MacBook Neo teardown reveals Apple's most repair-friendly laptop in years

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,012   +59
Staff
Bottom line: Apple's push into cheaper laptops is also reshaping how its hardware gets fixed. In the MacBook Neo, a stripped-down internal design, modular components, and lower service fees come together in a way that makes repairs both technically simpler and significantly less expensive than on Apple's other notebooks, a notable shift for anyone used to paying top-case prices for relatively minor damage.

Unlike recent MacBook Air and Pro models, where Apple's unibody "top case" design turns keyboard problems into major surgery, the Neo's keyboard is treated as its own part rather than being permanently bundled with the upper shell.

Apple's newly published service manual spells out separate procedures and part listings for a standalone keyboard, a keyboard with Touch ID, and the top case itself, so a failed key mechanism no longer automatically drives a full chassis swap. That is a substantial departure from past systems in which the keyboard was riveted or deeply integrated into the case and typically replaced only as part of a multi-hundred-dollar assembly; a design that helped turn the butterfly keyboard failures of the late 2010s into costly warranty events.

A teardown of the Neo by YouTuber Tech Re-Nu shows how far Apple has gone to simplify the rest of the machine. The Australian repair channel fully opens the aluminum chassis by removing eight Torx screws on the underside, exposing a compact logic board and a notably clean internal layout with no hinge covers or dense layering of parts.

In the video, the host tears down most major components in about six minutes using only T3, T5, and T8 Torx drivers, an unusually quick process for a Mac laptop.

The battery assembly is where the design diverges most sharply from recent MacBooks. In the Neo, the battery is held in place by 18 screws and lifts straight out once surrounding shields and flex cables are moved aside, with no stretch-release tabs and no structural adhesive bonding it to the chassis.

Tech Re-Nu reports encountering no tape anywhere in the disassembly and notes that the only adhesive in the machine appears under a trackpad cable, a first for a modern MacBook and a clear contrast with the multi-cell, glue-backed packs used in ultra-thin models like the MacBook Air.

Peripheral hardware inside the Neo is likewise designed to be replaced piece by piece. Both USB-C ports are modular rather than permanently fixed to the logic board, so a damaged connector does not automatically require a motherboard swap.

The speakers and the 3.5 mm headphone jack are also discrete modules that come out after removing a few screws, and again, no adhesive, making routine failures or accidental damage more manageable for independent shops and in-house IT teams.

This hardware approach aligns with a pricing structure that further distinguishes the Neo from the rest of Apple's laptop line. According to Apple's current repair pricing, an out-of-warranty battery replacement on the Neo is set at $149 in the United States, compared with $199 for the MacBook Air and $229 for MacBook Pro models, despite those machines sitting higher in the lineup.

For customers with AppleCare+, Apple says accidental screen or external enclosure damage will incur a $49 service fee on the Neo, about half the $99 charge applied to comparable incidents on current Air and Pro configurations.

The Neo sits in a broader pattern of incremental changes Apple has made to improve day-to-day repairability on its devices. Recent iPhones have moved toward easier battery and display swaps, using pull tabs and other design tweaks that reduce the need for heat and solvents when removing large components.

In laptops where Apple still prioritizes maximum battery density and minimal thickness – particularly the MacBook Air and the higher-end Pro systems – adhesive-backed cells and tightly packed internals are likely to remain, but the Neo shows how far the company is willing to go in a design that targets cost-conscious buyers.

Tech Re-Nu's partial teardown does not map every step required to remove the Neo's individually replaceable keyboard, but Apple's own documentation confirms that the process, while still involving dozens of screws, avoids the full top-case replacement that has dominated Mac laptop keyboard repairs for more than a decade.

Taken together – the modular ports and audio hardware, screw-secured battery, discrete keyboard, and lower service fees – the MacBook Neo emerges as an outlier in Apple's lineup, and one of the most repair-friendly Macs the company has shipped in recent years.

Permalink to story:

 
I have thought recently about looking at Apple, Never had one before but this little laptop might just get me to take a more serious look. Now we find it's not bad to repair and it seems like a good option. I would only want to browse, play movies and code. So nothing heavy.
 
I have thought recently about looking at Apple, Never had one before but this little laptop might just get me to take a more serious look. Now we find it's not bad to repair and it seems like a good option. I would only want to browse, play movies and code. So nothing heavy.
Mine arrived yesterday, if that's what you plan to do with it, you won't find a better laptop for the money, it's honestly awesome for it's price range.

