Microsoft to lay off thousands in July, but don't worry, AI's getting $80 billion

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,491   +1,612
Staff member
In context: There's been plenty of talk about machines displacing human workers in the AI Age, mainly focusing on direct replacements – computers taking over tasks like design and programming. Meanwhile, spending on AI infrastructure soars as investment in human skills steadily declines.

Bloomberg reports that Microsoft is preparing to lay off thousands of workers next month, with most of the cuts expected to hit the company's sales and customer service divisions. It's a jarring move but not an unfamiliar one in tech. What stands out this time is what Microsoft is doing with the money it's saving: pumping an estimated $80 billion into AI infrastructure over the next fiscal year.

That number isn't a typo. As Microsoft reshapes its workforce, it's reshaping its balance sheet, too. It's laying off human employees while building new homes for silicon-based replacements – in hyperscale data centers, GPUs, and power-hungry server farms.

Microsoft has not explicitly linked the layoffs to AI, but the connection is increasingly difficult to ignore. The company is investing heavily in machine learning capabilities across its entire product line, from Azure to Office. Its partnership with OpenAI and the widespread deployment of Copilot reflect a strategic pivot away from labor-intensive workflows and toward automated solutions.

Despite the scale of this shift, Microsoft has offered little public indication that large-scale retraining or internal upskilling efforts are part of its AI strategy. The company clearly has the resources to help employees adapt to an AI-centric future, yet such initiatives are largely absent from its announcements and disclosures. The emphasis so far has been on infrastructure, partnerships, and AI product rollouts – not on preparing its broader workforce for the changes those investments will bring.

This approach reflects a broader trend across the tech sector. Companies including Amazon, Duolingo, and Dropbox have all cited AI-driven efficiency gains when announcing workforce reductions. These moves often emphasize shareholder value and operational agility, even as they diminish opportunities for employees to transition into new roles within the organization.

Microsoft plans to lay off thousands globally in the coming weeks. While the company has not disclosed exact figures, reports suggest a significant impact on customer-facing teams. These cuts underscore the shift away from labor-intensive roles as Microsoft pivots toward automation and AI-driven services.

The contrast is stark: AI receives billions in dedicated capital, while workers get severance packages and uncertain futures. Microsoft isn't just betting on artificial intelligence – it's actively reorganizing its operations around it. This strategy may pay off in the long term, but it highlights a widening gap between investment in automation and support for displaced employees.

Permalink to story:

 
If M$ didn't own such a large share of the internet and make so much from data collection they probably would have gone under at this point. Considering the dumpster fire that Windows 11 is turning out to be, I think M$ doesn't want to sell operating systems anymore. I think they want to be a cloud services and AI company. I also think consumers have their limits, especially in this economy. Maybe the new generation will be more willing to adopt this whole "you will own nothing and be happy" economy.

I suspect the AI will do a far better job than the humans were...
that's optimistic. I bet the thought process was more along the lines of "the quality of our work is about that of an AI, why are we still paying people?"
 
Don't worry they're partners with Cognizant, so those "thousands" will be replaced by 10.000(!!!) Indians at far lower wages and the work will be lower quality.

But don't worry you will not notice a single thing.
 
Don't worry they're partners with Cognizant, so those "thousands" will be replaced by 10.000(!!!) Indians at far lower wages and the work will be lower quality.

But don't worry you will not notice a single thing.
I don't know how their quality of work could get any lower
 
If there's an additional 80 billion dollars being spent on "AI", it sounds like there's a lot of new jobs being created somewhere. And that's all before these new AI capabilities have truly been taken up by the larger economy to build new or newly cost effective products & services across all areas of life. For a semi-recent example, think of how many companies, jobs, job titles, etc. are new since the Internet became widely accessible. I think the AI opportunities may be similar or even more explosive.
 
I don't know how their quality of work could get any lower
Imagine calling a servicedesk because you're having issues with your account, you the user has no idea what is the cause of it.

This servicedesk then asks you: "Where should I forward the ticket to?"

You obviously have no idea and it's obviously their job to know that.

Another example is them calling someone in the middle of the night on a Sunday for a ticket and closing the ticket because the user did not respond. They don't know about timezones apparently.

Other times they keep the tickets open for weeks without updates and then close it without a solution and refer you to some party that does zero with said issues.

That's about the level of quality you can expect.
 
