Intel may have cancelled Meteor Lake desktop CPUs in favor of a Raptor Lake refresh

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,363   +43
Staff
Rumor mill: Rumors over the last year have painted a tumultuous picture of the development of Intel's 14th-generation Meteor Lake processors. The latest information takes things a step further regarding Intel's struggles to transition from its current CPU architecture suggesting the company has canceled Meteor Lake's desktop variants. The upcoming series might be struggling to match, much less exceed, Raptor Lake's clock rates.

November rumors stated Intel wasn't planning to release any Meteor Lake CPUs in 2023. Instead, the company would fill the 2023 product slot with a refresh of its latest Raptor Lake line with modest performance improvements. Meteor Lake would debut as a series of laptop CPUs in 2024 along with the 15th-generation Arrow Lake desktop processors, with a Meteor Lake desktop series to possibly follow.

However, trusted leaker @OneRaichu said this week that there may never be Meteor Lake desktop processors. The 14th-generation CPUs are supposed to mark Intel's transition to tile-based architecture, which is similar to the "chiplet" design AMD uses for its recent processors, but Intel might be struggling to maintain desktop-class performance amid the shift.

A piece of good news, however, is that Intel confirms Meteor Lake will support hardware AV1 encoding. The company's Arc Alchemist dedicated GPUs were the first to feature hardware AV1 encoding, while AMD's RDNA3 and Nvidia's Ada Lovelace GPUs quickly followed. CPUs have encoded AV1 through software for a little while, but only the latest GPUs can perform the task through hardware.

The new format allows more efficient compression than VP9 or H.264, but unlike H.265 it's also royalty-free. AV1 will help companies and individuals produce clearer video content more cheaply and efficiently. Currently, it requires relatively recent hardware to encode or decode, but support for the format is rapidly expanding.

Meteor Lake is supposed to combine the Intel 4 process node on its compute tile with TSMC's 3nm node on the GPU tile. The series may also feature integrated GPUs that support ray tracing based on Arc Alchemist's ray tracing capabilities.

Furthermore, the 14th-generation CPUs are expected to shift to a new socket. Raichu speculates that it may support three generations of processors like LGA 1700, which supported Intel's 11th, 12th, and 13th-generation CPUs.

Permalink to story.

 
What's wrong with software decoding of AV1? It takes <2% of CPU power if even that. It's not like we are running 2 core CPUs on ddr1 PCs.
 
Youtube is going to RE-EN-code it anyway after upload and it's going to take time. Out of streaming platforms, like YouTube that IS pushing AV1, AV1 isn't really that exciting.
 
Youtube is going to RE-EN-code it anyway after upload and it's going to take time. Out of streaming platforms, like YouTube that IS pushing AV1, AV1 isn't really that exciting.

"The new format allows more efficient compression than VP9 or H.264, but unlike H.265 it's also royalty-free. "

Emphasis on ROYALTY-FREE.
 
"The new format allows more efficient compression than VP9 or H.264, but unlike H.265 it's also royalty-free. "

Emphasis on ROYALTY-FREE.
I have never payed a dime for any royalty and have uploaded over 100 videos (over 20 in 4K 60fps) on YT. I don't see the point of this?! Compression on my end is always tens of times faster than what it takes internally on youtube. It doesn't matter if I render the final video in 5 seconds or 50 minutes, YT is going to take over 3-4 hours to finish it's "thing". So, compression is efficient on my end. If youtube needs this hardware - great! They should then buy whatever hardware they need. I don't need it.
PS. H265 is not a format YT uses. It's AV1, H.264 and AV1 (recently) IF you are uploading a 4K video (not if you are uploading only 1080p or smaller, then it's back to h.264 in mp4 container)
 
Youtube is going to RE-EN-code it anyway after upload and it's going to take time. Out of streaming platforms, like YouTube that IS pushing AV1, AV1 isn't really that exciting.
Actually it IS exciting to see high quality video at such low bitrates when encoded into AV1.
Using Handbrake Nightly, HQ AV1 preset, 15 fps encoding on Ryzen 3600 is not bad too.
 
Back