It's my first Mac as well, they've always been too expensive for my blood for what I needed it for, but this thing? For a laptop that I want to use for browsing the web, writing up emails, editing documents, some light photo and video editing, A bit of Discord, just general things, it's absolutely brilliant.

Good luck Microsoft, Windows and OEM's, I don't think I've ever seen a £600 Windows machine made out of anything other than cheap plastic, let alone a CPU that's even a quarter as capable as that A18 Pro.

Oh, and since it's new and I'm testing it's limits, Cyberpunk runs but it's not ideal, easier games though, Heroes of the Storm or Valheim, happily play at 60fps, I'm currently downloading World of Warcraft to test, Baldur's Gate 3 is another I'll test as well, but overall, it plays games WAY better than you'd expect, it's not what I wanted it for, but I'm suprised how well it does.
 
Apple finally did something really right


What did they do right? Not glue down stuff? Where is the removal drive in-case of data recovery? They use a USB c port for USB 2.0 LOL. Hey atleast there is not glue or serialized parts I give them that.
 
Apple discovering screws again feels like the most surprising plot twist of 2026. Somewhere an iFixit engineer just shed a single tear of joy.
 
What did they do right? Not glue down stuff?
You know, there's this cool article above that talks about all the things they did right. Might want to give it a read.
Where is the removal drive in-case of data recovery?
This DOES suck, but not having a backup solution in place for your files is incredibly stupid. Apple practically begs you to set up cloud backups for documents.
They use a USB c port for USB 2.0 LOL. Hey atleast there is not glue or serialized parts I give them that.
The A18 only has 1 3.0 and 1 2.0 connection available. This is supposed to be a cheap budget laptop.
Apple discovering screws again feels like the most surprising plot twist of 2026. Somewhere an iFixit engineer just shed a single tear of joy.
You might even say having an engineer as CEO is already paying dividends and it hasnt been a year yet.
I can report back, WoW runs EASILY, in the default state, the GPU is barely being worked, you can actually crank some settings up and it still holds 60fps and never dipped in the 30 minutes or so I played.
Can you install Wine and play around with some older windows games? I'm curious what the compatibility landscape looks like, but the $300 mac minis I was looking at all disappeared.
 
Sure, any games you wanted me to try in-particular? I was going to see if I can get Half-Life 2 to run.
If you have any of these:

sins of a solar empire rebellion
star wars empire at war
star wars battlefront 2
tropico 4
any of the older total wars
civ V
deep rock galactic

That would be great! Or anything old you might have. It's surprisingly hard to find people testing anything from before 2015. I know it all runs fine in Proton, but on mac you have to choose between using crossover or parallel or some other tool.
 
This DOES suck, but not having a backup solution in place for your files is incredibly stupid. Apple practically begs you to set up cloud backups for documents.

macOS has Time Machine for local backups. Been using it for years. All you need is an external storage device and you're good to go. No need to fork out heaps for cloud storage, although I do use iCloud to access files and family photos across multiple devices for only a couple bucks per month.
 
Last edited:
I can report back, WoW runs EASILY, in the default state, the GPU is barely being worked, you can actually crank some settings up and it still holds 60fps and never dipped in the 30 minutes or so I played.

Thank you, I think you just persuaded me.

EDIT: Got one on the way, Went for the 512gb storage in yellow, Me and the Mrs will use it and see if we might move away from Windows onto Apple.
 
Last edited:
If you have any of these:

sins of a solar empire rebellion
star wars empire at war
star wars battlefront 2
tropico 4
any of the older total wars
civ V
deep rock galactic

That would be great! Or anything old you might have. It's surprisingly hard to find people testing anything from before 2015. I know it all runs fine in Proton, but on mac you have to choose between using crossover or parallel or some other tool.
So here's a list of games I've tried and their status, I've used CrossOver for the translation layer which is an absolute doddle to get working, or used the native Mac version if available:

