Microsoft promises smarter Windows driven by NPU hardware

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,824   +202
Staff member
Why it matters: Microsoft is highlighting the benefits of neural processing units in Copilot+ PCs, their ability to enable new experiences in Windows, and what the next several years could look like. It's an ambitious vision and one that will require a lot of trust from the end-user, but it is perhaps not as far-fetched as you might think.

For Redmond, it all began with the Surface Hub 2 Smart Camera. Early on, Microsoft leveraged advanced artificial intelligence to perform complex tasks like altering perspective or reframing video. Critically, the jobs were performed locally using standalone hardware designed specifically for AI workloads. Using purpose-built hardware frees up other components like the CPU and GPU to focus on chores they are better equipped to handle.

Microsoft cited several examples demonstrating how NPUs can make tasks on the PC faster and more efficient. In Windows, it is now possible to use natural language to search for files and photos. Mu, the small language model introduced this past summer, serves as an AI agent to help with OS settings.

The controversial Recall feature, relaunched earlier this year after a privacy overhaul, is also powered by the NPU, as is Click to Do. The latter identifies on-screen text and images locally, and can take action on them on your behalf. A new feature in the Microsoft Photos app called relight, meanwhile, makes it trivially easy to add complex lighting elements to poorly lit images.

Microsoft said another benefit of the NPU is the ability to run multiple AI-enabled apps simultaneously. And when combined with cloud-based large language models, consumers should be able to get even more out of AI.

Should Microsoft's vision of AI agents come to fruition, it is not difficult to imagine a future where even more of our digital lives are put on autopilot. To get there, of course, AI agents will need to gain the trust of consumers. Once (if) that happens, however, there may be no going back.

Image credit: Dan DeLong

Permalink to story:

 
It's not about trusting AI, it's about the fact that I own my computer and I should have complete control over what I do and do not want it to do. I should be able to enable and disable AI as I please. You don't get to just tell people, "well, you're just gonna have to learn to trust it"
 
Idk where "trust" comes in. It's processing totally locally, that's the point of the NPU. It's a zero trust model its perfect form: data is not going anywhere at all. Don't like the feature it provides? Don't use it.
 
Idk where "trust" comes in. It's processing totally locally, that's the point of the NPU. It's a zero trust model its perfect form: data is not going anywhere at all. Don't like the feature it provides? Don't use it.
Even if the processing is all being done locally, there is no trust that MS will not be sending the results back to its servers anyways. Along with using those fat Copilot+ compliant NPUs to help catalog stuff on people's computers to phone home about, even if they aren't actively using any of the AI features. And those NPU themselves are just such waste of die space; most of those AI task themselves would run just fine on the iGPU, at the cost of a bit more power usage, but unless you are using it for background blur for hours long Team video calls who cares. More cache for the iGPU would be far more useful for the typical user than the bigger NPU.
 
Idk where "trust" comes in. It's processing totally locally, that's the point of the NPU. It's a zero trust model its perfect form: data is not going anywhere at all. Don't like the feature it provides? Don't use it.
No problem. I won’t. Microsoft hasn't delivered meaningful improvements to Windows in over a decade, at least not from my experience. What they have done is systematically erode user trust—to the point where I no longer want their products in my home or small business. I grew up with Windows. Now, it’s a pariah here. “Zero trust” sounds great in theory, but when it comes from a company that’s burned that bridge time and again, I’m not interested. There’s zero reason to give them the benefit of the doubt—and I won’t.
 
I can certainly say copilot in Office is utterly useless and since I don't trust M$ much at all, I trust M$ based AI even less.

They have nothing at all to offer on Windows despite it's bloat, aging file system, slow kernel, terrible UI, generally overall slow performance for computing compared to Linux, so let's window dress and hide all that behind the AI snake oil salesman show.
 
Considering Palantir the only purpose these NPU's could serve is spying, as M$py won't run LLM's locally.
 
The only thing I have to do is die one day.
The rest is my choice.
Like abandoning Microsoft.
 
Don't even get what the convenience proposition is for this as its just adding more slop to people's devices, but that is Windows these days, AI crap being peddled continually as if recall and the like will magically change the way you use your device is nonsense
 
I lost trust in M$ back when Windows XP came out. Lost trust in their ability to develop anything worth while, secure, useful, robust, you get the idea.

After the release of Windows XP, I set out on a life long journey with Linux. Been using it 100% ever since and I even get paid to architect Linux solutions. I still have a while to go before retirement, but I bet Microsoft retired before I do - after seeing all the backlash over Recall and completely disabling local user accounts all over social media the last couple of days and all the people moving over to Linux and Mac, I dont see M$ surviving this on the desktop. Perhaps Azure will keep them alive, but, again, that's mostly Linux also.

Maybe they will have a home in large businesses with lazy people that dont want to ever change.. Perhaps, but only in America... Looks like other countries are migrating away from the Microsoft ecosystem as well.

Maybe, down the road, they will use Linux as their kernel and open source their operating system and stand a chance of survival.

Who knows..? But as for me and my family (And work colleagues, friends, and others I know), we will continue to use Linux and NOT Microsoft.
 
I'm a gamer first and foremost, so any AI features are often wasted on me anyway. Add to that the fact that I'm pretty set in my ways and really don't see a need for a new "gee whizz" feature set when I consider how I use my systems, so I'll give it a pass. IMHO all these new AI abilities are simply the result of people being entranced by a possible future presented in SciFi media. But are they really needed by your average user? Maybe they're another example of solutions looking for a problem...
 
I trust AI less than I trust MS and that means less than at all. I don't want a machine to "force think" my next move. AI is just getting in the way
 
Back