Intel's leaked 28-core Nova Lake CPU beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X3D in single-thread testing

midian182

Posts: 12,020   +183
Staff member
Highly anticipated: What appears to be another leak of Intel's upcoming Nova Lake-S desktop processors has hit the internet. A PassMark benchmark lists results for a 28-core chip, and its single-thread score is higher than that of the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X3D.

A VideoCardz reader found the entries through PerformanceTest 11.1's Manage Baselines feature. Listed as "Intel 0000," the processors appear in submissions dating back to September.

The fastest 28-core result reaches 5,210 points in the single-thread test, with another scoring 5,191. For comparison, the individual baselines selected by VideoCardz scored 5,059 for the Core Ultra 9 285K, 4,805 for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D, and 4,635 for the Core i9-14900KF. That gives the Nova Lake-S sample leads of around 3%, 8.4%, and 12.4%, respectively. The publication selected comparison systems whose overall CPU Mark results were close to the processors' published averages.

The overall CPU Mark result is less impressive: 61,509 points against 67,274 for the 285K and 72,066 for the 9950X3D. It still beats the 14900KF's 58,074, though. Separately, the eight-core entries score between 9,004 and 23,478 points, a wide spread that could reflect differences in test conditions or development configurations.

The highest Memory Mark score shown is 2,523.4, around 25% below the selected 285K system's 3,349.6. These are system-level results, so the gap can't be attributed to the processor alone.

The screenshot lists approximately 16GB of RAM, a reported CPU speed of roughly 3.3GHz, and turbo readings near 4.8GHz for both 28-core entries.

The eight-core entries, listed as using an embedded platform, top out at 5,085 single-thread points. The fastest result narrowly exceeds the Core Ultra 9 285K baseline of 5,059, a lead of about 0.5%.

It's important to remember that these are unverified results from unidentified pre-release samples. Unknown test conditions and unfinished hardware or firmware mean they may not reflect retail performance.

Earlier this month, a lineup leak listed a Core Ultra 9 4970K BFC with eight performance cores, 16 efficiency cores, and four low-power efficiency cores. The leak listed a 125W TDP and integrated graphics with 32 execution units. BFC appears to identify the large-cache models – the acronym likely took inspiration from the iconic Doom weapon.

The standard 4950K reportedly retains that 28-core configuration without the big cache. Its original table omitted the four LP-E cores, which leaker Jaykihn said also feature in standard models. The benchmark entries don't identify a retail model or establish whether the tested chip carries the additional cache.

Further down the leaked stack, the 65W Core Ultra 9 4900 BFC combines 6P+12E+4LP-E cores, while the 125W Core Ultra 7 4870K BFC uses 8P+12E+4LP-E. Both list 32-EU graphics. The 125W Core Ultra 5 4650K and 4650KF list 6P+12E cores before adding the reported LP-E quartet; the KF drops integrated graphics.

Model Cores (P+E+LP-E) Big cache TDP iGPU
Core Ultra 9 4970K BFC 8+16+4 Yes 125W 32 EU
Core Ultra 9 4950K 8+16 No 125W 32 EU
Core Ultra 9 4900 BFC 6+12+4 Yes 65W 32 EU
Core Ultra 7 4870K BFC 8+12+4 Yes 125W 32 EU
Core Ultra 7 4850K 8+12 No 125W 32 EU
Core Ultra 5 4650K 6+12 No 125W 32 EU
Core Ultra 5 4650KF 6+12 No 125W None

The family is expected to require LGA 1954 motherboards and 900-series chipsets, while larger configurations with up to 52 cores are tipped to arrive later.

Permalink to story:

 
I'll wait for Techspot review before getting happy. X3D chips has always been slower in Single threaded performance, but faster in games. So not sure how much Single threaded performance matter anymore.

Will wait and see if Intel BFC delivers.
 
I have a 285k with 5090 and 64GB DDR5. I don't see prices getting any better - anytime soon for PC hardware. I'll check back in 10 years before upgrading.
 
"Intel's leaked 28-core Nova Lake CPU beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X3D in single-thread testing"

the ryzen 9 has 2 CCD, everybody with 2 braincells knows nothing beats 1 CCD with one massive cache, AKA

the KING 9800X3D !

Next time put a better title.
 
"Intel's leaked 28-core Nova Lake CPU beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X3D in single-thread testing"

the ryzen 9 has 2 CCD, everybody with 2 braincells knows nothing beats 1 CCD with one massive cache, AKA

the KING 9800X3D !

Next time put a better title.

Technically, an infinitely fast single-core CPU will always win out :/
 
If this had happened ages ago I'd be like:
Hooray competition, prices are gonna go down, stock is gonna up.

Now it's more of a, cool I guess.
PC hardware sales are massively down (as is my interest) and prices are massively up on everything, even if CPU prices go down by a little bit.. it doesn't exactly offset storage, RAM or GPU prices.

Good for Intel though, hope it holds up in third party testing and it isn't Intel doing Intel dubious things again.
 
Oh great, Intel went from bifurcating the cores to trifurcating.

We have a Performance Core, an Efficiency Core, and a Low-Power Efficiency Core, quick Intel add a 4th and 5th, we need a Low-Power High Efficiency core, and we need Low-Power Low-Heat Efficiency Core!
 
So, is the BFC on top of a die with the 4 EP cores? Because only the BFC SKUs have the 4 EP cores. I’m still rooting for a 8 core, BFC chip, it’ll never happen, but here’s hoping.
 
Neh..I’ll wait for 10800X3D with 12 cores on a single die..or whatever they’ll call it. It will work on my current platform - so the upgrade will be fairly large without having to swap out my motherboard / memory
 
Back