Star Wars Battlefront 2 (original) - Plays perfectly, 60fps, no issues, played this for a little while, forgot how good this game is.
Tropico 4 - Plays well, hitting 60fps, has similar stuttering issues as Deep Rock Galactic but these do seem to go away the longer you play.
Deep Rock Galactic - Plays well, hitting 30fps+, it does have a stuttering issue for a little while, it's shader cache stutter, but once this is done it runs fine.
Bioshock (original) - Opens, Audio totally broken, Extremely unstable, you can be at 0fps for 10 seconds, then suddenly at 30fps+, but it won't last long until you're in a massive freeze again, unplayable.
Mass Effect (original) - Plays poorly, 10-30fps, it looks fine, changing resolution doesn't affect performance, it seems the texture quality, the lower the better, but even then, it just wouldn't run nicely. No graphical glitches or anything, probably just needs more VRAM.
Call of Duty 2 - Doesn't work, game loads, the military channel videos play before the level loads, but you never make it in-game, it just freezes.
Spore - Doesn't work, fails to load at all.
Half-Life 2 - Plays perfectly, 60fps, has some tiny little stutters which seem to be shader cache related e.g. lightning effect for the first time causes a tiny stutter but then never stutters again.
World of Warcraft - Works natively, plays perfectly, 60fps, no issues
Heroes of the Storm - Works natively, plays perfectly, 60fps, no issues
Cyberpunk 2077 - Works natively, but performance is not ideal, 30-40fps, playable, sure, but not ideal, still impressive it's playable at all.
Unreal Tournament 2004 - Plays well, 60fps+, the only problem I have is a stutter every second, I think this is v-sync related, or lack there of, probably fixable from a quick Google.
Baldur's Gate 3 - Works natively, plays well, 30fps, I didn't use any upscaling so there's definitely room for improvement, very playable though.

The battery has now finally reached 10% left, so going to leave it there.

Edit: just want to say, CrossOver claims some of the games above do work, Spore for example, shows as "runs well", yet I couldn't get it to start at all. So that might be some of the limitation of running on the Neo at the moment.
 
Last edited:
What did they do right? Not glue down stuff? Where is the removal drive in-case of data recovery? They use a USB c port for USB 2.0 LOL. Hey atleast there is not glue or serialized parts I give them that.
Ahhhh, here it is...first post too.
You all complain about the MacBook Pros, Airs, Minis and iPads, and the pricing etc...now, you still complain about a laptop they make cheap for the masses.

Why don't you buy one...actually use it, then come back and complain about everything they did wrong.

They did make one that you can afford now...give it a try, you might like it. Or stay on the W11 mess and keep complaining.
 
Ahhhh, here it is...first post too.
You all complain about the MacBook Pros, Airs, Minis and iPads, and the pricing etc...now, you still complain about a laptop they make cheap for the masses.

Why don't you buy one...actually use it, then come back and complain about everything they did wrong.

They did make one that you can afford now...give it a try, you might like it. Or stay on the W11 mess and keep complaining.
Criticizing someone for their first post when they really do have a good point here, very welcoming LOL.

Everyone seems to be overhyping the heck out of this phone powered laptop which in reality isn't any more repairable than other laptops, Apple won't let you replace the SSD or RAM in it, or sell you new parts without having to jump through the "authorized repair" hoops of having to pair new parts to their devices which hampers the average person from actually fixing things.

I don't have to own any Apple devices to realize what the shortcomings are, once you look past the hype and PR for this laptop the drawbacks are very obvious.
 
Criticizing someone for their first post when they really do have a good point here, very welcoming LOL.

Everyone seems to be overhyping the heck out of this phone powered laptop which in reality isn't any more repairable than other laptops, Apple won't let you replace the SSD or RAM in it, or sell you new parts without having to jump through the "authorized repair" hoops of having to pair new parts to their devices which hampers the average person from actually fixing things.

I don't have to own any Apple devices to realize what the shortcomings are, once you look past the hype and PR for this laptop the drawbacks are very obvious.
It's being hyped up because it blows every single Windows powered laptop out of the water at this price point. All of them, every single one.

Don't come back to me with "second hand laptops", we're not talking second hand here, we're talking about competing brand new laptops.

Anything made by a Microsoft OEM is made of plastic at this price point, all of them have much weaker processors, all of them have a quarter of the battery life, all of them have much lower quality screens, speakers, keyboards and touchpads.

Granted, these Windows laptops have removable SSD's and their RAM can usually be upgraded, that is a weak point of the MacBook, Whilst I won't defend the SSD being non-removable, no manufacturer has any excuse for that.

The RAM though, this little phone processor is so efficient, the whole laptop sips between 3-4 watts when I'm here browsing the web using firefox with 5-6 tabs open, if I do that on my work laptop (Lenovo Thinkpad E14 Gen6) it's sipping 17-20 watts, no wonder why the Neo gets four times the battery life. Packaging the RAM onto the die clearly has performance and power benefits, I wish I could upgrade the RAM, but I also went into this knowing I couldn't and not expecting the laptop to be anywhere near as capable as it actually is.

