and AMD???? First, B650 and B850 motherboards won't allow overclocking, and now, Intel Clearwater is up against Bergamo????

Has this guy ever seen much less used ANY AMD systems? How about maybe reading up on them before writing these Intel puff pieces.

Clearwater is up against the 192 core Turin Zen 5c Epyc processors, NOT Bergamo.

And next year, while this thing is still out there, It will have to deal with Venice, with 256 Zen 6c cores.

It may or may not sip power, but it will almost surely get waxed by Venice.
 
Intel is choosing a less competitive market to gain control of as they have slipped in other chip areas due to quality competition. Their guess that AI processing and Cloud processing is the main consumer of technology is sharp. This market will likely produce consistent revenue because the demand is high and supply low, any competitive chip will become viable when price hikes and shipping delays become a limiting factor for cloud companies. Hopefully the product lives up to its claims and the name Intel gains momentum allowing other products to then become more popular.
 
Intel is choosing a less competitive market to gain control of as they have slipped in other chip areas due to quality competition. Their guess that AI processing and Cloud processing is the main consumer of technology is sharp. This market will likely produce consistent revenue because the demand is high and supply low, any competitive chip will become viable when price hikes and shipping delays become a limiting factor for cloud companies. Hopefully the product lives up to its claims and the name Intel gains momentum allowing other products to then become more popular.

Yes, what you say could work to an extent, but then, Intel would have to release these processors at reasonable prices at launch. To date, I haven't seen Intel release anything at prices close to reasonable, much less commensurate with their performance. Don't get me wrong, Intel almost always sees the light and slashes prices, but also waits until after the ship has sailed to do it.

Worst part is, that the last round of price slashing on Xeon CPUs shows, is that AMD is now in a financial position to cut prices right with them.

All I can say is grab the popcorn, this should be interesting.
 
Intel is choosing a less competitive market to gain control of as they have slipped in other chip areas due to quality competition. Their guess that AI processing and Cloud processing is the main consumer of technology is sharp. This market will likely produce consistent revenue because the demand is high and supply low, any competitive chip will become viable when price hikes and shipping delays become a limiting factor for cloud companies. Hopefully the product lives up to its claims and the name Intel gains momentum allowing other products to then become more popular.
They would need an attractive product to gain momentum. The fact that AMD forced intel to cut xeon price after grabbing a record amount of server revenue says it all.
 
Back