If M$ didn't own such a large share of the internet and make so much from data collection they probably would have gone under at this point. Considering the dumpster fire that Windows 11 is turning out to be, I think M$ doesn't want to sell operating systems anymore. I think they want to be a cloud services and AI company. I also think consumers have their limits, especially in this economy. Maybe the new generation will be more willing to adopt this whole "you will own nothing and be happy" economy.


that's optimistic. I bet the thought process was more along the lines of "the quality of our work is about that of an AI, why are we still paying people?"
Microsoft is quite diversified.
Windows is what they're known for because it was the first success and remains relevant to this day.
But office, teams (as bad as it is), Xbox, SharePoint, surface devices, azure cloud etc etc. They got their fingers in many pies.
Don't think they're going anywhere out of the big three 3 trillion dollar tech companies (Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft) they're probably the safest bet for slow steady growth with little risk.
Well unless Europe really cuts loose from the US and states running non US alternatives for everything. Let's hope Donald doesn't want Greenland that bad.
 
Imagine calling a servicedesk because you're having issues with your account, you the user has no idea what is the cause of it.

This servicedesk then asks you: "Where should I forward the ticket to?"

You obviously have no idea and it's obviously their job to know that.

Another example is them calling someone in the middle of the night on a Sunday for a ticket and closing the ticket because the user did not respond. They don't know about timezones apparently.

Other times they keep the tickets open for weeks without updates and then close it without a solution and refer you to some party that does zero with said issues.

That's about the level of quality you can expect.
My internet provider help line was never stable, nor helpful, but at least You could report downtime, clicking through something like 10 to 20 steps. Recently They deployed AI, and It just crushes 20 seconds into conversation. Great success.
 
I wonder how fu*ked the global economy will be before we realise this whole AI thing might not have been such a good idea after all?
 
I wonder how fu*ked the global economy will be before we realise this whole AI thing might not have been such a good idea after all?
Im interested to see how far AI gets before the economy crashes. This is the housing market 2.0, all these corporations aren't paying cash for these AI data centers, they're financing them and purchasing them with debt.

AI has started doing some really interesting things over the last 6 months where it isn't just a chatbot anymore. I dont think AI is as valuable as all these companies make it out to be, but I do think it has a place. For awhile, it was just people trying to buy up all the AI chips so that other companies couldn't have them, but all they did was make nVidia excessively rich. The thing with that is, we're nolonger limited by compute in developing AI so we're going to see the sale of AI chips slow over the next 1-2 years. Many companies have already spent hundreds of billions on AI hardware as it is, there really isn't anyone left to spend hundreds of billions on AI hardware. Further, everyone who did spend tons of money on AI hardware has been losing money

We're gonna reach a point where we see companies say "we have lost a billion dollars a month since we spent $100 billion dollars on AI hardware, are we going to suddenly be profitable if we spend ANOTHER $100 billion on AI hardware?"
 
Last edited:
Im interested to see how far AI gets before the economy crashes. This is the housing market 2.0, all these corporations aren't paying cash for these AI data centers, they're financing them and purchasing them with debt.

AI has started doing some really interesting things over the last 6 months where it isn't just a chatbot anymore. I dont think AI is as valuable as all these companies make it out to be, but I do think it has a place. For awhile, it was just people trying to buy up all the AI chips so that other companies couldn't have them, but all they did was make nVidia excessively rich. The thing with that is, we're nolonger limited by compute in developing AI so we're going to see the sale of AI chips slow over the next 1-2 years. Many companies have already spent hundreds of billions on AI hardware as it is, there really isn't anyone left to spend hundreds of billions on AI hardware. Further, everyone who did spend tons of money on AI hardware has been losing money

We're gonna reach a point where we see companies say "we have lost a billion dollars a month since we spent $100 billion dollars on AI hardware, are we going to suddenly be profitable if we spend ANOTHER $100 billion on AI hardware?"
If AI succeeds the global economy is fu*ked because the unemployment it will cause and lack of incomes/tax and need for social programs will kill nations.
If AI fails the global economy is fu*ked because the money that has been gambled and in most cases frittered on AI all goes up in smoke when the imbecilic upper strata of companies and governments that hold the purse-strings all finally realise there is no I in current AI at all.
 
If AI succeeds the global economy is fu*ked because the unemployment it will cause and lack of incomes/tax and need for social programs will kill nations.
No... people will adapt - like they ALWAYS do when a new technology "steals" jobs. Yes, some people will suffer in the interim, but it won't destroy anything...
If AI fails the global economy is fu*ked because the money that has been gambled and in most cases frittered on AI all goes up in smoke when the imbecilic upper strata of companies and governments that hold the purse-strings all finally realise there is no I in current AI at all.
I'll agree there - but it won't fail...
 
No... people will adapt - like they ALWAYS do when a new technology "steals" jobs. Yes, some people will suffer in the interim, but it won't destroy anything...
I'm not so sure this time. If AI really does end being able to do most jobs a human being can do then that is very different to the adaptions in the past such as the industrial revolution.
 
I'm not so sure this time. If AI really does end being able to do most jobs a human being can do then that is very different to the adaptions in the past such as the industrial revolution.
That’s what people have said every time - but then we adapt anyways… AIs won’t be able to do EVERYTHING - at least, not right away…
 
Back