Again, this is my first MacBook, my first foray into MacOS, All I wanted a laptop for was browsing the web, editing some documents, some light video / photo editing, I never expected this thing to play games, but it does, something that can't be said for cheap Windows laptops.

It's also nice not having Copilot thrown at me every 5 seconds, having Windows update reboot my machine every time I want to use the damn thing, sleep mode actually working is a real treat, no need to keep an eye out for BIOS updates or driver updates.

The price of the laptop is too good, it makes everything else in its price range look like manufactured e-waste.
 
It's being hyped up because it blows every single Windows powered laptop out of the water at this price point. All of them, every single one.

Don't come back to me with "second hand laptops", we're not talking second hand here, we're talking about competing brand new laptops.

Anything made by a Microsoft OEM is made of plastic at this price point, all of them have much weaker processors, all of them have a quarter of the battery life, all of them have much lower quality screens, speakers, keyboards and touchpads.

Granted, these Windows laptops have removable SSD's and their RAM can usually be upgraded, that is a weak point of the MacBook, Whilst I won't defend the SSD being non-removable, no manufacturer has any excuse for that.

The RAM though, this little phone processor is so efficient, the whole laptop sips between 3-4 watts when I'm here browsing the web using firefox with 5-6 tabs open, if I do that on my work laptop (Lenovo Thinkpad E14 Gen6) it's sipping 17-20 watts, no wonder why the Neo gets four times the battery life. Packaging the RAM onto the die clearly has performance and power benefits, I wish I could upgrade the RAM, but I also went into this knowing I couldn't and not expecting the laptop to be anywhere near as capable as it actually is.

Again, this is my first MacBook, my first foray into MacOS, All I wanted a laptop for was browsing the web, editing some documents, some light video / photo editing, I never expected this thing to play games, but it does, something that can't be said for cheap Windows laptops.

It's also nice not having Copilot thrown at me every 5 seconds, having Windows update reboot my machine every time I want to use the damn thing, sleep mode actually working is a real treat, no need to keep an eye out for BIOS updates or driver updates.

The price of the laptop is too good, it makes everything else in its price range look like manufactured e-waste.
It's being hyped up because it appears cheap in a market obliterated by the AI RAMpocalypse, but $700 isn't cheap at all for a 8GB RAM/512GB SSD laptop.

I would recommend anything used over this new laptop, including a used Macbook M1 Air with 16GB RAM which can be had for less than a new Macbook Neo.
Plastic doesn't automatically mean eww plastic laptop bad, used Lenovo Thinkpads or HP Elitebooks with good screens are plentiful, with easily replaceable keyboards, batteries, screens,charge ports, etc.

Having only 8GB of RAM in a 2026 is too much of a limitation,IMO, anything more than a few browser tabs or some light office tasks is going to cause the system to swap to the SSD, not something I would want especially when the SSD isn't replaceable.

I don't like Windows either but no one is forcing you to use it with an x86 system, there are alternatives which are much nicer to use without all the Microslop garbage for basic tasks like browsing and photo editing.
 
I would recommend anything used over this new laptop, including a used Macbook M1 Air with 16GB RAM which can be had for less than a new Macbook Neo.
As expected, went straight to talking about the second hand market instead of brand new.
Plastic doesn't automatically mean eww plastic laptop bad, used Lenovo Thinkpads or HP Elitebooks with good screens are plentiful, with easily replaceable keyboards, batteries, screens,charge ports, etc.
My work laptops for the last 17 years have been exclusively HP ProBooks, EliteBooks and Lenovo Thinkpads (think my first laptop was IBM branded still). My only personal laptop back in 2016 was an Alienware R16, some massive beast as it was taking over my desktop at the time, my experience with laptops is fairly vast though, Asus, Acer, Dell, Dynabook, Microsoft Surface, even Sony, all of them I've had various models pulled apart, repaired pieces etc...

