1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

Intel gives update on Larrabee discrete graphics: still dead

By Jos
May 26, 2010
  1. For the last three years or so Intel had been working on an x86-derived graphics chip, dubbed Larrabee, that would supposedly shake up the discrete GPU market. After holding several demos, which unfortunately were far from being competitive, plans to market a consumer version of Larrabee were indefinitely put on hold last December, opting instead to release it as a software development platform for both graphic and high performance computing.

    Read the whole story
  2. princeton

    princeton TS Addict Posts: 1,674

    "Intel believes HD video and mobile computing are the most important areas to focus on moving forward when it comes to its graphics business. "

    Well they're *****s. Do they know how much more money they would bring in if they focused on their graphics solutions competing with ati and nvidia? Obviously not. Maybe its a good thing as them keeping their focus on cpu's is most likely a good thing. Focusing on sandy bridge is probably for the best. And slightly off topic. AMD should better get off their ****ing asses and start being competitive. Intel is dominating right now. AMD's 6 core is competing with the I5. This market has gone really weird. So little competition. AMD is behind with cpus but years ago they were dominating and nvidia is falling behind but they were previously dominating.
  3. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,840   +1,267

    Since Intel only have 43.5% of the graphics market, yes, maybe they need to push just a little harder. While most of that share is from IGP based solutions (i.e. performance on par with this...) Intel probably figure that the majority of PC owners probably don't game at mainstream/enthusiast levels- a view seemingly backed up by this.
    Add in a whole new extremely large (and mostly untapped) burgeoning market in handhelds, tablets, netbooks, smartphones ebook readers, digital tv, connected picture frames and home gateways (i.e multiple processors per potential customer), where ARM licensees including Qualcomm's Snapdragon, nVidia's Tegra2 and TI's OMAP are poised to cash in at Intel's expense and I can see how Intel might want to channel R&D funding to those areas at the expense of high-end graphics.
    There is also the not-insignificant stumbling block that designing a successful graphics architecture is damn hard work. A fact seemingly born out by the entire market dominated by just two players.
    Given that Intel posted a CLEAN PROFIT of $US 2.4 billion for the first three months of this year, I would say that 1. Intel has fairly good vision when it comes to accumulation of revenue, and 2. I'd be quite happy if they didn't accumulate too much more market share.
    Sandy Bridge is a done deal, Intel are busy at work on it's replacements (Ivy Bridge - a die shrink from 32nm to 22nm, and probably the series after that, Haswell)
    Unfortunately that requires significant R&D resources-Something in short supply at AMD, a few eureka moments from the design people and a change in public perception from that of AMD as Intel's ***** stepbrother.
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...