My current work laptop was £1400 (Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen6), it overheats, makes a lot of noise, lasts at most for 3 hours on battery. We're comparing a laptop that's over double the price of the Neo, and the Neo absolutely obliterates it for generic web browsing, document editing and light video / photo editing, it's not even close, and you can buy two Neo's for the same money, and the Neo has a nicer trackpad, screen and speakers, plus a much longer battery life.
Having only 8GB of RAM in a 2026 is too much of a limitation,IMO, anything more than a few browser tabs or some light office tasks is going to cause the system to swap to the SSD, not something I would want especially when the SSD isn't replaceable.
Where does the Lenovo win? Well I couldn't use the Neo for work, for work, I need RAM so I can virtualize switches and run VM's, I tend to have a fair amount of applications open, even the 32GB I have sometimes isn't enough, the CPU also having many cores comes in handy when stress testing certain tasks.

But I didn't buy the Neo for work, I bought it to use at home on the sofa, to browse the web, reply to emails, do some light video / photo editing, edit some documents and spreadsheets, it does this better than any Windows laptop I've had, I don't care about the spec's if it can do the task better than anything else in its price range.
I don't like Windows either but no one is forcing you to use it with an x86 system, there are alternatives which are much nicer to use without all the Microslop garbage for basic tasks like browsing and photo editing.
The company I work for mandates Windows, I cannot use anything other than Windows for work, when it comes to my personal laptop, are you suggesting if I buy a Windows laptop at the same price as the Neo, stick a flavour of Linux on it (I'm a bit of a fan of Fedora KDE) I'll magically get 12-16 hours of battery life out of it?

Edit: I have Firefox open with 6 tabs, iMessage, Mail, Calendar, Photos, Discord, Signal, WhatsApp, Microsoft Excel with a spreadhseet open, Steam and Battle.Net, RAM usage: 6.91GB, I couldn't care less about having more RAM, I don't even use all 8GB's that I have, in-fact, lets see while I have everything open, if I can edit some video in iMovie.

Edit2: I did a quick and dirty 1 minute trailer template in iMovie with various video files off my NAS, all of them off phones (Google Pixel 6 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro, Sony Xperia XZ Premium and OnePlus 7 Pro) the RAM actually went down, but swap started to get used, it basically moved 1GB out of RAM and into swap, iMovie and video scrubbing worked flawlessly though.
 
Last edited:
So here's a list of games I've tried and their status, I've used CrossOver for the translation layer which is an absolute doddle to get working, or used the native Mac version if available:

Star Wars Battlefront 2 (original) - Plays perfectly, 60fps, no issues, played this for a little while, forgot how good this game is.
Tropico 4 - Plays well, hitting 60fps, has similar stuttering issues as Deep Rock Galactic but these do seem to go away the longer you play.
Deep Rock Galactic - Plays well, hitting 30fps+, it does have a stuttering issue for a little while, it's shader cache stutter, but once this is done it runs fine.
Bioshock (original) - Opens, Audio totally broken, Extremely unstable, you can be at 0fps for 10 seconds, then suddenly at 30fps+, but it won't last long until you're in a massive freeze again, unplayable.
Mass Effect (original) - Plays poorly, 10-30fps, it looks fine, changing resolution doesn't affect performance, it seems the texture quality, the lower the better, but even then, it just wouldn't run nicely. No graphical glitches or anything, probably just needs more VRAM.
Call of Duty 2 - Doesn't work, game loads, the military channel videos play before the level loads, but you never make it in-game, it just freezes.
Spore - Doesn't work, fails to load at all.
Half-Life 2 - Plays perfectly, 60fps, has some tiny little stutters which seem to be shader cache related e.g. lightning effect for the first time causes a tiny stutter but then never stutters again.
World of Warcraft - Works natively, plays perfectly, 60fps, no issues
Heroes of the Storm - Works natively, plays perfectly, 60fps, no issues
Cyberpunk 2077 - Works natively, but performance is not ideal, 30-40fps, playable, sure, but not ideal, still impressive it's playable at all.
Unreal Tournament 2004 - Plays well, 60fps+, the only problem I have is a stutter every second, I think this is v-sync related, or lack there of, probably fixable from a quick Google.
Baldur's Gate 3 - Works natively, plays well, 30fps, I didn't use any upscaling so there's definitely room for improvement, very playable though.

The battery has now finally reached 10% left, so going to leave it there.

Edit: just want to say, CrossOver claims some of the games above do work, Spore for example, shows as "runs well", yet I couldn't get it to start at all. So that might be some of the limitation of running on the Neo at the moment.
Fantastic! Thanks for testing!

The incompatibilities are interesting. IDK if that is from the A18 not being an M series and needing patches from Crossover, or if something has changes since those games were tested by Crossover.

Really makes me wish Apple would just support Vulkan so we could port Proton over already. Now I really want those $300 used mac minis to show up again..... or just finally let us run mac OS on an ipad so I can have the portable PC of my dreams.....
It's being hyped up because it appears cheap in a market obliterated by the AI RAMpocalypse, but $700 isn't cheap at all for a 8GB RAM/512GB SSD laptop.
There is more to a laptop then RAM and storage. At the $600 starting price, and even at the $700 higher tier (really $500 and $600 the edu discount is trivial to get) you are dealing with the low end of Windows laptops that use thin plastics that break after a few years of use, cheap motherboards that dont stand up well to abuse, and slow processors. Worse if its one that had a dGPU, you end up with something crippled by poor power delivery and cooling. Dont forget the horrible battery life and post purchase support should you have an issue.
I would recommend anything used over this new laptop, including a used Macbook M1 Air with 16GB RAM which can be had for less than a new Macbook Neo.
Techbros that know how to shop for used business computers are not the target audience for the Neo. Sure, you and I know how to do it and frequently recommend them, but most people dont have someone like us on speed dial to find a PC for them, they are going to go buy a new PC from best buy or wal mart, and that is where the neo crushes the competition.
Plastic doesn't automatically mean eww plastic laptop bad, used Lenovo Thinkpads or HP Elitebooks with good screens are plentiful, with easily replaceable keyboards, batteries, screens,charge ports, etc.
Plastic weakens when stressed. Plastic frames will, inevitably, fail and require replacement. Lenovo in particular is really bad about this, using plastic mounts for the screw pots for their hinges. That distinctive creaking of plastic plagues even $2000 lenovos after a few years.

Also you're arguing....what, exactly? Because the teardown shows that the Neo.....has an easily replaceable battery, display assembly, keyboard, and charging ports.
Having only 8GB of RAM in a 2026 is too much of a limitation,IMO, anything more than a few browser tabs or some light office tasks is going to cause the system to swap to the SSD, not something I would want especially when the SSD isn't replaceable.

I don't like Windows either but no one is forcing you to use it with an x86 system, there are alternatives which are much nicer to use without all the Microslop garbage for basic tasks like browsing and photo editing.
A few tabs or some light office task is the exact market for the Neo. Most consumers are not power users. They visit Facebook, open Word, and pay their bills. Maybe they stream something on youtube. That's it.
 
Criticizing someone for their first post when they really do have a good point here, very welcoming LOL.

Everyone seems to be overhyping the heck out of this phone powered laptop which in reality isn't any more repairable than other laptops, Apple won't let you replace the SSD or RAM in it, or sell you new parts without having to jump through the "authorized repair" hoops of having to pair new parts to their devices which hampers the average person from actually fixing things.

I don't have to own any Apple devices to realize what the shortcomings are, once you look past the hype and PR for this laptop the drawbacks are very obvious.
It is not his first post, the first post on this topic...the Apple haters..., just like you.
You’re kind of arguing against something nobody claimed.

Nobody is saying the MacBook Neo is suddenly a repairability champion, it’s basically built the same way as most modern thin laptops. The same is true for a lot of Windows ultrabooks where RAM is soldered and storage isn’t meant to be user replaced.

The real point of the device is price and efficiency. You’re getting a very fast ARM chip, great battery life, and a full macOS laptop for around $500–$600. That’s what people are excited about.

Repairability is a separate discussion, but it’s not unique to Apple....most thin and light laptops across the industry are built the same way now. But I guess since it is Apple, the hate is deserving right?

All you haters should really read up on how macOS handles memory management before jumping in with the usual “8GB isn’t enough” line for the average user.
 
There's also the problem that he's thinking like an enthusiast would (all of us here are guilty of that) and not like a typical consumer. We here may spout off about how something's not easily repairable but you know what? The average user couldn't give a rat's rear end about that as long as the device works.
 
There's also the problem that he's thinking like an enthusiast would (all of us here are guilty of that) and not like a typical consumer. We here may spout off about how something's not easily repairable but you know what? The average user couldn't give a rat's rear end about that as long as the device works.
Even then Mac’s have been fairly repairable for a while now. The only drama I have with my MacBook Pro is the battery replacement requires effectively a chassis replacement but I get that replaced for free when it dips below 80% anyway. Everything else is easily replaceable
 
Back